Pertiwi, Lucia Citra
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Efektivitas Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) Meningkatkan Regulasi Emosi: Studi Meta-Analisis Pertiwi, Lucia Citra; Yudiarso, Ananta
Intuisi : Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah Vol 15, No 2 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Jurusan Psikologi, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/intuisi.v15i2.36111

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian meta-analisis ini untuk menjelaskan efektivitas intervensi Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) untuk meningkatkan regulasi emosi pada penderita gangguan psikologis. Metode penelitian ini merupakan studi meta-analisis dengan kajian literatur pada 11 jurnal internasional. Penelitian ini melibatkan 507 partisipan dari seluruh penelitian yang telah dilakukan. Intervensi yang diberikan pada partisipan merupakan DBT, namun ada pula yang hanya menggunakan DBT-skill training program. Peneliti menggunakan The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials untuk menilai resiko bias penelitian. Berdasarkan hasil pengolahan data mean, standard deviation, dan jumlah sampel dari kelompok kontrol maupun kelompok intervensi melalui software Jamovi 2 dan didapatkan nilai effect size hedge’s g yaitu -,983 (95% CI –2,161 – ,259) dansebesar 97.15%. Selain itu, ditunjukkan pula egger’s bias P sebesar ,009 (P ,05) sehingga terdapat bias publikasi. Hasil analisis data, nilai effect size hedge’s g menunjukkan bahwa DBT memiliki large effect size, maka DBT efektif dalam meningkatkan regulasi emosi pada individu dengan gangguan psikologis. Keterbatasan penelitian ini adalah kurangnya penelitian yang menunjukkan negative findings, sehingga perlu dilakukan penelitian meta-analisis lain yang melibatkan penelitian dengan negative finding.The purpose of this study was to identify the efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) to improve emotion regulation for individuals with psychological disorders. The study method was a meta-analysis study with 11 international research articles. This research involved 507 participants from all of the previous studies. DBT intervention was given to the participants yet there were some studies used DBT-skill training programs. Researchers used The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials to evaluate risk of bias. Data analysis of mean, standard deviation, and a total sample of control groups and intervention groups, using Jamovi 2 software and shows effect size hedge’s g values -,983 (95% CI –2,161 – ,259) and heterogeneity value I2 =  97,15%. Also, it showed egger’s bias P-value ,009 (P ,05), which explained a study bias. Results of the study emphasize that this study had a large effect size in which DBT is effective in improving emotion regulation for individuals with psychological disorders. This meta-analysis study had the lack of negative findings research and thus further meta-analysis research is necessary because it is also found an inconsistent finding.
VALIDATION OF THE INDONESIAN VERSION OF THE PARTNER’S EMOTIONAL DEPENDENCY SCALE (SED): A RASCH MODEL APPROACH Pertiwi, Lucia Citra; Yudiarso, Ananta
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 22, No 2 (2023): October 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jp.22.2.102-117

Abstract

This research aimed to verify the Indonesian version of the Partner’s Emotional Dependency Scale (SED), originally developed by Camarillo et al. (2020) in Spanish. The SED is a unidimensional scale with 22 items designed to measure emotional dependence on a partner. This is the first time the instrument has been adapted, particularly for use in Indonesia. The validation process employed the Rasch model to ensure the scale’s reliability and accuracy in the Indonesian context. The study involved 229 participants (F = 185, M = 44), aged between 18 and 35 (MAge = 25.5, SD = 4.23). The results confirmed the unidimensionality of the SED scale, with 2 – 3 items contributing to the second dimension. The 5-point Likert scale functioned effectively, enabling respondents to distinguish between different response options. The person-item interaction reliability was found to be .85, and the item reliability was .98, indicating excellent reliability of the SED scale items. All items were evenly distributed across the scale from high to low difficulty. However, items number 1, 3, and 7 (SED 1, SED 3, SED 7) were identified as less suitable for measuring emotional dependence and respondents found it difficult to answer these specific questions. Furthermore, three items (SED 5, SED 6, and SED 19) exhibited Differential Item Functioning (DIF) due to gender bias. The study concludes that, with some revisions and improving the translation, the Indonesian version of the SED scale could be a valuable tool for measuring the level of emotional dependence on a partner in the Indonesian population.