Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Klitih and Street Crimes: Why Juvenile Involved in Crime? Putri, Siti Ameenah; Faradina, Ginar Listya; Sabri, Ahmad Zaharuddin Sani Ahmad; Putri, Laras Widayati
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Justice, Crime, and Law Enforcement in Various Contexts
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v9i2.65819

Abstract

The spectrum of crimes within society is becoming increasingly diverse. Notably prevalent among them are street crimes perpetrated by teenagers, commonly known as "Klitih." These offenses encompass acts of abuse, physical assault, and theft accompanied by violence. Klitih crimes are often associated with high school students, and the perpetrators are typically motivated by subjective factors such as personal animosity, a quest for revenge, discontent within specific groups, or simply a desire to fill their leisure time. The characteristic feature of Klitih crimes is their association with adolescents, and these actions are frequently carried out by teenagers who are still in the throes of their high school years. The motivations behind such actions are often rooted in personal emotions and grievances. Klitih crimes occurring among students of similar age groups often involve a complex interplay of roles, wherein the victim's conduct plays a significant part. This interrelation is particularly evident in a juvenile street crime incident on Jalan Gedong Kuning, Bangutapan sub-district, Yogyakarta. Victim Precipitation, or the role of the victim, can be simplistically understood as the contribution of the victim's actions that accelerates or triggers the commission of a crime. In the Gedongkuning street incident involving Klitih actions, the victim's pursuit played a crucial role, acting as a catalyst that propelled the perpetrator to expedite their Klitih actions.
Authority of the Information Commission as a Quasi Judicial Institution in Resolving Public Information Disputes Faradina, Ginar Listya
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2023): July-December, 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v2i2.68229

Abstract

The right to information is a guaranteed right in laws and regulations for every citizen. The promulgation of the Public Information Disclosure Act is a new era to ensure the fulfillment of the right to information. Within the framework of carrying out public information disclosure, of course we are faced with various public information disputes, namely disputes that arise between users of public information and public bodies. Along with the increasing demands and needs of the public in the constitutional legal system, various judicial institutions have been specifically formed and specifically mandated by the state legislation through to examine and decide disputes other than those that are the domain of the existing judiciary or are referred to as quasi-judicial or quasi-judicial institutions, one of which is the Information Commission. This writing examines the authority of the Information Commission as a quasi-judicial institution in resolving public information disputes through a non-litigation process. Which emphasized that one of the mandates of the UU KIP is the establishment of an Information Commission which has the authority to resolve public information disputes in a non-litigation manner, namely in the form of mediation and non-litigation adjudication. The information commission has special powers that are absolute, absolute, and cannot be transferred or given to other institutional bodies. The two main tasks of the position of the information commission are finalizing and establishing general policies related to public information services for public bodies.