Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Diniati Wafida Rohmah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Perkara PT. Sarana Farmindo Utama (Putusan Perkara Nomor: 28/KPPU-M/2019) Eqlima Dianti Agustianingrum; Diniati Wafida Rohmah
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i1.2089

Abstract

Basically, merger, merger, and expropriation are actions that are unknown and also not developed in Indonesia. Mergers, mergers, and takeovers are also very vulnerable to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, therefore the Law on antimonopoly strongly violates marger, acquisition, and consolidation which is likely to result in monopolistic practices or unfair business competition, which has been regulated in Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The Competition Supervisory Commission also has the obligation to conduct investigations and examinations on unfair business actors, and the existence of unfair business competition can result in an imbalance of economic power because it is controlled by one pillar only and this can lead to unfair business competition. The purpose of this study is to be able to understand the takeover procedure carried out by PT. Sarana Farmindo Utama to PT. The prospect of Karyatama in Decision Number Case 28 / KPPU-M / 2019 and also to be able to understand the settlement of cases carried out by PT. Sarana Farmindo Utama in the case of the takeover of shares of PT. Karyatama Prospects. Based on the results of the share takeover research conducted by PT. Sarana Farmindo Utama is to save PT. The prospect of Karyatama almost going bankrupt and also to continue to run as a feeder for livestock chickens, a violation that was carried out by PT. Sarana Farmindo Utama is late notification of takeover to the Commission. And PT. Sarana Farmindo has been legally penalized by paying fines, and is also required to submit proof of fine payments to the Business Competition Supervisory Commission.
Permohonan Izin Poligami pada Pengadilan Agama Surabaya: (Studi Putusan Nomor 1751/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sby) Diniati Wafida Rohmah; Murni Murni
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v1i4.247

Abstract

The aim of this inquiry is to excavate a profound comprehension concerning the quest for a polygamy license, by delving into the judicial decree regarding the rationale of the Surabaya Religious Tribunal in bestowing such a license, scrutinizing and dissecting the juridical and communal dimensions of ruling number 1751/Pdt.G/2024/PA. Sby. Here, the Seeker sought approval for polygamy against the Opponent due to the Opponent’s incapacity to satisfy the Seeker’s carnal desires, attributed to the presence of diabetes. The quandaries investigated pertain to the statutes and stipulations governing polygamy petitions and the Jurist’s rationale in adjudicating the polygamy license request. This investigation employs a normative jurisprudence technique, drawing upon an examination of texts, and adopts a legislative framework in its approach. The findings of this examination indicate that the Panel of Jurists factors in both legal and compassionate facets in its deliberations.
Co-Authors Eqlima Dianti Agustianingrum Murni Murni