Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Decisio: Law Journal

Konsekuensi Hukum bagi Pejabat Negara yang Terbukti Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Listiana, Cici Ayu; Karli, Karli
Decisio: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 1 No 2 (2024): DECISIO
Publisher : LPPM Iblam School of Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/decisio.v1i2.19

Abstract

Tindak pidana pencucian uang (TPPU) is a severe crime that threatens the stability of Indonesia’s economic and legal system. The involvement of state officials in TPPU not only undermines public trust but also weakens the integrity of governmental institutions. This study analyzes the legal consequences for state officials proven to be involved in money laundering within Indonesia’s criminal law framework. The research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of sanctions and legal enforcement mechanisms applicable to corrupt officials. This study employs a qualitative approach with a normative legal method, focusing on regulatory analysis and the interpretation of legal norms in practice. Data collection relies on literature studies involving primary legal sources such as laws, regulations, and court decisions, complemented by secondary sources like legal books and academic journals. The findings indicate that state officials convicted of TPPU face severe criminal penalties, including imprisonment, fines, dismissal from office, and future restrictions from holding public positions. However, legal enforcement faces significant challenges, including political intervention, sophisticated money laundering methods, and resource limitations. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, improving inter-agency coordination, and enhancing public transparency are crucial steps in addressing this issue. This study underscores the need for multi-sectoral efforts to ensure effective law enforcement and restore public confidence in governance
Efektivitas Restorative Justice sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Anak dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Rahmadani, Mahfud; Karli, Karli
Decisio: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2025): DECISIO
Publisher : LPPM Iblam School of Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/decisio.v2i1.20

Abstract

Restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach in resolving juvenile criminal cases, emphasizing reconciliation rather than punitive measures. In Indonesia, the implementation of restorative justice is legally supported through Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which mandates diversion as a primary mechanism. However, despite its progressive framework, various challenges hinder the effective application of restorative justice in practice. These obstacles include inconsistencies in law enforcement, limited institutional support, and societal resistance to non-punitive legal resolutions. This study employs a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, focusing on regulatory analysis and the interpretation of legal norms in current practices. Data were collected through comprehensive literature reviews, classifying legal materials into primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The findings indicate that restorative justice, particularly through diversion, provides a more humane resolution for juvenile offenders, reducing stigmatization and enhancing rehabilitation efforts. However, disparities in law enforcement practices, lack of adequate facilities, and varying levels of community acceptance have impeded its full implementation. Strengthening legal frameworks, increasing capacity-building programs for law enforcement, and enhancing public awareness are essential for the optimal application of restorative justice in Indonesia. Effective collaboration between legal institutions and community-based organizations is crucial in ensuring a fair and rehabilitative justice system for juvenile offenders.