Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Assyura Zumarnis
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Hukum terkait Restrukturisasi BUMN melalui Konsolidasi Pembentukan Bank Syariah Indonesia: Aspek Regulasi dan Pengawasan Sela Sulaksmi Widyatamaka; Assyura Zumarnis; Nyulistiowati Suryanti; Deviana Yuanitasari
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.839

Abstract

This research was made to find out how the application of law in the banking consolidation system which is the embodiment of a company owned by a State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). Consolidation is the process of merging two or more companies to form one new company where the old company that has merged will disappear as a legal effect, such as Bank Mandiri Syariah, Bank BRI Syariah, and Bank BNI Syariah forming Bank Syariah Indonesia. With the consolidation mechanism, new legal consequences arise that will become the basis for running the consolidated banking operational system. The method used in this research is normative juridical with analytical descriptive aspects as the basis for assessing legal concepts in the research. Based on the results of the research, the consolidation of Islamic banking uses the same mechanism system as a limited liability company as stipulated in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. However, Islamic banking has different aspects of supervision from conventional banking in general. In addition, Bank Syariah Indonesia Tbk as an Islamic bank has also achieved the goals of a SOEs as mandated by law.
Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 04/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023 PN Niaga Mdn jo. Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Mdn Terkait Penerapan Asas Erga Omnes dan Asas Promulgatie Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Ke Assyura Zumarnis
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i3.1190

Abstract

Receivable disputes may be resolved through bankruptcy mechanisms that culminate in a bankruptcy ruling. However, legal issues may still arise post-verdict, such as in Commercial Court Decision Number 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Mdn, where the receivable claim filed by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry was rejected due to late submission. In resolving the case, the judge considered two legal principles: erga omnes and promulgatie. This paper aims to examine the position of these principles in bankruptcy cases and analyze the judge’s legal reasoning regarding the late submission of receivables under Indonesian bankruptcy law. This study uses a normative juridical approach, with the research specification being analytical-descriptive in nature. The data are secondary in form and are collected through literature review. The method of data analysis employed is qualitative normative analysis. The findings of this study show that the erga omnes and promulgatie principles hold a significant position within Indonesian bankruptcy law. These principles are implicitly reflected in Article 15 paragraph (4) and Article 24 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Law (UUKPKPU). These principles apply insofar as there are no specific provisions limiting their application. In this case, the judge's legal reasoning in deciding the renvoi procedure is deemed inaccurate because there is a specific provision that governs the late submission of receivable claims. Therefore, the application of the erga omnes and promulgatie principles should have been subject to such limitation.
Co-Authors Deviana Yuanitasari Nyulistiowati Suryanti Sela Sulaksmi Widyatamaka