Sutikno, Yusak
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Peningkatan Pemberdayaan Pembelajaran Penyandang Disabilitas Netra melalui PeTra (Pena BerceriTra): Inovasi Teknologi untuk Aksesibilitas dan Kemandirian Literasi Tanra, Ivan; Hasudungan, Aswin Oktavian; Alfianto, Ade Septian; Purnama, Louis Putra; Sutikno, Yusak
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Teknik Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyrakat Teknik (JPMT)
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24853/jpmt.6.2.76-81

Abstract

Salah satu hambatan utama yang dihadapi oleh penyandang tunanetra dalam mengakses buku konvensional adalah keterbatasan dalam membaca tulisan secara langsung. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan solusi yang dapat mengatasi kendala tersebut. Artikel ini mengusulkan sebuah alat inovatif yang memanfaatkan kombinasi mini komputer, kamera, dan penyuara telinga untuk mengubah tulisan menjadi suara, memfasilitasi pemahaman isi buku. Alat ini telah diuji pada para penyandang tunanetra dengan tingkat kepuasan hasil lebih dari 80%, menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan alat ini efektif sebagai bantuan dalam memahami buku konvensional bagi penyandang tunanetra.
Seleksi Jabatan Fungsional Umum Inspektur Bandar Udara Dengan Pendekatan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Sutikno, Yusak; Saputra, Hendri
Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/jrsi.v13i1.6596.47-58

Abstract

Airport Inspector is a strategic position responsible for carrying out technical guidance activities in regulation, control, supervision, investigation and operational safety services in the airport sector. Therefore, assessing and selecting personnel with appropriate abilities, competencies, and performance is essential to ensure that the right candidate fills this position so that services can be provided optimally. The current selection process is considered to be only administrative, does not reflect the expected competencies and performance, and is less transparent, so the results cannot be accounted for. This research solves this problem by optimizing the selection process using one of the Multi Criteria Decisions Method (MCDM) approaches, the AHP method, where this approach has never been used before. Through AHP, the selection process can be carried out in a more structured, objective, transparent, and intuitive manner as expected. This research optimizes the existing assessment criteria so that all parties can still accept the results: Formal Education, Competency, Years of Service, and Work Performance. The result shows that Work Performance has the highest weighting value (0.513), followed by Competency (0.267), Work Period (0.119), and Formal Education (0.101). The synthesis value of all criteria/sub-criteria shows that Candidate 3 is the highest (scale 1 of 1), then Candidate (0.742 of 1), Candidate 4 (0.726 of 1), and Candidate 1 is the lowest (0.665 of 1).
Seleksi Jabatan Fungsional Umum Inspektur Bandar Udara Dengan Pendekatan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Sutikno, Yusak; Saputra, Hendri
Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/jrsi.v13i1.6596.47-58

Abstract

Airport Inspector is a strategic position responsible for carrying out technical guidance activities in regulation, control, supervision, investigation and operational safety services in the airport sector. Therefore, assessing and selecting personnel with appropriate abilities, competencies, and performance is essential to ensure that the right candidate fills this position so that services can be provided optimally. The current selection process is considered to be only administrative, does not reflect the expected competencies and performance, and is less transparent, so the results cannot be accounted for. This research solves this problem by optimizing the selection process using one of the Multi Criteria Decisions Method (MCDM) approaches, the AHP method, where this approach has never been used before. Through AHP, the selection process can be carried out in a more structured, objective, transparent, and intuitive manner as expected. This research optimizes the existing assessment criteria so that all parties can still accept the results: Formal Education, Competency, Years of Service, and Work Performance. The result shows that Work Performance has the highest weighting value (0.513), followed by Competency (0.267), Work Period (0.119), and Formal Education (0.101). The synthesis value of all criteria/sub-criteria shows that Candidate 3 is the highest (scale 1 of 1), then Candidate (0.742 of 1), Candidate 4 (0.726 of 1), and Candidate 1 is the lowest (0.665 of 1).