Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Widya Yuridika Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities Human Rights in The Global South (HRGS)
Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengujian Formil Peraturan Antara Indonesia dan Kolombia Firmansyah, Adithya Tri; Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri; Pritasari, Amalia Zulfa; Zulmi, Muhammad Nizar; Alivia, Imera Azzahra
Widya Yuridika Vol 7, No 2 (2024): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v7i2.5010

Abstract

The authority to review laws by the Constitutional Court is manifested in 2 (two) forms, namely material testing and formal testing. However, since the existence of the Constitutional Court, only 1 (one) application has been granted by the Constitutional Court, namely a request for a formal review of the Job Creation Law. Even then, it was only partially granted. The existence of this fact certainly shows that the role of the Constitutional Court has not been optimal. Therefore, this research aims to outline the prescription of the need to optimize the role of the Constitutional Court in the formal review of laws. This research uses normative (legal) research typology. The results of this study conclude: First, the role of the Constitutional Court in the formal review of laws can still be said to be not optimal because the Constitutional Court itself is still very limited in canceling laws, as evidenced in Decision Number 91 / PUU-XVIII / 2020, the Constitutional Court tends to compromise with the language of conditional unconstitutional decisions in deciding applications for formal testing of the Job Creation Law. Second, the countries of Colombia and Indonesia show that the practice of formal testing of the Law by the Constitutional Court is something that needs to be done if there is a violation of the formation procedure by the legislator, it is just that the Colombian Constitutional Court in conducting formal testing takes a more progressive step, this is indicated by the quality and quantity of handling of formal test cases decided, on the other hand in Indonesia, the Constitutional Court seems to take a position that tends to be very limited in conducting formal testing, it even looks unfamiliar to do so, besides that the 1945 Constitution also does not provide rigid arrangements regarding the basis for formal testing of laws by the Constitutional Court.
Penyelesaian Peraturan Daerah Bermasalah Berdasarkan Asas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri; Nugroho, Ahmad; Syahrani, Nabila; Susmayanti, Riana
INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON LAW, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES Vol 5 No 1 (2024): May 2024
Publisher : Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/idj.v5i1.43679

Abstract

Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia stipulates that regional governments can carry out their government affairs based on the principles of autonomy and assistance duties. Regional regulations must be formed appropriately to reflect the needs of society and what needs to be regulated and resolved. So regional regulations must be in line with the guidelines on the principles of statutory regulations. However, as KPPOD data states, up to 2021 there are at least 347 regional regulations that are still problematic. For example, Surakarta City Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2011 concerning Regional Taxes, Mukomuko Regency Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2016 concerning Muslim and Muslim Dress for Students, and Bogor City Regional Regulation Number 10 of 2018 concerning Non-Smoking Areas. The research uses normative juridical research methods with a statutory and regulatory approach, with primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials in this research was carried out using documentation studies. The research results show that the regional regulations that the author used as a case study in this research have problems in their implementation. These problems include conflicts of norms and regional regulations that differ in substance from the latest decisions testing the regulations used as guidelines by these regional regulations, which ultimately results in the emergence of legal uncertainty in society. Therefore, the competent authorities can immediately revise or revoke these regulations. Keywords: Principles of Statutory Regulations, Regional Government, Regional Regulations.
Human Rights and Democracy: Can the President's Constitutional Disobedience Be Used as Grounds for Impeachment? Aritonang, Syofina Dwi Putri; Muchamad Ali Safa'at; Riana Susmayanti
Human Rights in the Global South (HRGS) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Serikat Pengajar Hak Asasi Manusia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56784/hrgs.v3i1.80

Abstract

The protection of human rights is essential in a democratic society. This paper examines the historical context of regulating presidential impeachment in relation to human rights violations by exploring the legal framework governing such actions, particularly focusing on the President's response to the Constitutional Court's decision. For instance, the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 declared the Job Creation Act conditionally unconstitutional and prohibited the issuance of any implementing regulations based on it. Nevertheless, the President went ahead and issued Presidential Regulation Number 113 of 2021, which constitutes a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the 1945 Constitution. This study used normative legal research, with statutory and comparative approaches, and interpreted legal materials through constitutional and historical lenses. The findings indicate that Indonesia, having similar experiences of the United States, South Korea, and the Philippines, lacks comprehensive regulations for impeaching the President based on human rights violations. Additionally, there is a gap in the regulations concerning the President's defiance of the Constitutional Court's decisions. Therefore, this paper proposes that the definition of violations related to impeachment be limited to the President's oaths as stated in Article 9(1) of the 1945 Constitution. If the President fails to comply with the Constitutional Court's decision, they should be held accountable through the impeachment process. Finally, it is necessary to amend Article 10(3)(d) of the Constitutional Court Act to include specific qualifications for presidential misconduct.
Co-Authors Alivia, Imera Azzahra Firmansyah, Adithya Tri Muchamad Ali Safaat Nugroho, Ahmad Pritasari, Amalia Zulfa Riana Susmayanti Syahrani, Nabila Zulmi, Muhammad Nizar