Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam El-Iqtishady
Ansari , Teuku Syahrul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pactum De Compromittendo In Shares Purchase Agreement Iswari, Benny; Ansari , Teuku Syahrul; Victor, Indra Yudha Victor; Hadipura, Margo Hadipura
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 15 No 2 (2023): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i2.6462

Abstract

The parties, namely the Seller and the Buyer have agreed to determine the arbitration clause in the form of a pactum de compromittendo made in writing and incorporated into the deed of the principal agreement for the sale and purchase of shares of PT. Indonesian Rice Granary. This means that since the beginning before the occurrence of a dispute, the choice of settlement has been determined through the Indonesian National Arbitration Board. In 2021, the Seller files a lawsuit against the Buyer as the Defendant through the general court to request that the said share sale and purchase agreement be declared null and void and has no binding force. In their decision, the Panel of Judges stated that in essence the Central Jakarta District Court had no authority to try this case. Regarding the legal considerations, the assembly based the rules in Article 118 HIR and Article 3 of Law no. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This study uses a normative juridical approach with the results of the research showing that the enforceability of an arbitration clause in the form of a pactum de compromittendo is binding on the parties according to the pacta sunt servanda principle contained in Article 1338 Paragraph (1) of the Civil Code and the judge's decision as in its considerations is correct and has been according to law.
KEPAILITAN BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA PERSERO Ansari , Teuku Syahrul; Setiady, Tri; Astawa, I Ketut; Yunus, Muhammad
El-Iqthisadi Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/el-iqthisady.vi.52963

Abstract

Abstrak BUMN merupakan pelaku usaha strategis yang berkontribusi signifikan terhadap perekonomian nasional, namun masih berpotensi mengalami kebangkrutan jika tidak dikelola secara profesional. UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 Kepalailitan dan PKPUmengatur mekanisme pengajuan pailit BUMN, khususnya dalam Pasal 2 Ayat 5. Praktek pengadilan menunjukkan kompleksitas permasalahan, di mana beberapa putusan Pengadilan Niaga menolak permohonan kepailitan dari kreditur dengan alasan hanya Menkeu yang berwenang mengajukan permohonan. Kondisi ini mengindikasikan ketidakharmonisan dalam penanganan kasus kepailitan BUMN Persero. Penyebab utama ketidakselarasan ini adalah adanya konflik antar peraturan per-UU di bidang keuangan negara, perbendaharaan, kepailitan, BUMN, dan PT. Perbedaan interpretasi hukum di antara penegak hukum menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum, yang pada gilirannya dapat menghambat iklim investasi dan kepercayaan pelaku usaha terhadap BUMN. Oleh karena itu, perlu dilakukan harmonisasi peraturan perundang-undangan untuk menciptakan kejelasan dan kepastian hukum. Kata Kunci: BUMN, Persero, Kepailitan. Abstract BUMN is a strategic business actor that contributes significantly to the national economy, but still has the potential to go bankrupt if it is not managed professionally. UU KPKPU concerning KPPU regulates the mechanism for filing bankruptcy for BUMN, especially in Article 2 Paragraph 5. Court practice shows the complexity of the problem, where several Commercial Court decisions reject bankruptcy applications from creditors on the grounds that only the Minister of Finance has the authority to submit applications. This condition indicates disharmony in the handling of the BUMN Persero bankruptcy case. The main cause of this disharmony is the conflict between laws and regulations in the fields of state finance, treasury, bankruptcy, BUMN, and PT. Differences in legal interpretation between law enforcers create legal uncertainty, which in turn can hinder the investment climate and business actors' trust in BUMN. Therefore, it is necessary to harmonize laws and regulations to create legal clarity and certainty. Keywords: State-Owned Enterprises, Persero, Bankruptcy.
Co-Authors Astawa, I Ketut Hadipura, Margo Hadipura Iswari, Benny Muhammad Yunus Tri Setiady, Tri Victor, Indra Yudha Victor