Rifqa, Zakiyan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Resistance to Economic Oligarchy in the Al-Quran through the Lens of Tafsir Nuzuli Rifqa, Zakiyan; Shidqon, Alfan; Tumewu, Noufal P.
TAFSE: Journal of Qur'anic Studies Vol 8, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/tafse.v8i2.20585

Abstract

This article aims to examine the Quran's resistance to economic oligarchy by referencing the interpretations of Surah Al-Humazah and Al-Hashr: 7. Employing the tafsir Nuzuli approach from the perspective of Muhammad Abid al-Jabiri, the article delves into two main issues: Firstly, the review of the tafsir Nuzuli concerning economic principles in Surah Al-Humazah and al-Hashr verse 7. Secondly, the correlation between these verses and their contextualization in relation to economic oligarchy. The study adopts a literature review using a descriptive-analytical method. Based on an analysis of interpretation aspects, sabab nuzul, and the historical context of pre-Islamic Arabia, the study concludes that the verses articulate the Quran's opposition to economic oligarchy. The interpretation of Surah Al-Humazah condemns the propaganda of economic oligarchy perpetrators, specifically a group of pagan Quraisy elites. The interpretation of al-Hashr verse 7 reveals the wealth distribution policy implemented during the Prophet's leadership in Medina based on maslahah, ensuring the avoidance of concentrating wealth exclusively among a select few affluent individuals. The sabab nuzul of these verses, associated with the conditions of pre-Islamic Arabia, elucidates the Quranic vision of economic justice, allowing for its contextualization in the present era.
Menyoal Dekonstruksi Keadilan Sahabat: Kritik atas Muhammad Tahir Alibe Shidqon, Alfan; Rifqa, Zakiyan
El-Sunan: Journal of Hadith and Religious Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/el-sunan.v1i2.3844

Abstract

This article provides a review of 'Adalah al-Shahabah Kepada Rekonstruksi Definisi Sahabat: Kajian Kritis Mengenai Sahabat dalam Tinjauan Nas by Muhammad Tahir Alibe. In the article, Tahir presents two main points: a redefinition of the term "companions" and a rejection of the "all companions are fair" rule in hadith sanad criticism. The review in this article focuses on three key issues: Firstly, the negative portrayal of the history of the Companions. Secondly, the analysis of arguments supporting and opposing the fairness of the Companions. Thirdly, a critical assessment of the redefined term "companions." To accomplish these objectives, this article employs a comparative literature-based research approach. The findings of this review reveal: Firstly, the historical narrative of the Companions in Tahir's article demonstrates bias. Secondly, the mapping of pro and con arguments lacks balance. Thirdly, the proposal to redefine the term "sahabat" requires further examination. ABSTRAK Artikel ini berisi ulasan atas Dekonstruksi ‘Adalah al-Shahabah Kepada Rekonstruksi Definisi Sahabat: Kajian Kritis Mengenai Sahabat dalam Tinjauan Nas oleh Muhammad Tahir Alibe. Dalam artikel tersebut, Tahir menawarkan dua hal: pendefinisian ulang istilah sahabat dan penolakan atas kaidah “semua sahabat adil” dalam kritik sanad hadis. Ulasan dalam artikel ini berfokus pada tiga persoalan: Pertama, narasi negatif sejarah sahabat. Kedua, pemetaan argumentasi pro dan kontra terhadap keadilan sahabat. Ketiga, tinjauan kritis atas pendefinisian ulang istilah sahabat. Guna mencapai maksud tersebut, artikel ini menggunakan riset pustaka berbasis komparasi. Hasil dari ulasan ini menunjukkan: Pertama, narasi sejarah sahabat dalam artikel Tahir mengandung bias. Kedua, pemetaan argumentasi pro dan kontra kurang berimbang. Ketiga, tawaran pendefinisian ulang istilah sahabat perlu ditinjau ulang.
Asbāb al-Wurūd dan Double Movement: Menghidupkan Eksistensi Hadis di Era Modern Rifqa, Zakiyan
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v5i1-01

Abstract

This paper discusses the analysis of the concept of asbāb al-wurūd in hadith based on the thoughts of Lenni Lestari, Widia Putri, and Zakiyah, along with their colleagues. According to Lenni Lestari, the study of asbāb al-wurūd focuses primarily on the sources behind the emergence of the hadith, distinguishing between the sources of knowledge of asbāb al-wurūd and the sources of the events themselves. Meanwhile, Widia Putri emphasizes that asbāb al-wurūd plays a central role in shaping a solid understanding of Islam, as it serves as the contextual spirit in interpreting hadith texts. On the other hand, Zakiyah and her colleagues propose that a study based on the theory of double movement should be conducted to ensure the continued relevance of hadith in modern life. This research aims to review the relevance of Lenni Lestari, Widia Putri, and Zakiyah's ideas in underscoring the importance of the asbāb al-wurūd methodology as a tool to discover the ideal moral principles contained in hadith and to actualize them in the context of contemporary realities. To achieve this goal, this study employs a library research method with a qualitative approach. The results indicate that to revive the existence of hadith, a mechanism of double movement is necessary: returning to the socio-historical context of the Prophet's time to uncover the moral principles of hadith, and then bringing those principles into present-day reality through the process of contextualizing values. With this approach, hadith can maintain its relevance and vitality in the face of changing times.