Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

SPEECH ACTS ANALYSIS ON LILLY CONTINO’S COMPLAINT VIDEOS IN A RESTAURANT SETTING Dewi, Sinta; Astuti, Risa; Nursalam, Hafidatun; Meekaeo, Pisit
Journal of English Education and Linguistics Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Journal of English Education and Linguistics
Publisher : Program Studi Tadris Bahasa Inggris Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/jeel.v5i1.1729

Abstract

This study examines the use of Speech Acts complaining in Lilly Contino’s misgendering videos. Using Speech Acts categorizations by Searle (1969) and Moon’s (2002) complaining framework, the study aims to identify the strategy of complaints used by Lilly Contino and to examine its effectiveness. The study reveals that Lilly Contino used both implicit and explicit strategies. The implicit strategy used as an initial complaint by using assertive Speech Acts comprises reaffirming, recognizing, and stating, the explicit strategy used as a follow-up complaint by using directive Speech Acts includes demanding and requesting; and the expressive Speech Acts is used as well encompass Lilly’s personal feeling. It is also found that the implicit strategy is less effective for complaints rather than the explicit one. The study furthermore reveals that complaining has its level to address offensive situations. Therefore, this study is particularly useful for understanding the intent of complainers and how the hearer develops a suitable apology.
THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE 2013 CURRICULUM AND THE MERDEKA CURRICULUM: TEACHER’S UNDERSTANDING Afgany, Dea Marwah; Fajriah, Yustika Nur; Nursalam, Hafidatun; Soni, Mohammad
English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): December (EEAL Journal)
Publisher : IPI Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31980/eeal.v6i3.78

Abstract

Curriculum change is conducted as an effort to raise the standard of education. In Indonesia context, the education curriculum has been shifted from the 2013 Curriculum to the Merdeka Curriculum. This change brings out some pros and cons in which some teachers support this alteration, meanwhile, others say no to this change. In response to that claim, this research aimed to analyze the differences between the 2013 Curriculum and the Merdeka Curriculum from the teacher’s understanding. To achieve that goal this qualitative research was conducted through the use of semi- structured interviews as the data collection. The data were collected from an English teacher in one of the senior high schools in Garut, West Java. The result showed that the respondent has quite understood the difference between the 2013 curriculum and the Merdeka curriculum in the aspect of the general characteristics of the curriculum and the learning method used. Even the findings revealed that understanding of the curriculum can be captured more for the Merdeka curriculum than the 2013 curriculum, meaning that there are many aspects of the 2013 curriculum that the teacher has implemented but she still does not fully understand. In spite of these findings, the teacher claims that there are challenges such as insufficient infrastructure or supporting factors of facilities to help her in conducting the Merdeka curriculum