Amania, Malinda Hafizaturrizqo
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Review of the Marriage Law on Wahbah Zuhaili's Views on Misyar Marriage Amania, Malinda Hafizaturrizqo; Gusti Muzainah
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v7i2.12178

Abstract

Misyar marriage is a form of marriage in which, in practice, the wife does not receive the rights she should rightfully obtain from her husband, such as financial support and a place to live. Recently, misyar marriages have also occurred in Indonesia. There is a debate about the status and position of misyar marriages, with the majority of scholars considering them prohibited (haram), as the wife is deprived of certain rights. However, Wahbah az-Zuhaili is one scholar who holds a different view on the legality of misyar marriages. In his Fatawa Mu’ashirah, az-Zuhaili expresses his opinion on the permissibility of this type of marriage. This research is a normative legal study, specifically a library research approach. The research nature involves content analysis, and legal materials are collected through document studies. The Marriage Law in Indonesia has several provisions that are inconsistent with the practice of misyar marriages, including the purpose of marriage, marriage registration, rights and obligations of spouses, marriage agreements, and the requirements for husbands wishing to practice polygamy. In broad terms, the implementation of misyar marriages, when examined in various aspects within the Indonesian Marriage Law, is not in accordance. The author disagrees with Wahbah az-Zuhaili's view regarding the permissibility of such marriages. The author believes that this type of marriage tends to bring more harm than benefit. The government should actively participate in monitoring through authorized marriage institutions, and if possible, marriages of this nature should be prohibited in Indonesia.
Convergence and Divergence of Same-Sex Marriage Policies (A Comparative Study of Constitutional and Administration Law in Three Core Countries of the European Union) Amania, Malinda Hafizaturrizqo; Yazidi, Nur Syifa
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v9i3.18081

Abstract

Same-sex marriage has become one of the most prominent legal and social issues in recent decades, particularly within the European Union, which upholds the principles of non-discrimination and social integration. The Netherlands, France and Germany three core EU member states have all legalized same-sex marriage, yet each through different legal and policy trajectories. This article aims to examine the convergence and divergence of same-sex marriage policies in these countries through a constitutional and administrative law approach. Using a normative juridical method and comparative legal analysis, the study explores how domestic legal frameworks and sociopolitical dynamics shape the regulation of same-sex marriage. The findings indicate that although all three countries now recognize same-sex couples equally under the law, their legislative pathways, earlier forms of legal partnerships (such as registered partnerships and PACS) and their responses to social challenges such as discrimination reflect the distinct legal cultures and constitutional settings of each country. This shows that similar legal outcomes do not always emerge from identical processes, and that local factors continue to play a significant role in shaping legal policy, even in matters of global relevance like same-sex marriage.