Amalia, Ani
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Spasial Ordinary Kriging Persebaran Emas Berdasarkan Data Geokimia Permukaan Awak Mas, Sulawesi Selatan Amalia, Ani; Lepong, Piter; Natalisanto, Adrianus Inu
GEOSAINS KUTAI BASIN Vol 5 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Geophysics Study Program, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/geofisunmul.v5i2.798

Abstract

Kadar emas dapat diketahui dari hasil pengujian laboratorium dan atau dengan dilakukannya prediksi dengan teknik interpolasi Ordinary Kriging. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk estimasi penyebaran kadar emas di Awak Mas Project menggunakan data sekunder dari hasil channel dan sampling data permukaan. Tahapan yang dilakukan adalah dengan memilih model semivariogram terbaik diantara semivariogram Spherical, Eksponensial, dan Gaussian dan menafsirkan pola penyebaran mineral emas menggunakan metode geostatistik ordinary kriging berdasarkan data sampling channel mineralisasi emas permukaan. Langkah pertama dalam pengolahan data adalah membuat semivariogram menggunakan software SGEMS dengan nilai nugget, sill, dan range masing-masing sebesar 0,01, 0,1, dan 600. Kemudian diinterpolasi menggunakan ketiga model untuk mendapatkan model terbaik berdasarkan nilai RMSE terkecil, model yang didapatkan adalah model Gaussian. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pola penyebaran mineral emas permukaan banyak ditemukan pada daerah barat laut (NW) dan barat daya (SW) yang dipengaruhi oleh struktur geologi
JILBAB PERSPEKTIF QURAISH SHIHAB (STUDI KOMPARASI TAFSIR TULIS DAN LISAN) Amalia, Ani; Utami, Hilma Azmi; Munawir, Munawir; Fahrur Rozi, Ahmad
Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran dan Keislaman Vol 6, No 2 (2022): Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Keislaman
Publisher : Institut PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36671/mumtaz.v6i02.403

Abstract

This study will discuss the comparison between Written and Oral interpretations Of the Quraish shihab's hijab (jilbab) perspective. The Quraish Shihab's interpretation of the verses about the hijab caused a lot of controversy among commentators and scholars. He said that the veil was a must And He Also Said That It Was Not permissible because it cannot be said to be shari'ah without a clear text. In this research, the writer uses the method of over-the-top and long-winded orality and literacy. This feature keeps the listener focused and on the path of the story. It also aims to reveal the differences in the written intbn/ rpretation (Tafsir Al-Misbah) and the oral Quraish shihab. Through this method, the writer assumes that within a boundary there is a difference in meaning between written and oral interpretation. First, in Q.S Al-Ahzab verse 59 his written commentary Quraish Shihab only mentions the word genitalia once, but in his oral interpretation Quraish Shihab mentions the word genitalia repeatedly and ramblingly "aurat must still be covered, genitalia." Second, in Q.S An-Nur Verse 31 of his commentary Quraish shihab he only mentions the word "show" once. While in his oral interpretation, he mentions the word repeatedly or exaggerating. Third, in Q.S Al-A'raf verse 26 the word clothing has a meaning that is repeated, so that the quote contains exaggeration, length and rambling