Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsnormen Journal of Law Journal of Mandalika Social Science
Abadi, M. Husnu
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Electrical & Electronics Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Political Review by Parliament to Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws that have Been Tested by the Constitutional Court Abadi, M. Husnu
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55849/rjl.v2i2.555

Abstract

Background. The principle of the rule of law is embraced by Indonesia, which declares itself as a state of law, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia authorizes the Constitutional Court to test laws against the basic law. Method. This study is a normative study, with the approach of legislation and several cases. The type of data used is secondary data, with descriptive qualitative analysis. Results. The results of the study state that the use of the authority to review Perpu by the Constitutional Court is a material change in the constitution, which can reduce or deprive the constitutional rights of the DPR in using political review, or can cause the Perpu to be determined by the DPR is not in accordance with the original, because it has been tested first by the Constitutional Court. Conclusion. However, when the Constitutional Court, as the interpreter of the Constitution, declared its authority to test the constitutionality of Perpu, controversy arose: The Constitutional Court has deviated from the Constitution, and on the contrary, the Constitutional Court has been correct in interpreting the Constitution even though it has increased its authority.
Implikasi Atas Perubahan Sikap Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang yang Merupakan Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka, Melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 116/PUU-XXI/ 2023 Abadi, M. Husnu; Hajri, Wira Atma; Muslikhah, Umi
Journal of Mandalika Social Science Vol 2 No 2 (2024): Journal of Mandalika Social Science
Publisher : Mandalika Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/jomss.v3i1.147

Abstract

Sikap Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap pengujian undang-undang yang merupakan kebijakan hukum terbuka, telah berubah dengan dikemukakannya argumentasi baru, tentang pengertian atas salah satu prinsip konstitusi yaitu prinsip proporsionalitas. Putusan MK Ri No. 116/PUU-XXI/ 2023 telah menyatakan bahwa Pasal 416 ayat (1) UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum inkonstitutional bersyarat. Paper ini mengkaji implikasi putusan MK ini terhadap pelaksanaan UU No.7 Tahun 2017, khususnya yang berkenaan dengan Pasal 416 ayat (1) maupun kemungkinan perubahan sikap MK atas ketentuan Presidential Threshold (Pasal 222). Kajian ini merupakan kajian doktrinal, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, hasil penelitian yang relevan dengan kajian. Hasil kajian ini menyatakan bahwa pendirian Mahkamah Konstitusi akhirnya melakukan perubahan, dengan dikemukakannya argumentasi baru ketika memaknai sesuai tidaknya dengan konstitusi. Perubahan ini akan membuka peluang dimohonkannya kembali kasus-kasus pengujian tentang Presidential Threshold , yang selama ini ditolak oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Co-Authors Umi Muslikhah, Umi Wira Atma Hajri, Wira Atma