Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Evaluasi Usability Tableau Desktop Menggunakan Metode Nielsen’s Attributes of Usability (NAU) Ajang Sopandi; Wahyu, Angelica
JURNAL PERANGKAT LUNAK Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Perangkat Lunak
Publisher : Indragiri Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/jupel.v6i2.3315

Abstract

Tableau Desktop merupakan salah satu perangkat lunak yang biasanya digunakan dalam bidang business intelligence untuk mengelola data. Tableau Desktop telah menjadi alat penting bagi banyak bisnis untuk menganalisis dan memvisualisasikan data mereka. Namun, dalam beberapa kasus, kinerja tableau desktop yang lambat dapat menurunkan kinerja dan efisiensinya. Evaluasi usability yang dilakukan pada Tableau desktop bertujuan untuk memastikan bahwa Tableau Desktop dapat digunakan dengan mudah oleh pengguna dan membantu mereka mencapai tujuan pengguna. Salah satu metode yang relevan untuk evaluasi usability adalah Nielsen’s Attributes of Usability (NAU) karena Penggunaan model Nielsen dipilih agar permasalahan yang ditemukan nyata karena responden adalah pengguna yang sudah pernah menggunakan aplikasi tersebut. Dengan mengumpulkan data dari pengguna melalui kuesioner, akan mengevaluasi sejauh mana pengguna merasa dan efisien dalam menggunakan Tableau Desktop dan mengidentifikasi kekurangan dalam penggunaan Tableau Desktop. Hasil evaluasi ini dapat mengetahui pengujian terhadap pengguna mengenai usability secara lebih mendalam pada 5 kategori Nielsen`s model seperti mudah dipelajari, efisien digunakan, dan menyenangkan digunakan. Hasil dari evaluasi usability dapat memberikan wawasan yang berguna bagi pengembang dan pengguna Tableau Desktop.
Access to Higher Education for Persons with Disabilities: A Document Study and Thematic Analysis of Structural Barriers and Reasonable Accommodations Neneng Tati Sumiati; Ajang Sopandi; Asep Taufik Muharram; Cindy Rahayu; Siti Ummi Masruroh; Gina Sagita
Mimbar Agama Budaya Vol. 42 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Center for Research and Publication (PUSLITPEN), UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/mimbar.v42i2.50653

Abstract

Access to higher education for people with disabilities still faces structural and multidimensional barriers, as access does not stop at student admission but encompasses academic access, support services, information, and campus social participation. This study aims to map the main barriers and directions for improving higher education access policies for people with disabilities by referring to the non-discrimination and reasonable accommodation mandates in the CRPD. The method used is qualitative research based on document studies through thematic analysis of normative documents and authoritative reports (CRPD, OECD), as well as evidence of national and cross-country educational inequality (UNICEF Indonesia, World Bank). The results show that access to higher education is influenced by (1) uneven support and accommodation across institutions, which often makes meeting needs dependent on campus capacity; and (2) pipeline issues resulting from inequalities at previous levels, marked by low participation and graduation rates for groups with disabilities, thus narrowing opportunities to advance to higher education. These findings emphasize the need for an integrated access policy through minimum standardization of academic accommodations, strengthening disability service units, simplifying support procedures, and transition strategies from secondary education to higher education so that equal access can be achieved sustainably.
Segmentation of Adult Respondents’ Well-being Profiles Based on Daily Stress, Social Networks, Personal Resources, and Lifestyle Using Clustering Method Ajang Sopandi; Siti Ummi Masruroh; Neneng Tati Sumiati; Cindy Rahayu; Rona Nisa Sofia Amriza; Doni Febrian
The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning Vol 7 No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Pusbindiklatren Bappenas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46456/jisdep.v7i1.1071

Abstract

Existing literature on the topic of wellbeing mostly utilized scales and methods that are abstract and variable-centered yet assume homogeneity within the population being studied. This research utilizes a person-centered approach to classify the sample of 15,977 adults from a large-scale online survey about their wellbeing according to variables related to their stress, social networks, personal resources, and lifestyle. Factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD) is performed to reduce 22 variables of mixed types to 14 principal components that account for 77.51% of the variance in the data. Using these components, eight segments of well-being are classified by K-Means clustering and validated using Silhouette analysis. These segments range from those with low levels of stress, high levels of meditation, and clear goals for their lives to those with high levels of stress, no sense of accomplishment in their careers, and few social connections outside of work. Interestingly, another variable that was revealed as significantly different within each of the stress levels groups was the notion of whether or not the individual feels like they have enough money to cover their needs. Finally, the methods used in this research can be replicated to evaluate the wellbeing of the general population and to inform the creation of interventions to improve the lives of those with certain types of wellbeing profiles.