Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.888
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PROBLEMATIKA DIHIDUPKANNYA KEMBALI PATEN YANG TELAH DIHAPUS BERDASARKAN PASAL 141 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PATEN Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 9 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v9i1.16643

Abstract

Hak paten dapat dihapuskan dengan beberapa alasan, beberapa diantaranya adalah karena tidak memenuhi syratat substantif dan pemilik paten tidak membayar biaya tahunan. Penghapusan paten berakibat hilangnya hak eklusif yang dimiliki pemegang paten, hal ini tentu merugikan pihak-pihak yang berkepentingan, seperti pemilik paten itu sendiri atau penerima lisensi paten tersebut. Namun, Berdasarkan Pasal 141 Undang-undang No.13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Paten, sebuah paten yang sudah dihapuskan tidak dapat dihidupkan kembali kecuali berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Niaga. Tulisan yang menggunakan metode penulisan normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan ini akan membahas dua permasalahan akibat ambigunya Pasal 141 tersebut diatas, yaitu problematika apa saja yang akan muncul dalam pelaksanaanya mengingat selain pasal tersebut tidak ada lagi peraturan lain, sedangkan mekanisme dan syarat dihidupkannya paten tidak diatur pada Pasal 141. Untuk itu perlu dibahas pula tentang bagaimana penyelesaiannya. Adapun kesimpulan yang dapat dirumuskan terkait permasalahan tersebut yaitu, karena tidak ada batasan terhadap kewenangan hakim dalam menentukan dihidupkannya kembali paten yang telah dihapus, maka hakim dapat menghidupkan kembali sebuah paten tanpa landasan hukum yang kuat dan mungkin akan muncul perbedaan putusan untuk kasus yang sama, oleh karenanya perlu segera dibuat peraturan yang mengatur batasan dan persyaratan sebuah paten yang telah dihapus dapat dihidupkan kembali, beserta batasan kewenangan dari hakim dalam memutus dapat tidaknya sebauah paten dihidupkan kembali. Kata kunci: Problematika, Paten yang dihidupkan
PENGARUH TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP KEPEMILIKAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL: The Influence of Technology on Intellectual Property Ownership Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 11 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/prio.v11i2.20049

Abstract

One of the impacts of rapid technological advancement is the emergence of anti-mainstream thinking. In 2015, an animal protection organization declared that Naruto, a Bornean monkey, had the right to copyright for his own selfie. As Artificial Intelligence technology developed rapidly and its performance surpassed human capabilities, it was argued that Artificial Intelligence should be entitled to Intellectual Property Rights. This paper uses normative research methods with legislative and case approaches. Based on several theories, it can be concluded that a legal subject is anything that can hold rights and obligations under the law. Technically, Artificial Intelligence can indeed perform many tasks usually done by humans, but it must be noted that Artificial Intelligence cannot enjoy its rights and fulfill its obligations. Artificial Intelligence is still a technology in the form of a computer system resulting from human innovation, not something that exists by itself. Therefore, Artificial Intelligence cannot be granted any rights, including Intellectual Property Rights, because the concept of Intellectual Property Rights is a right given to anyone who engages in intellectual activities and produces intellectual works. This right is given so that intellectual work owners can gain economic benefits, promoting the creation of sustainable Intellectual Property products.
PELAKSANAAN PATEN OLEH UNIVERSITAS TRISAKTI SEBAGAI PEMEGANG PATEN BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PATEN: Implementation of Patents by Trisakti University as a Patent Holder Based on Law 13 of 2016 on Patents Grace; Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i1.22128

Abstract

All Patent Rights Holders have obligations that must be carried out, namely paying annual patent maintenance fees and implementing the patents they own, as written in article 20 and article 132 of Law Number 13 of 2016 paragraph (1) letter (e).  If it is violated, the result is that the patent can be invalidated based on a court decision, then how is the implementation of Trisakti University's patent in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents? This article's research type uses descriptive normative legal research, using secondary and primary data with interviews with IPR Consultants, DJKI staff, Patent Inventors at Trisakti University, as well as interviews with staff at the Research and Innovation Institute of Muhammadiyah University, Surakarta. Data was collected through literature study which was analyzed using qualitative methods, by drawing conclusions deductively. The results of the discussion and conclusions of this article show that not much effort has been made to implement patents by Trisakti University as the patent holder. One of the obstacles is that patent implementation has not yet become a work program at universities, there is a lack of funds and facilities to be able to implement patents, and many inventors do not yet understand their obligations after a patent is granted.
HAK DESAIN TATA LETAK SIRKUIT TERPADU PADA IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA ENKRIPSI BC3 DI INDONESIA: Integrated Circuit Layout Design Rights In The Implementation Of The Bc3 Encryption Algorithm In Indonesia Vania Agata; Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i2.19719

Abstract

Integrated circuit layout design (DTLST) is one of the relatively new forms of intellectual property, especially in the context of Industrial Property Rights. Law No. 32 of 2000 regulates the layout design of integrated circuits. The first DTLST certificate was granted by DJKI Kemenkhumham in 2018 with certificate number IDL000000001 to Dr. Eng. Sarwono Sutikno and team. The problem formulation in this article is how the legal protection process of Layout Design of BC3 Encryption Algorithm Implementation on Hardware with DTLST Number IDL000000001 according to Law No. 32 of 2000 concerning DTLST and whether that design has qualified as an Integrated Circuit Layout Design. The research uses normative legal research methods, with secondary and primary data. Based on the results of the study, the Layout Design of BC3 Encryption Algorithm Implementation on Hardware has protection for 10 years since October 30th, 2018, where the protection is obtained from the date of acceptance because no commercial exploitation is carried out. The conclusion is that The Layout Design of BC3 Encryption Algorithm Implementation on Hardware is a work that has passed the checking process by DJKI, where this design has passed and meets the originality requirements.
Co-Authors Grace Vania Agata