Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.151
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Reformasi Hukum Trisakti

 1 
PELAKSANAAN PATEN OLEH UNIVERSITAS TRISAKTI SEBAGAI PEMEGANG PATEN BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PATEN: Implementation of Patents by Trisakti University as a Patent Holder Based on Law 13 of 2016 on Patents Grace; Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i1.22128

Abstract

All Patent Rights Holders have obligations that must be carried out, namely paying annual patent maintenance fees and implementing the patents they own, as written in article 20 and article 132 of Law Number 13 of 2016 paragraph (1) letter (e).  If it is violated, the result is that the patent can be invalidated based on a court decision, then how is the implementation of Trisakti University's patent in accordance with Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents? This article's research type uses descriptive normative legal research, using secondary and primary data with interviews with IPR Consultants, DJKI staff, Patent Inventors at Trisakti University, as well as interviews with staff at the Research and Innovation Institute of Muhammadiyah University, Surakarta. Data was collected through literature study which was analyzed using qualitative methods, by drawing conclusions deductively. The results of the discussion and conclusions of this article show that not much effort has been made to implement patents by Trisakti University as the patent holder. One of the obstacles is that patent implementation has not yet become a work program at universities, there is a lack of funds and facilities to be able to implement patents, and many inventors do not yet understand their obligations after a patent is granted.
HAK DESAIN TATA LETAK SIRKUIT TERPADU PADA IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA ENKRIPSI BC3 DI INDONESIA: Integrated Circuit Layout Design Rights In The Implementation Of The Bc3 Encryption Algorithm In Indonesia Vania Agata; Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i2.19719

Abstract

Integrated circuit layout design (DTLST) is one of the relatively new forms of intellectual property, especially in the context of Industrial Property Rights. Law No. 32 of 2000 regulates the layout design of integrated circuits. The first DTLST certificate was granted by DJKI Kemenkhumham in 2018 with certificate number IDL000000001 to Dr. Eng. Sarwono Sutikno and team. The problem formulation in this article is how the legal protection process of Layout Design of BC3 Encryption Algorithm Implementation on Hardware with DTLST Number IDL000000001 according to Law No. 32 of 2000 concerning DTLST and whether that design has qualified as an Integrated Circuit Layout Design. The research uses normative legal research methods, with secondary and primary data. Based on the results of the study, the Layout Design of BC3 Encryption Algorithm Implementation on Hardware has protection for 10 years since October 30th, 2018, where the protection is obtained from the date of acceptance because no commercial exploitation is carried out. The conclusion is that The Layout Design of BC3 Encryption Algorithm Implementation on Hardware is a work that has passed the checking process by DJKI, where this design has passed and meets the originality requirements.
KEPEMILIKAN RAHASIA DAGANG FORMULA CAT RAMBUT: Ownership Of Hair Dye Formula Trade Secret Viranda Mirella; Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v8i1.25173

Abstract

Trade secrets constitute assets of significant economic value requiring comprehensive legal protection, particularly within the salon industry where hair dye formulas serve as a primary competitive advantage. The problem regarding the entitlement to ownership of hair dye formula trade secrets within a salon based on Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets. The research methodology employed is normative legal research, utilizing both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Primary legal materials include Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets, whereas secondary legal materials; treatises pertaining to intellectual property rights. The result of this research indicate that Law Number 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets lacks specific provisions governing the ownership of trade secrets arising from an employment relationship, as otherwise regulated under copyright and patent regimes. However, it can be concluded that in the event a hair dye formula is conceived by a stylist without the utilization of salon facilities, the trade secret shall vest in the stylist. Consequently, the ownership of hair dye formula trade secrets in salons is determined by several legal criteria, inter alia: the creator of  formula, the existence of an employment or licensing agreement, and security measures implemented by proprietor of information
Co-Authors Grace Vania Agata Viranda Mirella