Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implikasi Penggunaan Bahan Berbahaya Dan Beracun (B3) Dalam Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Dasar Rumah Tangga Terhadap Lingkungan Andre Rizaldy; Irwan Triadi
JURNAL WILAYAH, KOTA DAN LINGKUNGAN BERKELANJUTAN Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL WILAYAH, KOTA DAN LINGKUNGAN BERKELANJUTAN
Publisher : Fakultas Teknik Universitas Cenderawasih

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58169/jwikal.v3i1.396

Abstract

The 1945 Constitution or the Constitution states that a good living environment is everyone's right. This is regulated in Article 28H paragraph (1). Mutatis mutandis, a good living environment is everyone's constitutional right, in this caseIndonesian society cannot be reduced. The research method used in this writing is a normative juridical method with a literature study approach which is legal research that focuses on legal norms including principles, norms, rules, laws and regulations, agreements and doctrine. However, nowadays there is a lot of environmental damage due to the use of B3 materials (Hazardous and Toxic Substances) for household purposes either directly or indirectly, this can be a factor in the constitutional rights of a citizen whoThis action has been reduced, therefore in this article the author will discuss the implications for the environment in the use of B3 materials to meet needs.
Legal Synchronization of Bankruptcy Asset Distribution: Prioritizing Workers Over State Taxes (An Analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 67/PUU-XI/2013 Regarding the Position of Workers and State Taxes in Bankruptcy Asset Distribution) Andre Rizaldy; Muthia Sakti; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i2.194

Abstract

This study examines the legal conflict between workers' wage claims and state tax obligations in bankruptcy proceedings under Indonesian law, focusing on the constitutional imperative to prioritize workers' rights. The Introduction contextualizes the tension between Article 95(4) of the Labor Law, which mandates wage prioritization, and tax legislation granting precedence to state claims, highlighting the landmark Constitutional Court Decision No. 67/PUU-XI/2013 that affirmed workers' constitutional rights to timely wages. Employing a Method of normative legal research, the analysis integrates statutory and case approaches, reviewing laws on bankruptcy (UU No. 37/2004), labor rights, and taxation, alongside judicial decisions and international frameworks like ILO Conventions No. 100 and 111. Results reveal that while the Constitutional Court’s decision established workers’ absolute priority over tax claims, regulatory disharmony persists due to conflicting provisions in the Tax Law (UU KUP) and the 2020 Job Creation Law (UU Cipta Kerja), which ambiguously subordinates tax claims only to secured creditors. Discussion underscores the necessity for legal synchronization to align labor and tax regulations, ensuring compliance with Gustav Radbruch’s principles of legal certainty and Hans Kelsen’s normative hierarchy. The study advocates legislative reforms to codify workers’ priority in bankruptcy, drawing parallels with Malaysia’s Employment Act 1955 and France’s AGS system, which institutionalize wage protection. By addressing regulatory contradictions, Indonesia can harmonize constitutional mandates with fiscal policies, balancing social justice and economic stability.