Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Novum : Jurnal Hukum
Dananjaya, I Putu Gede Adhi
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of the Inconsistency of The Constitutional Court’s Decision on Resolution of Regional Election Result Disputes Dananjaya, I Putu Gede Adhi; Sulaksono, Sulaksono
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 12 No. 02 (2025): Novum : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v1i1.60253

Abstract

The difference between election (Pemilu) and regional head election (Pilkada) systems stems from Constitutional Court decision No. 97/PUU-XI/2013. This decision states that the Constitutional Court does not have the authority to handle disputes over election results, unless a Specialized Judicial Body has not been established. However, the question is whether the Constitutional Court is still authorized to handle disputes over election results after Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022, and whether there needs to be an adjustment regarding this authority in the 1945 Constitution. In this context, the understanding of the meaning of elections also needs to be studied after Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022. Through a normative approach and by using primary and secondary legal sources, this study concludes that after Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022, the distinction between the two regimes has disappeared, so that the Constitutional Court has the authority to permanently handle disputes over election results.
Co-Authors Sulaksono, Sulaksono