Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Kristofel Aditiya Prathama Pardamean Hutauruk
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparison of Sanctions for the Crime of Persecution According to the Kerinci Customary Criminal Law and the Indonesian Criminal Law Ade Saptomo; Nana Lukmana; Riza Endriyana; I Gede Sumerta; Kristofel Aditiya Prathama Pardamean Hutauruk
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 2 No 2 (2024): April: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/jaksa.v2i2.1688

Abstract

This research discusses the application of Kerinci customary criminal law to criminal acts of abuse and its comparison with national criminal law in Indonesia. There is a conflict between Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code and the practice of resolving customary abuse in Kerinci Regency. The research method used is normative legal research with a conceptual and analytical approach. The research results show differences in the application of customary and national crimes, with an emphasis on the principle of deliberation in Kerinci customary law. The application of Kerinci's customary crime involves three levels of sanctions, adjusted to the level of the violation, with a Restorative Justice approach. Differences arise in the resolution of minor criminal cases, where customary law involves traditional judges, ninik mamak, and traditional leaders. Harmonization between customary law and national law is crucial to achieving holistic justice.
Comparison of Sanctions for the Crime of Persecution According to the Kerinci Customary Criminal Law and the Indonesian Criminal Law Ade Saptomo; Nana Lukmana; Riza Endriyana; I Gede Sumerta; Kristofel Aditiya Prathama Pardamean Hutauruk
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): April: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/jaksa.v2i2.1688

Abstract

This research discusses the application of Kerinci customary criminal law to criminal acts of abuse and its comparison with national criminal law in Indonesia. There is a conflict between Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code and the practice of resolving customary abuse in Kerinci Regency. The research method used is normative legal research with a conceptual and analytical approach. The research results show differences in the application of customary and national crimes, with an emphasis on the principle of deliberation in Kerinci customary law. The application of Kerinci's customary crime involves three levels of sanctions, adjusted to the level of the violation, with a Restorative Justice approach. Differences arise in the resolution of minor criminal cases, where customary law involves traditional judges, ninik mamak, and traditional leaders. Harmonization between customary law and national law is crucial to achieving holistic justice.
Co-Authors Ade Saptomo I Gede Sumerta Nana Lukmana Riza Endriyana