Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Indonesia's Presidential Threshold As Open Legal Policy In Election: As A Base For Muslim Studies Anggar Putra
Jurnal Al Tasyri'iyyah VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2, DECEMBER 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jat.vi.28791

Abstract

Since its inception in the 2004 general election until the simultaneous general election in 2019, the use of standardization of presidential and vice presidential nominations, also known as the presidential threshold system, has garnered numerous benefits and drawbacks. Thus far, the writers have established that the presidential threshold system is an open legal policy (open legal policy) that does not violate the Republic of Indonesia's constitution or is constitutional. The purpose of this article is to examine the presidential threshold's compliance with an open legal policy from the standpoint of Islamic law. The research employs a legal-normative as well as a theological or syar'i approach. The study's findings indicate that the presidential threshold was established in conformity with open legal policy principles strengthened by Constitutional Court Decision 14/PUU-XI/2013. The presidential threshold system is one of the measures to strengthen the presidential system and simplify political parties, thereby enhancing long-term governance and promoting the legislative and executive institutions' professionalism in their performance. According to siyasa syariyyah, one must be a descendant of the Quraysh tribe in order to apply as a state or imamate leader. However, this requirement is not absolute; if one has been permitted to become a leader, one does not have to be a descendant of the Quraysh tribe in order to eliminate the sense of ashabiyah. Meanwhile, the presidential threshold system ensures full uniformity in order to allow for the nomination of candidates for state leaders (president and vice president). Keywords: Open Legal Policy; Presidential Thresholds; General election
CONFLICT OF INTEREST KETUA HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TELAAH PUTUSAN NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Anggar Putra; Saiful
Journal of Excellence Humanities and Religiosity Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): July (2024)
Publisher : Journal of Excellence Humanities and Religiosity

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/joehr.v1i2.214

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 menuai pro-kontra, pasalnya putusan tersebut memuat konflik kepentingan (conflict of interest) Ketua Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi (Anwar Usman). Karena, menguntungkan salah satu pihak, yakni Gibran Rakabuming Raka yang merupakan keponakan dari Anwar Usman (Hakim Ketua) untuk maju dalam pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden 2024. Penelitian menggunakan metode analisis-deskriptif dengan pendekatan empiris, yuridis-normatif, dan pendekatan teologi (syari’ah). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan adanya konflik kepentingan (conflict of interest) Ketua Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi berdasarkan telaah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 yang mengesampingkan asas nemo judex idoneus in propria causa dan Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 09/PMK/2006 tentang Pemberlakuan Deklarasi Kode Etik dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi. Menurut prinsip tersebut, hakim konstitusi harus mengundurkan diri dari pemeriksaan suatu perkara apabila hakim tersebut tidak dapat atau dianggap tidak mampu bersikap adil dan tidak berpihak karena anggota keluarganya mempunyai kepentingan langsung (conflict of interest) terhadap putusan. Dalam hukum Islam, memperingatkan setiap orang yang berprofesi sebagai hakim harus berlaku adil, bekerja semaksimal mungkin dan berusaha mencapai kesempurnaan dalam memutuskan sesuatu. Kata Kunci: Conflict of Interest, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Putusan Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023
Analisis Konstitusionalitas Pengujian Ex-Ante Review Perspektif Siyasah Syar'iyyah di Indonesia Anggar Putra
Journal of Excellence Humanities and Religiosity Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January (2025)
Publisher : Journal of Excellence Humanities and Religiosity

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/joehr.v2i1.309

Abstract

Tujuan Penelitian ini untuk menganalisis konstitusionalitas pengujian ex-ante review dalam perspektif siyasah syariyyah. Masalah dalam penelitian ini banyaknya peraturan perundang-undangan yang dilakukan judicial review di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Adapun metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara identifikasi, reduksi, dan editing. Hasil dalam penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Pengujian ex-ante review dalam mewujudkan konstitusionlitas undang-undang di Indonesia perlu dipertimbangkan kembali untuk diterapkan. Karena, pengujian ex-ante review tidak ada landasan konstitusional baik dalam UUD NRI 1945, Undang-undang, dan peraturan lainya. Selanjutnya, tidak ada kejelasan secara formil dan materiil terkait obyek dan subyek pengujian. Dalam kajian fiqh siyasah pengujian ex-ante review masuk dalam wilayah siyasah dusturiyah, karena berkaitan dengan pembentukan dan pelaksanaan undang-undang oleh lembaga legislatif, eksekutif, dan yudikatif. Pengujian ex-ante review dalam fiqh siyasah bisa diterapkan dengan berpedoman pada kaidah fiqh yakni, “kebijakan seorang pemimpin terhadap rakyatnya bergantung kepada kemashlahatan”. Artinya, dengan alasan kemaslahatan umat, maka tujuan utama dari setiap kebijakan hukum atau aturan hukum yang dibentuk dalam negara Islam adalah kemaslahatan umat dan menghindari adanya kemudharatan atau suatu yang membahayakan umat.
Rule of Islamic Law dan Mekanisme Penambahan Kewenangan Constitutional Complaint Mahkamah Konstitusi Anggar Putra
Bulletin of Community Engagement Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Bulletin of Community Engagement
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/bce.v4i3.1440

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is the guardian of the constitution, the final interpreter of the constitution, the protector of human rights, the protector of the citizen's constitutional rights), protector of democracy (the protector of democracy). These five authorities place the Constitutional Court as the sole guardian of citizens' constitutional rights which are comprehensively explained in the law. The Constitutional Court as the enforcer of "constitutional supremacy" and the interpretation that the Constitution does not only contain basic norms, but actually within the body of these norms there are principles and morality which are the main pillars of creating the ideals of a state that upholds the law. Although in reality the Constitutional Court has not been able to accommodate all the aspirations of the people universally. However, with the expansion of the Constitutional Court's authority to examine Constitutional Complaints, it is an extraordinary legal effort in fighting for and defending constitutional rights. This research is normative-Juridical research, with a statute approach and Islamic nomocracy. The data source used is library research. The results in this study, there is a mechanism for adding a constitutional complaint by amending the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, amending Article 29 paragraph (1) UU/48/2009, and amending Article 10 UU/24/2003. The findings in this study, there are opportunities and mechanisms for adding constitutional complaint authority by carrying out Legislative Interpretation efforts.