Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Abnormal Return, Trading Volume Activity, Dan Bid-Ask Spread Pada Perusahaan Yang Melakukan Stock Split Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Lestari, Andi Indah; Azwad, Nugraha Abhull; Bakri Katti, Siti Wardhani; Djabir, Muh
BUGIS : Journal of Business, Technology, & Social Science Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Bugis Journal
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) IBK Nitro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56858/bugis.v2i1.217

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan Abnormal Return, Trading Volume Activity, Dan Bid-Ask Spread sebelum dan setelah melakukan Stock Split. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sampel jenuh dimana ada 12 perusahaan dengan mengambil 15 hari kerja sebelum dan 15 hari kerja setelah melakukan Stock Split.Adapun metode analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah analisis Paired Sample T Test dengan bantuan SPSS versi 25.0 Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan abnormal return sebelum dan setelah stock split. Tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan trading volume activity sebelum dansetelah stock split. Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan bid-ask spread sebelum dan setelah perusahaan melakukan stock split
Analysis of Social and Environmental Impact Measurement Difficulties in Green Investment and Sustainable Finance Djafar, Djafar; Tabsir, Muhammad Kusnady; Rachmawaty, Rachmawaty; Djabir, Muh; Pratiwi Ar, Dhita
Advances in Management & Financial Reporting Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): June - September
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Bukhari Dwi Muslim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60079/amfr.v3i3.610

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the challenges in measuring social and environmental impacts in green investment and sustainable finance, with a focus on methodological inconsistencies, data quality, and the application of sustainability standards. It also explores the gap between theoretical frameworks and their practical implementation in corporate sustainability reporting. Research Method: The research employed a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to synthesize existing studies and identify recurring challenges in impact assessment methodologies. The SLR integrated theoretical perspectives, such as stakeholder and legitimacy theories, to connect the findings to established frameworks, highlighting their practical limitations in real-world applications. Results and Discussion: The study revealed significant inconsistencies in the methodologies used for impact measurement, including the limitations of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Issues with data quality, such as reliance on self-reported data without adequate third-party verification, compromised the reliability of sustainability claims. Additionally, varying and ambiguous sustainability standards were shown to create confusion and potential greenwashing. The findings highlight the disparity between theoretical frameworks and their practical application, which undermines stakeholder trust and organizational legitimacy. Implications: This research contributes to academic knowledge by providing an integrated view of current challenges in sustainability impact measurement. It recommends adopting mixed-methods approaches and advanced technologies, such as blockchain, to improve transparency and reliability in sustainability reporting. The study suggests that aligning methodologies with comprehensive theoretical frameworks can enhance corporate practices and bolster stakeholder confidence in sustainability claims.