Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.066
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah
Nainggolan, Marsudin
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi fungsi pencegahan terjadinya tindak pidana korupsiPada bank badan usaha milik negara (bumn) Te’dang, Yonika Winner; Nainggolan, Marsudin; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, Februari 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/cendekia.v2i2.958

Abstract

The function of preventing corruption crimes at SOE Banks has not been maximized so far. This is due to the lack of supervision and accountability carried out by the SOE Bank, which causes corruption crimes committed by the SOE Bank officers. The research method used by the researcher uses a qualitative research method where the data will be analyzed descriptively to explain the existing data and associate one data with another. The results of the existing research explain that so far the function of preventing corruption at SOE Banks is still not optimal because the implementation of supervision and accountability has not been carried out properly by the SOE Bank officers. As a result of the lack of a function to prevent criminal acts through supervision and accountability, it is very vulnerable to corruption crimes as has happened at Bank BRI Yos Sudarso Branch Office, Palangka Raya. The occurrence of corruption crimes committed by BRI Staff of Yos Sudarso Branch Office resulted in state losses so that the perpetrators must be given criminal penalties as stipulated in the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Therefore, it is important to establish a reconstruction of the function of preventing corruption crimes at SOE Banks in the form of maximizing the implementation of supervision and accountability by the officers of the SOE Bank. By maximizing supervision and accountability, the prevention function can be carried out and corruption crimes in state-owned banks can be prevented and minimized
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Turut Serta Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Penerimaan Suap Oleh Hakim Oktafianto, Wahyu Dwi; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Nainggolan, Marsudin
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, Februari 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/cendekia.v2i2.967

Abstract

The rise of criminal acts of corruption, especially in the world of justice, will certainly seriously harm justice for society. The judiciary, which should be a place for people to seek justice, has now become a transactional institution by a handful of certain individuals and the judicial mafia. The criminal act of corruption in accepting bribes by judges of course does not only involve the judge himself, of course it will involve other parties, namely those closest to him or those he trusts who both work as judges or civil servants and can even involve private parties. Therefore, these other parties must also be held criminally responsible for their actions, namely as participating perpetrators (medeplegen) by applying the doctrine of deelneming based on Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code (KUHP). This research is normative juridical research with a statutory approach, a case approach, a historical approach and a comparative approach and uses the theory of criminal liability and the theory of deelneming. In its development, there have been many different views for judges in deciding cases of participating perpetrators who do not have certain qualities as stated in the article in which they are charged. In the teaching of deelneming, what needs to be seen and proven is the role and action (actus reus and mens rea) of the participating actor, not looking at who or the quality of the participating actor. The expansion of inclusion or participation should be based on the concept of knowledge and agreeing which is not seen simply as evil thoughts or evil intentions (mens rea) of the perpetrator but is placed directly on the role and actions (actus reus) as a new form of deelneming or participation.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perampasan Aset Pihak Ketiga Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Abdullah, Zulfirman; Nainggolan, Marsudin; Ismed, Mohamad
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, Februari 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/cendekia.v2i2.969

Abstract

Money laundering is a form of economic crime with broad impacts, both individually and systemically. This crime often involves third parties who are not directly engaged in the criminal act. One of the primary legal issues that arise is the confiscation of assets belonging to third parties who have no involvement in the crime, raising concerns regarding the protection of their legal rights. This study aims to analyze the existing legal framework, challenges, and potential solutions in providing legal protection for third parties harmed by asset confiscation in money laundering cases. The author employs a normative juridical research method with an analytical approach, referencing theories of criminal liability and legal protection.  This research relies on secondary data, including statutory regulations, legal documents, and judicial decisions, such as the Supreme Court’s Judicial Review Decision No. 365 PK/Pid.Sus/2022 dated May 23, 2022, concerning Andika Surachman and associates (owners of First Travel), and the Supreme Court’s Cassation Decision No. 4101 K/Pid.Sus/2024 dated July 16, 2024, concerning the defendant Rafael Alun Trisambodo. This study also evaluates the relevance of Law No. 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering (UU TPPU) in safeguarding the rights of bona fide third parties.  The findings indicate that while the UU TPPU acknowledges the potential involvement of third parties in money laundering cases, its provisions remain limited and do not comprehensively safeguard bona fide third parties. This research identifies solutions to enhance legal protection against arbitrary law enforcement practices, such as revising existing regulations and strengthening the mechanism for objections to asset confiscation. Theoretically, this study contributes to the development of criminal law concepts, particularly regarding the protection of third-party rights in asset confiscation related to money laundering offenses. Practically, the findings of this study are expected to serve as a guideline for policymakers and law enforcement agencies in formulating fairer and more effective legal policies while ensuring that individuals who are not involved in criminal activities remain legally protected
PENJATUHAN PIDANA DENDA TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK HUKUM DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA Putri, Rindu Yusticia Puspaning; Nainggolan, Marsudin; Basuki, Basuki
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1649

Abstract

Children have a strategic position in ensuring the survival of a nation, so that legal protection for children is a state obligation as stated in Article 28B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Republic of Indonesia Constitution and the Convention on the Rights of the Child which has been ratified through Presidential Decree Number 36 of 1990. In the context of criminal justice, children involved in narcotics crimes must receive legal treatment in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the child. Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System has regulated that for children who are sentenced to imprisonment and fines, the fine must be replaced with job training. However, in practice, there is still a discrepancy between normative provisions (das Sollen) and the reality of law enforcement (das Sein), such as in Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2014/PN.Pli and Decision Number 98/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN.Plg, which imposes a fine on children without applying a substitute punishment in the form of job training as mandated by the SPPA Law. The formulation of the problem raised in this study is how the criminalization system for children in conflict with the law in cases of drug abuse and how to enforce the law against children in conflict with the law in cases of drug abuse. In this study, the author uses the double track system theory and law enforcement theory as analytical tools in this study. The research method used is a normative legal approach. This study uses a statute approach, a case approach, a conceptual approach, and an analytical approach, which in principle are sourced from primary legal materials consisting of laws and judges' decisions, secondary legal materials consisting of books, research results, articles and tertiary legal materials from libraries, articles and websites. The legal material analysis technique uses grammatical interpretation techniques.. The results of the study on the punishment of children in several cases of drug abuse have not fully implemented the principle of restorative justice as mandated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA), this shows a disparity in court decisions. In several cases, children who were proven to be abusers were sentenced to prison and large fines, while in other cases children who acted as couriers or intermediaries were not subject to fines. The suggestion in this study is that it is necessary to harmonize and synchronize Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning SPPA as a legal basis so that there is no longer the application of fines that are not in accordance with special provisions in juvenile justice, and in addition, it is necessary to increase the capacity and understanding of law enforcement officers, both investigators, public prosecutors, and judges, regarding the application of the principle of the double track system and restorative justice in handling child cases, especially in cases of drug abuse
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pengancaman dan Pemerasan Beatrix, Anna; Nainggolan, Marsudin; Basuki, Basuki
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 17, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v17i2.271

Abstract

Legal protection for victims of criminal threats and extortion is a crucial aspect in ensuring a fair judicial process. This article discusses the challenges and solutions in providing legal protection for victims through a legal and technological approach. Based on an analysis of the Witness and Victim Protection Law, it is found that there are still obstacles in accessing justice for victims, particularly for economically disadvantaged individuals. Moreover, firm law enforcement against perpetrators, the utilization of information technology in handling crimes through electronic media, and enhancing the legal awareness of victims are also focal points in improving the legal protection system. On the other hand, the active role of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency is expected to enhance protection for victims by prioritizing their interests in the judicial process. Through collaborative efforts among the government, protection agencies, and public legal awareness, it is hoped that legal protection for victims can be enhanced to achieve better justice.
PEMENUHAN RESTITUSI OLEH PELAKU KEPADA ANAK KORBAN KEKERASAN SEKSUAL Diastu, Ketut; Nainggolan, Marsudin; Ismed, Mohamad
Community Development Journal : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Volume 5 No 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cdj.v5i1.25659

Abstract

Restitusi sangat penting bagi anak korban kekerasan seksual, karena anak yang menjadi korban sangat kehilangan hakaknya untuk mendapatkan kehidupan yang aman, nyaman dan sehat. Dengan demikian maka sangat perlu diperhatikan terkait restitusi anak korban kekerasan seksual. Dengan dipenuhinya restitusi oleh pelaku dapat merbantu meringankan penderitaan yang dialaminya. Maka perlu ketegasan ataupun daya paksa terhadap pelaku/terdakwa agar membayar restitusi yang di bebankan terhadapnya, dan perlu memahami langkah apa yang bisa dilakukan apabila restitusi tidak dibayarkan. Peran Para Aparat Penegak Hukum dan Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK) Sangat dibutuhkan dalam terpenuhinya Restitusi kepada anak korban kekerasan seksual. Maka demikian selain di Perlukannya Undang-Undang guna mendorong pelaku dalam melakukan pembayaran Restitusi perlu juga di tingkatkan kualitas Pelayanan Aparat Penegak Hukum dan LPSK dalam berkomitmen untuk memenuhi hak-hak yang seharusnya didapatkan anak korban kekerasan seksual, Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akibat hukum apabila pelaku tidak membayar restitusi dapat diganti kurungan dan perampasan aset yang dimana tertuang dalam Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. penerapan hukuman pengganti atau subsider terhadap pelaku yang tidak memenuhi restitusi masih lemah. Dan masih lemahnya perampasan aset untuk diterapkan kepada pelaku yang tidak memenuhi restitusi yang dibebankan kepadanya. Dan langkah LPSK dalam membantu korban ketika pelaku melampaui batas waktu dalam pemenuhan restitusinya yaitu dengan memberitahukan kepada Jaksa Agung/Jaksa/Oditur, Dan Setelah adanya peringatan dari Pengadilan namun tidak dibayarkan oleh pelaku kemudian LPSK dapat berkoordinasi dengan jaksa dalam proses penagihan Restitusi sampai dengan perampasan aset yang berdasar pada Putusan Pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap.
Co-Authors Abdullah, Zulfirman Basuki , Beatrix, Anna Diastu, Ketut Ismed, Mohamad Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto Oktafianto, Wahyu Dwi Putri, Rindu Yusticia Puspaning Te’dang, Yonika Winner