Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Grand Ace Jordan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PEWARISAN DAN ADOPSI DALAM HUKUM WARIS ADAT BATAK TOBA Citra Elfa Handayani; Rizka Naina Fatikhasari; Nazwa Mubyn Fadillah; Grand Ace Jordan; Adzka Azzamy Fathan
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 1 No. 7 (2023): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v1i7.985

Abstract

Jurnal ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap implementasi pewarisan adat berdasarkan prinsip patrilineal serta peran tungkot dalam sistem pewarisan suku Batak Toba. Selain itu, jurnal ini juga membahas eksistensi hukum adat dalam putusan pengadilan, memberikan gambaran komprehensif tentang pengangkatan anak angkat (adopsi) menurut hukum adat Batak Toba, dan menganalisis pembagian harta warisan bagi anak angkat laki-laki dan perempuan sesuai dengan norma hukum adat Batak Toba. Penelitian ini memberikan wawasan mendalam mengenai kompleksitas sistem hukum adat Batak Toba dan kontribusinya dalam masyarakat modern.
Kepastian Hukum Tenggang Waktu Pemanggilan dan Penetapan Sidang dalam Peradilan Perdata Muhamad Rizki Firdaus; Grand Ace Jordan; Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v3i2.1584

Abstract

The implementation of civil justice in Indonesia is fundamentally guided by the principles of simplicity, speed, and low cost. However, in practice, the regulation concerning the time limits for summons and the determination of trial schedules remains inadequate, leading to legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the legal certainty of time limits in summons and trial scheduling within civil procedural law, as well as to examine its implications for the effectiveness of case resolution. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by a descriptive-analytical design. The findings indicate that existing regulations, particularly those derived from the Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) and Rechtsreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg), only provide minimum standards for summons but do not comprehensively regulate the timeframe for determining the first hearing or intervals between subsequent hearings. As a result, there is broad discretion in judicial practice, which leads to inconsistencies among courts, repeated trial delays, increased litigation costs, and reduced access to justice. Although recent reforms through electronic court systems have improved the mechanism of summons delivery, they have not sufficiently addressed the issue of time management in trial proceedings. This study concludes that the absence of clear and comprehensive regulations on trial timeframes weakens legal certainty and hinders the realization of efficient judicial processes. Therefore, strengthening normative regulations on trial scheduling is essential to support a more effective, predictable, and equitable civil justice system.
Co-Authors Adzka Azzamy Fathan Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata Citra Elfa Handayani Muhamad Rizki Firdaus Nazwa Mubyn Fadillah Rizka Naina Fatikhasari