Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.961
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta melalui Jalur Perdata: Disharmoni Normatif dan Tantangan Pembuktian dalam Rezim Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Zhakiya Eka Mulya Fadhillah; Naswa Aulia Putri; Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 4 (2026): June: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/fw5zh866

Abstract

This study examines the settlement of copyright disputes through civil law mechanisms under Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, employing a normative juridical approach with statutory and doctrinal analysis. The research focuses on the coherence and synchronization of copyright norms with civil procedural frameworks, including the Civil Code, HIR, and RBg, in addressing disputes related to economic and moral rights. The findings reveal that Indonesia adopts a declarative system of copyright protection, granting automatic rights upon fixation, yet evidentiary challenges persist due to the absence of mandatory registration. Furthermore, the study identifies structural limitations in civil litigation, particularly in the assessment of damages, evidentiary standards, and enforcement of court decisions. Through interpretative legal methods, including grammatical, systematic, and teleological approaches, this research highlights the gap between normative expectations and practical implementation. The study concludes that strengthening institutional mechanisms, improving legal coherence, and adapting regulatory frameworks to digital contexts are essential to ensure effective dispute resolution and legal certainty in Indonesia’s copyright regime.
Problematika Pertanggungjawaban Marketplace dalam Transaksi Elektronik: Disharmoni Regulasi dan Kesenjangan Perlindungan Konsumen Digital Haromatul Mukarromah Al-Bantani; Nabila Aulia Rahma; Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 4 (2026): June: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/r20psp93

Abstract

This study examines the legal responsibility of marketplace platforms for consumer losses arising from electronic transactions within the framework of Indonesian positive law. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the analysis focuses on the coherence, adequacy, and adaptability of legal norms governing digital commerce, particularly under consumer protection, trade, and electronic transaction regimes. The findings reveal that existing regulations, including consumer protection law, electronic information and transaction law, and trade law, have not yet fully accommodated the complex, multi-party nature of marketplace ecosystems, resulting in normative gaps and fragmented liability structures. Furthermore, the current liability framework tends to emphasize fault-based principles, which are insufficient in addressing systemic risks and technological asymmetries inherent in digital platforms. This study proposes a reconstructed model of marketplace liability grounded in hybrid principles, integrating strict liability, shared responsibility, and risk-based regulatory mechanisms to ensure more effective consumer protection. The proposed model contributes to the development of a responsive and adaptive legal framework capable of addressing emerging challenges in digital transactions while strengthening legal certainty and fairness in marketplace governance.
Kedudukan Yuridis dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Tulisan dalam Perkara Wanprestasi Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata; Jordan Lenbert Pandiangan; Muhammad Fajna Iqbal
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 4 (2026): June: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/4g95wj66

Abstract

This study examines the juridical status and evidentiary strength of electronic documents as written evidence in breach of contract disputes within the Indonesian legal system through a normative legal research approach. The analysis employs statute and conceptual approaches to assess the coherence between conventional civil procedural law and contemporary electronic transaction regulations, particularly focusing on the Indonesian Civil Code, HIR/RBg, and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions along with its implementing regulations. The findings indicate that electronic documents have obtained formal legal recognition as valid evidence; however, their evidentiary weight remains contingent upon authentication, integrity, and reliability standards embedded in electronic systems. The study further identifies normative inconsistencies and interpretative disparities in judicial practice, which create legal uncertainty in evaluating electronic evidence. By applying systematic and teleological interpretation, this research proposes a harmonized legal framework grounded in the principle of functional equivalence to bridge the gap between traditional and digital evidentiary regimes. The study contributes to the development of modern evidentiary law by offering a prescriptive model that integrates legal norms and technological validation mechanisms to ensure legal certainty, fairness, and procedural efficiency
Problematika Eksepsi Dan Rekonvensi Dalam Praktek Peradilan Perdata Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata; Dzakki Risqullah Ismail; Rafael Roy Irawan
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 4 (2026): June: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/espxtp62

Abstract

This article examines the doctrinal and procedural challenges in the application of exception (eksepsi) and counterclaim (rekonvensi) within Indonesian civil justice practice, emphasizing their normative structure and judicial interpretation. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes primary legal instruments including HIR, RBg, Burgerlijk Wetboek, and Rv, supported by jurisprudence and academic doctrine. The findings indicate that ambiguities in classification, procedural requirements, and the relational nexus between principal claims and counterclaims generate inconsistent judicial outcomes and weaken legal certainty. In addition, the lack of harmonization between traditional procedural norms and contemporary developments, such as electronic court systems and procedural justice principles, contributes to inefficiency and fragmentation in dispute resolution. The study proposes a systematic normative reconstruction through interpretative integration and regulatory refinement to enhance coherence and predictability. Strengthening the clarity and alignment of these procedural mechanisms is essential to ensuring an effective, fair, and modern civil procedural system in Indonesia.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Wanprestasi Debitur Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Fidusia: Studi Putusan No. 850/PDT.G/2020/PN MDN Jhonatan ZiusApril Hutabarat; Nurul Afni Octavia; Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 4 (2026): June: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/b35nsx20

Abstract

ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP WANPRESTASI DEBITUR DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT DENGAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA (Case Study: Putusan No. 850/PDT. This study examines the juridical dimensions of debtor default in credit agreements secured by fiduciary guarantees, with specific reference to Decision Number 850/Pdt.G/2020/PN Mdn. Employing a normative legal research method grounded in statute and case approaches, the analysis focuses on the interpretation of the Indonesian Civil Code and Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, complemented by doctrinal perspectives and relevant jurisprudence. The findings reveal that debtor default manifests not only in the failure to perform contractual obligations but also in the erosion of good faith, which constitutes a fundamental principle in contract law. The study further identifies that dispute resolution mechanisms reflect a structured legal process, yet their implementation remains contingent upon judicial interpretation. Importantly, the court’s refusal to grant fiduciary seizure demonstrates a progressive shift toward balancing creditor rights with debtor protection, particularly in light of constitutional jurisprudence. The analysis underscores the necessity of harmonizing legal certainty with substantive justice through interpretative methods that integrate statutory norms and judicial reasoning. This research contributes to the development of fiduciary law by proposing a more equitable framework for resolving credit disputes in Indonesia. G/2020/PN MDN)
Co-Authors Anita Annisa Raina Putri Ardhi Dzakki Risqullah Ismail Haromatul Mukarromah Al-Bantani Jhonatan ZiusApril Hutabarat Jordan Lenbert Pandiangan Muhammad Fajna Iqbal Nabila Aulia Rahma Naswa Aulia Putri Nurul Afni Octavia Rafael Roy Irawan Zhakiya Eka Mulya Fadhillah