Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Justice Voice Begawan Abioso
Arimba, Cahya Iradi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Hans Kelsen’s Nomostatics and Nomodinamics Legal Theory Arimba, Cahya Iradi
Justice Voice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v2i2.773

Abstract

Hans Kelsen is a famous figure in the positivist school, which puts forward the concept of pure law (the pure theory of law) in the concept Hans Kelsen provides two legal theories, namely static law (nomostatics) and dynamic law (nomodinamics). The purpose of this research is to understand the two legal theories put forward by Hans Kelsen, about static and dynamic law. The method used in this research is the normative juridical method with secondary legal materials in the form of books and journals that have a relevant research focus. Nomostatics legal theory is the law as a system of norms that apply, law in its resting state while nomodynamics legal theory is the process when the law is created and applied and the law is in running condition. In using a legal theory as a basis for making a law, it is necessary to be as clear as possible about the theory in the hope that the legal theory remains relevant for the next few years so that a legal theory truly follows its purpose, namely to know legal acts and to assess these acts. A legal theory is not always perfect in terms of its relevance to the times.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN PADA BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) KOTA BANDUNG Arimba, Cahya Iradi; Mutakin, Dede
Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/rj.v5i1.260

Abstract

Consumer protection issues have become a frequent topic of discussion in society today. Many consumers feel disadvantaged by the actions of business actors, making consumer protection an important issue. Often, consumers' rights are neglected by business actors, leaving a sense of dissatisfaction among consumers. According to the law, consumers have the right to file complaints with the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK). This research uses a normative legal approach with descriptive analysis based on data collection. A qualitative research method is applied through inductive analysis to gather and explore various relevant facts. The establishment of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) aims to provide effective protection for both consumers and business actors by designing a protection system that guarantees legal certainty and transparency. In the city of Bandung, the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) has four stages of dispute resolution, starting with Registration of Complaints, Pre-Trial, Trial, and Verdict.
Tanggung Jawab Hakim Pengawas Terhadap Harta Pailit Arimba, Cahya Iradi
Begawan Abioso Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): Begawan Abioso
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/abioso.v14i2.708

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana tugas dan wewenang serta tanggung jawab hakim pengawas terhadap pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit yang dilakukan oleh kurator, selain itu juga untuk mengetahui bagaimana bentuk-bentuk pengawasan dari tanggung jawab hakim pengawas sebagai pengawas proses pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Adapun hasil penelitian ini, dapat diketahui bahwa Pasal 65 UU KPKPU merupakan ketentuan hukum yang mendasari hakim pengawas dalam melaksanakan tugasnya untuk mengawasi proses pemberesan dan pengurusan harta pailit. Hakim pengawas memimpin rapat verifikasi; menyetujui atau menolak daftar tagihan; meneruskan tagihan-tagihan; mendengar saksi-saksi dan para ahli; memberikan izin atau menolak permohonan debitur untuk bepergian, hal-hal tersebut merupakan bentuk pelaksanaan tugas dan wewenang serta tanggung jawab hakim pengawas. Dalam hal pengawasan, hakim pengawas melakukan tugas pengawasan dalam bentuk-bentuk tertentu. Bentuk pengawasan ini secara eksplisit telah diatur dalam UU KPKPU, bentuk-bentuk pengawasan tersebut adalah. 1) Melalui penetapan dari hakim pengawas. 2) Melalui persetujuan dari hakim pengawas. 3) Melalui pemberian izin dari hakim pengawas. 4) Melalui pemberian usul dari hakim pengawas. 5) Melalui pemberian perintah dari hakim pengawas.
Co-Authors Mutakin, Dede