Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Hans Kelsen’s Nomostatics and Nomodinamics Legal Theory Arimba, Cahya Iradi
Justice Voice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v2i2.773

Abstract

Hans Kelsen is a famous figure in the positivist school, which puts forward the concept of pure law (the pure theory of law) in the concept Hans Kelsen provides two legal theories, namely static law (nomostatics) and dynamic law (nomodinamics). The purpose of this research is to understand the two legal theories put forward by Hans Kelsen, about static and dynamic law. The method used in this research is the normative juridical method with secondary legal materials in the form of books and journals that have a relevant research focus. Nomostatics legal theory is the law as a system of norms that apply, law in its resting state while nomodynamics legal theory is the process when the law is created and applied and the law is in running condition. In using a legal theory as a basis for making a law, it is necessary to be as clear as possible about the theory in the hope that the legal theory remains relevant for the next few years so that a legal theory truly follows its purpose, namely to know legal acts and to assess these acts. A legal theory is not always perfect in terms of its relevance to the times.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN PADA BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) KOTA BANDUNG Arimba, Cahya Iradi; Mutakin, Dede
Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/rj.v5i1.260

Abstract

Consumer protection issues have become a frequent topic of discussion in society today. Many consumers feel disadvantaged by the actions of business actors, making consumer protection an important issue. Often, consumers' rights are neglected by business actors, leaving a sense of dissatisfaction among consumers. According to the law, consumers have the right to file complaints with the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK). This research uses a normative legal approach with descriptive analysis based on data collection. A qualitative research method is applied through inductive analysis to gather and explore various relevant facts. The establishment of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) aims to provide effective protection for both consumers and business actors by designing a protection system that guarantees legal certainty and transparency. In the city of Bandung, the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) has four stages of dispute resolution, starting with Registration of Complaints, Pre-Trial, Trial, and Verdict.
Tanggung Jawab Hakim Pengawas Terhadap Harta Pailit Arimba, Cahya Iradi
Begawan Abioso Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): Begawan Abioso
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37893/abioso.v14i2.708

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana tugas dan wewenang serta tanggung jawab hakim pengawas terhadap pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit yang dilakukan oleh kurator, selain itu juga untuk mengetahui bagaimana bentuk-bentuk pengawasan dari tanggung jawab hakim pengawas sebagai pengawas proses pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Adapun hasil penelitian ini, dapat diketahui bahwa Pasal 65 UU KPKPU merupakan ketentuan hukum yang mendasari hakim pengawas dalam melaksanakan tugasnya untuk mengawasi proses pemberesan dan pengurusan harta pailit. Hakim pengawas memimpin rapat verifikasi; menyetujui atau menolak daftar tagihan; meneruskan tagihan-tagihan; mendengar saksi-saksi dan para ahli; memberikan izin atau menolak permohonan debitur untuk bepergian, hal-hal tersebut merupakan bentuk pelaksanaan tugas dan wewenang serta tanggung jawab hakim pengawas. Dalam hal pengawasan, hakim pengawas melakukan tugas pengawasan dalam bentuk-bentuk tertentu. Bentuk pengawasan ini secara eksplisit telah diatur dalam UU KPKPU, bentuk-bentuk pengawasan tersebut adalah. 1) Melalui penetapan dari hakim pengawas. 2) Melalui persetujuan dari hakim pengawas. 3) Melalui pemberian izin dari hakim pengawas. 4) Melalui pemberian usul dari hakim pengawas. 5) Melalui pemberian perintah dari hakim pengawas.
Repositioning of Religious Courts in Resolving Bankruptcy Disputes in Islamic Banking Arimba, Cahya Iradi; Suganda, Rangga
Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology Vol 6, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : SAINTIS Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33122/ejeset.v6i1.541

Abstract

The repositioning of the Religious Court in handling Islamic banking bankruptcy cases in Indonesia is still a topic of discussion in the community. This is inseparable from the fact that there is still a difference between regulation and reality. Given that so far the resolution of Islamic banking bankruptcy disputes is still the field of authority of the Commercial Court, which should and should have been resolved under the authority of the Religious Court. Many broad and complex dimensions become the benchmark for why bankruptcy in Islamic banking should be resolved under the Religious Court, there are at least three aspects that can be studied, namely, covering philosophical, sociological, and juridical aspects. This research aims to analyse the philosophical, sociological and juridical bases of the repositioning and its implications for legal protection for debtors and creditors in Islamic banking insolvency cases. Philosophically, this repositioning seeks to uphold the principle of justice contained in Islamic law, where the principle of al-adl (justice) is the basis for resolving economic cases, including in the context of Islamic banking. From a sociological perspective, this repositioning is a response to public demand for a legal system that better reflects sharia values. Juridically, this repositioning is based on existing regulations, namely Law No. 3 of 2006 on Religious Courts and Law No. 21 of 2008 on Islamic Banking and Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No.14 of 2016 on Procedures for Settling Sharia Economic Disputes, which gives the Religious Courts the authority to handle sharia economic cases. The implications of this repositioning include better legal protection for debtors and creditors, increased accountability and transparency in settlements, and increased legal certainty in the Islamic banking sector. This repositioning is expected to strengthen the integration between sharia law and state law, create a fairer, more transparent, and equitable justice system for all parties involved, and increase public confidence in the Islamic banking system in Indonesia.