Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Upaya Penanganan Hama Kutu Putih (Phenacoccus manihoti) Pada Tanaman Alpukat di Perkebunan Pekon Lombok Selatan Wardani, C Amelia; Murthado, Ahmad; Hamida; Fachri, Irfan; Sari, Linda Ratna; Sari, Ni Luh Nita; Anderson, Rhenaldy Al Akbar; Widyastuti, RA Diana
Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Inovatif Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Inovatif
Publisher : Research and Social Study Institute (RESSI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70110/jppmi.v2i3.15

Abstract

Alpukat (Persea americana) adalah buah yang sangat digemari oleh masyarakat di Indonesia dan menjadi komoditas utama di Pekon Lombok Selatan, Kecamatan Lumbok Seminung, Kabupaten Lampung Barat. Namun beberapa tahun kebelakang hama kutu putih (Phenacoccus manihoti) mengganggu aktivitas perkebunan warga khususnya pada tanaman alpukat. Tujuan dari kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah menangani hama kutu putih menggunakan pestisida alami. Untuk menunjang keberhasilan program kerja ini, maka kami mengadakan dua kegiatan utama yaitu, penyuluhan mengenai penanggulangan hama, lalu demonstrasi pembuatan serta penggunaan pestisida alami dan pupuk organik. Kegiatan ini diselenggarakan pada tanggal 1 Februari 2023 di Balai Kecamatan Lumbok Seminung, Lampung Barat dengan mengundang Klinik Pertanian Universitas Lampung yang dihadiri oleh masyarakat Lombok Selatan. Tahapan dari kegiatan pengabdian ini yaitu meliputi: identifikasi masalah, penyuluhan mengenai pengendalian hama, demostrasi pembuatan pestisida alami serta pupuk organik, dan yang terakhir adalah evaluasi kegiatan. Setelah mengikuti kegiatan penyuluhan dan demontrasi ini masyarakat jadi lebih memahami bagaimana cara membuat pestisida alami untuk mengatasi hama kutu putih. Hal ini dapat di lihat dari sebgaian masyarakat yang telah mengaplikasikan pestidida alami dalam mengatasi hama., serta mulai menggunakan pupuk organik sebagai pengganti pupuk non-organik.
LEGAL EFFORTS FOR REVIEW BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION OF THE VERDICT DEATH CRIME BECOMES LIFETIME Fachri, Irfan
Inspiring Law Journal Vol 1, No 1: Juli - Desember
Publisher : Inspiring Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A cassation decision is a decision that has permanent legal force, therefore if they are still dissatisfied with the cassation decision, the parties can submit legal action for judicial review to the Supreme Court through the district court clerk. A request for review is submitted not only for dissatisfaction with the cassation decision, but also for all court decisions that have obtained permanent legal force, in the sense that district court decisions that are not appealed can be submitted for review, and high court decisions that are not appealed can be requested for review. return. However, legal action for judicial review can only be submitted once. Therefore, if you still want to take legal action, this is closed. When applying for a review, the applicant for review must have new evidence that has never been presented before, and if it was presented at a previous hearing, the decision would be different, or have evidence that the judge made a mistake in applying the law. This type of research uses a normative juridical approach and uses qualitative analysis techniques which are then explained and analyzed using descriptive analytical methods. The type of approach used in writing this thesis is a library research approach, namely by studying books and documents related to the topic of the article and also using a statutory regulatory approach, namely by reviewing existing statutory regulations. related to the topic discussed in this research. A request for reconsideration does not suspend or stop the implementation of a court decision. As long as there is no decision, the request for reconsideration, which can only be submitted once, can be withdrawn. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia decided the request for judicial review at the first and final levels. This confirms that the application for review is only submitted once, and there is a term known as 'no review above review'. This ambiguity in the judicial review occurs due to the provisions in the Prosecutor's Law which state that the Prosecutor also has the right to submit a PK, in order to overcome the public's sense of justice towards the law. Meanwhile, according to the Judicial Power Law itself, prosecutors do not have the right to carry out PK. The right to submit a PK only rests with the Defendant, his Family and/or Heirs. Related to this research, the proposed PK is related to the change of the death penalty to life imprisonment by the judge as a result of the trial process at the Supreme Court