Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PANDANGAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS POLITIK UANG DALAM PEMILU TAHUN 2024: Criminal Law Views on Money Politics Cases in the 2024 Election Pratama, Adrian; Arif Fadhlurrahman; Angga Arniya Putra; Tegar Gala Samudra; Willy Syain Islami; Yon Efri
PUAN INDONESIA Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Puan Indonesia Vol 5 No 1 Juli 2023
Publisher : ASOSIASI IDEBAHASA KEPRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37296/jpi.v5i1.227

Abstract

Political corruption is a prominent phenomenon in modern politics, influencing political processes in various countries, including Indonesia. This article delves into the evolution of politics in Indonesia post-reform, with a focus on the role of political parties and the practice of money politics in elections. The main discussion explores the phenomenon of money politics, highlighting its correlation with political corruption and the role of political parties in society. Additionally, the article examines factors influencing the practice of money politics, such as the lack of closeness between political parties and the public, individual education levels, and low welfare standards. This analysis provides deep insights into the dynamics of money politics.By summarizing findings and implications from the analysis, this article suggests that money politics poses a serious challenge to the integrity of democracy and political justice. Therefore, efforts to prevent money politics should be a priority in strengthening a cleaner, fairer, and more transparent political system. Thus, this article makes a significant contribution to understanding money politics and efforts to address it for the sake of a healthy and sustainable democracy.
Eksistensi Lembaga Mahkamah Agung Sebagai Pelaksana Peradilan Yang Independen Dalam Rekrutmen Hakim Arman, Zuhdi; Raju Moh Hazmi; Yon Efri; Sari
Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/jf.v11i2.89

Abstract

The main issue discussed in this study is the extent to which the Supreme Court's power is autonomous in recruiting judges with the status of public officials for judicial organizations under its jurisdiction. Since legislation is the main source of information, this study takes a normative legal approach. The results of the study indicate that the current legal framework is not yet fully capable of regulating, implementing and ensuring the judicial system accurately, as well as the nature and status of judges as public officials. The current system and structure of the recruitment of judges continues to show a lack of transparency and uncertainty regarding the legal rules governing the recruitment of judges with the status of public officials. Existing norms maintain weak legitimacy, as they are not regulated by the Constitution, which establishes an independent judiciary responsible for upholding law and justice. Therefore, in the future it is necessary to adopt new rules and regulations governing the system and procedure for recruiting judges in accordance with the specificity of the position of judges as public officials to ensure the performance and accountability of judicial duties.