Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review INTELEKTUAL: JURNAL ILMIAH MULTIDISIPLIN MAHASISWA DAN AKADEMISI
Batara, Surya Daniel
Unknown Affiliation
Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Urgensi Check and Balance oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Judicial Activism dalam Praktik Demokrasi di Indonesia Abdur Rozaq, Muhammad; Batara, Surya Daniel; Ramdan Jaya, Muhamad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1780

Abstract

The mechanism of checks and balances in a democratic system is intended to avoid the use of hegenomic, tyrannical, and centralization of power, as well as provide performance monitoring activities between state institutions. However, the mechanism of checks and balances by the Constitutional Court related to the doctrine of Judicial Activism is faced with the issue of the independence of the Constitutional Court. This study aims to identify and analyze the mechanism of Checksand Balances by the Constitutional Court by applying Judicial Activism in democratic practices in Indonesia. The research is a doctrinal research and applies the statues approach and deductive analysis methods. The results of the study showed that to ensure the fair exercise of each individual as the fundamental basis of democratic values, the law and politics as an inseparable unit so that the court can use its political power to create a new norm provided for a noble purpose based on the doctrine of judicial activism by developing constitutional texts to create a social change so that the fundamental values in the Constitution can be applied progressively according to progressive legal theory. Judicial Activism is related to the judicial power that serves to check and balance. However, the freedom of judges in Indonesia is limited by the Grundnorm of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, legislation, public order and morality, government/political system, economic system, culture.
Urgensi Check and Balance oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Judicial Activism dalam Praktik Demokrasi di Indonesia Abdur Rozaq, Muhammad; Batara, Surya Daniel; Ramdan Jaya, Muhamad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1780

Abstract

The mechanism of checks and balances in a democratic system is intended to avoid the use of hegenomic, tyrannical, and centralization of power, as well as provide performance monitoring activities between state institutions. However, the mechanism of checks and balances by the Constitutional Court related to the doctrine of Judicial Activism is faced with the issue of the independence of the Constitutional Court. This study aims to identify and analyze the mechanism of Checksand Balances by the Constitutional Court by applying Judicial Activism in democratic practices in Indonesia. The research is a doctrinal research and applies the statues approach and deductive analysis methods. The results of the study showed that to ensure the fair exercise of each individual as the fundamental basis of democratic values, the law and politics as an inseparable unit so that the court can use its political power to create a new norm provided for a noble purpose based on the doctrine of judicial activism by developing constitutional texts to create a social change so that the fundamental values in the Constitution can be applied progressively according to progressive legal theory. Judicial Activism is related to the judicial power that serves to check and balance. However, the freedom of judges in Indonesia is limited by the Grundnorm of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, legislation, public order and morality, government/political system, economic system, culture.
Perlindungan Hukum Para Pihak dalam Penyusunan dan Analisis Klausul Kontrak di Indonesia Silalahi, Wilma; Batara, Surya Daniel
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Mahasiswa dan Akademisi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Edisi Mei - Juni 2026
Publisher : Prodi PGSD Unsultra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64690/intelektual.v2i2.673

Abstract

Kontrak merupakan instrumen hukum yang penting dalam mengatur hubungan para pihak dalam kegiatan bisnis, yang melahirkan hak dan kewajiban untuk dilaksanakan dengan itikad baik. Namun, dalam praktiknya, penyusunan kontrak seringkali belum optimal, baik dari segi perumusan klausul, pemenuhan syarat sah, maupun penerapan asas hukum, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa. Perkembangan teknologi juga melahirkan kontrak elektronik yang menghadirkan tantangan terkait keabsahan dan perlindungan hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses penyusunan kontrak, perumusan klausul, serta perjanjian kontrak suatu perusahaan dalam perspektif hukum perdata Indonesia dengan metode normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum dapat diwujudkan melalui penyusunan kontrak yang sistematis, klausul yang jelas dan seimbang, serta berlandaskan asas hukum kontrak. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan kehati-hatian para pihak serta penguatan regulasi yang adaptif guna menjamin keadilan, kepastian, dan perlindungan hukum.
Co-Authors Abdur Rozaq, Muhammad Ramdan Jaya, Muhamad Silalahi, Wilma