Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Normatif Tentang Tanggung Jawab Direksi Terhadap Karyawan yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Memberikan Diskon Secara Sepihak Ditinjau Dari Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil dan Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang P Haetami, Vikri; Abas, Muhamad; Yuniar Rahmatiar; Lubis, Adyan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1804

Abstract

In Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning limited liability companies, the responsibilities of a director are regulated, but the directors of PT. Antam acted in bad faith in holding its employees accountable for their actions. This research uses normative juridical qualitative research methods. Based on the findings of the discussed research, it can be inferred that the implementation of Article 97, paragraph 3 of Law No. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Companies, which holds every director fully liable for company losses if proven guilty or negligent in fulfilling their duties as outlined in paragraph 2, is yet to be fully enforced. The decision of the Panel of Judges in this case does not take into account the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil for directors to be responsible for the actions of their employees. As a result, employees who are under the responsibility of the directors are jointly and severally responsible with the Company's directors. The judge's considerations at the cassation level court imposed punishment not only on the PT. Antam, but rather the employees of PT. Antam was also given sanctions jointly and severally with PT. According to the author's analysis, Antam is not in accordance with the Piercing The Corporate Veil doctrine, where responsibility should be delegated entirely to the company's directors. Basically, the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine is a doctrine that imposes full responsibility on the company or company directors for certain things.
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE JUDGE'S CONSIDERATION OF NOT ACCEPTING THE BANKRUPTCY APPLICATION AGAINST Sopian, Singgih; Abas, Muhamad; Lubis, Adyan
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1195

Abstract

Based on the problem of bankruptcy and the postponement of debt payment obligations where PT. Fuji Smbe Indonesia filed a Bankruptcy Application against PT. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera is due to her inability to pay her debts that have matured or the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), in this case what is the legal basis for the judge's consideration of not accepting the bankruptcy application against Pt. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera and the legal consequences for the debtor for the delay in debt payment obligations. The purpose of writing is to find out the legal basis for the judge's consideration of not accepting the bankruptcy application and the legal consequences for the debtor for the delay in debt payment obligations. This research uses a normative legal approach method or library legal research which is carried out by researching literature materials. Data sources consist of secondary data including primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The conclusion is that PT. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera has met the bankruptcy requirements, namely having more than one creditor and the existence of duet and collectible debts that have been regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.