Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Tinjauan Normatif Tentang Tanggung Jawab Direksi Terhadap Karyawan yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Memberikan Diskon Secara Sepihak Ditinjau Dari Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil dan Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang P Haetami, Vikri; Abas, Muhamad; Yuniar Rahmatiar; Lubis, Adyan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1804

In Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning limited liability companies, the responsibilities of a director are regulated, but the directors of PT. Antam acted in bad faith in holding its employees accountable for their actions. This research uses normative juridical qualitative research methods. Based on the findings of the discussed research, it can be inferred that the implementation of Article 97, paragraph 3 of Law No. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Companies, which holds every director fully liable for company losses if proven guilty or negligent in fulfilling their duties as outlined in paragraph 2, is yet to be fully enforced. The decision of the Panel of Judges in this case does not take into account the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil for directors to be responsible for the actions of their employees. As a result, employees who are under the responsibility of the directors are jointly and severally responsible with the Company's directors. The judge's considerations at the cassation level court imposed punishment not only on the PT. Antam, but rather the employees of PT. Antam was also given sanctions jointly and severally with PT. According to the author's analysis, Antam is not in accordance with the Piercing The Corporate Veil doctrine, where responsibility should be delegated entirely to the company's directors. Basically, the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine is a doctrine that imposes full responsibility on the company or company directors for certain things.

JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE JUDGE'S CONSIDERATION OF NOT ACCEPTING THE BANKRUPTCY APPLICATION AGAINST Sopian, Singgih; Abas, Muhamad; Lubis, Adyan
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1195

Based on the problem of bankruptcy and the postponement of debt payment obligations where PT. Fuji Smbe Indonesia filed a Bankruptcy Application against PT. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera is due to her inability to pay her debts that have matured or the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), in this case what is the legal basis for the judge's consideration of not accepting the bankruptcy application against Pt. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera and the legal consequences for the debtor for the delay in debt payment obligations. The purpose of writing is to find out the legal basis for the judge's consideration of not accepting the bankruptcy application and the legal consequences for the debtor for the delay in debt payment obligations. This research uses a normative legal approach method or library legal research which is carried out by researching literature materials. Data sources consist of secondary data including primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The conclusion is that PT. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera has met the bankruptcy requirements, namely having more than one creditor and the existence of duet and collectible debts that have been regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.

Tinjauan Tentang Proses Peran Lembaga Bantuan Hukum dalam Penanganan Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Karawang Berdasarkan UU No 16 Tahun 2011 Tentang Bantuan Hukum Lubis, Adyan; Abas, Muhamad; Sitorus, Leonardo; Aripin, Rizal; Sihotang, Alex Antonius
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (ABDIRA) Vol 5, No 4 (2025): Abdira, Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/abdira.v5i4.1154

The existence of Legal Aid Posts (POSBAKUM) is regulated by Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for Providing Legal Services for Disadvantaged People in Court. The legal counseling method is a communicative approach carried out through the systematic delivery of juridical information by sources to the audience. Another critical finding was the public's confusion when it was explained that there were three channels for providing legal aid in operation: POSBAKUM in court, OBH accredited by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, and independent legal aid institutions. Community service activities regarding the role of legal aid institutions in handling civil cases in Karawang Regency reveal a critical gap between the normative guarantees of Law Number 16 of 2011 and the reality of accessibility of justice for underprivileged communities. Based on the findings and critical reflections from this service activity, a series of comprehensive and sustainable strategic actions are needed to optimize the role of legal aid institutions in ensuring access to justice for underprivileged communities in Karawang Regency.

Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pekerja Harian Lepas dengan Perjanjian Kerja secara Lisan Berdasarkan “PP Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja” Yulianita, Donna; Abas, Muhamad; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Lubis, Adyan
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (September - Oktober 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i6.2528

Penting untuk membahas perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja harian lepas dengan mendiskusikan hak-hak mereka dan bagaimana menegakkannya setelah tugas mereka selesai. Mempelajari bagaimana pekerja PT XYZ yang mengandalkan pengalaman kerja verbal dalam interaksinya di tempat kerja menjadi tujuan utama penelitian ini. Metode yuridis normatif yang mendasarkan kerjanya pada penerapan peraturan perundang-undangan digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Karena itu, sistem biasa memperhitungkannya. Salah satu jenis pengumpulan data yakni pengumpulan data empiris, yang memanfaatkan informasi yang dikumpulkan melalui wawancara dengan orang-orang yang sudah bekerja di organisasi tersebut. Penelitian menunjukkan bahwasanya PT XYZ kurang baik dalam berkomunikasi dan menyelesaikan tugas. Cuti pribadi bagi PT XYZ Khusus di dunia usaha konstruksi, pekerja yang bekerja dalam waktu lama memerlukan perlindungan hukum yang dituangkan dalam standar yang adil dan rinci.

JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE JUDGE'S CONSIDERATION OF NOT ACCEPTING THE BANKRUPTCY APPLICATION AGAINST Sopian, Singgih; Abas, Muhamad; Lubis, Adyan
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1195

Based on the problem of bankruptcy and the postponement of debt payment obligations where PT. Fuji Smbe Indonesia filed a Bankruptcy Application against PT. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera is due to her inability to pay her debts that have matured or the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), in this case what is the legal basis for the judge's consideration of not accepting the bankruptcy application against Pt. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera and the legal consequences for the debtor for the delay in debt payment obligations. The purpose of writing is to find out the legal basis for the judge's consideration of not accepting the bankruptcy application and the legal consequences for the debtor for the delay in debt payment obligations. This research uses a normative legal approach method or library legal research which is carried out by researching literature materials. Data sources consist of secondary data including primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The conclusion is that PT. Amanda Gumulung Sejahtera has met the bankruptcy requirements, namely having more than one creditor and the existence of duet and collectible debts that have been regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.

Analisis Yuridis Pemberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Koswara, Wahyu; Guntara, Deny; Abas, Muhamad; Lubis, Adyan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1015

The reform resulted in changes to the 1945 Constitution, changing the Indonesian constitutional system, including dividing power horizontally functionally, namely the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary Institutions. All three have different powers according to their functions. This is to reinforce the system of checks and balances against the three institutions, but also not to interfere in the affairs of other institutions outside of their powers and functions. The removal of Judge Aswanto is one example of the Legislature's involvement in Judicial affairs, the article being that the removal of Judge Aswanto often annulled laws made by the legislature so that the removal was full of political interests. In this research, it examines and analyzes the dismissal of judges at the constitutional court by the People's Representative Council of the Republic of Indonesia in connection with Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Third Amendment to Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court with a normative juridical research type so that the approach taken is a statute approach, historical approach and conceptual approach. As for the author's view, the decision to remove judge Aswanto from the House of Representatives as a legislative institution shows that the judiciary has lost its value as an independent institution. That the independence of judges should start with transparent appointments and dismissals with due regard to judicial accountability. Furthermore, the judicial power or in this case as an institution of judicial power must be free from any political interests in carrying out its duties and return the concept to Law Number 7 of 2020.

Tinjauan Normatif Tentang Tanggung Jawab Direksi Terhadap Karyawan yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Memberikan Diskon Secara Sepihak Ditinjau Dari Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil dan Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang P Haetami, Vikri; Abas, Muhamad; Yuniar Rahmatiar; Lubis, Adyan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1804

In Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning limited liability companies, the responsibilities of a director are regulated, but the directors of PT. Antam acted in bad faith in holding its employees accountable for their actions. This research uses normative juridical qualitative research methods. Based on the findings of the discussed research, it can be inferred that the implementation of Article 97, paragraph 3 of Law No. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Companies, which holds every director fully liable for company losses if proven guilty or negligent in fulfilling their duties as outlined in paragraph 2, is yet to be fully enforced. The decision of the Panel of Judges in this case does not take into account the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil for directors to be responsible for the actions of their employees. As a result, employees who are under the responsibility of the directors are jointly and severally responsible with the Company's directors. The judge's considerations at the cassation level court imposed punishment not only on the PT. Antam, but rather the employees of PT. Antam was also given sanctions jointly and severally with PT. According to the author's analysis, Antam is not in accordance with the Piercing The Corporate Veil doctrine, where responsibility should be delegated entirely to the company's directors. Basically, the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine is a doctrine that imposes full responsibility on the company or company directors for certain things.

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 7 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 7 Documents
Search