Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Ayu Ramadhani, Binanda
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Pemerintah dalam Kegiatan Pengadaan Tanah Pembangunan Jalan Tol Medan-Binjai (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 86/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Mdn) Ayu Ramadhani, Binanda; Widya Kartika, Adhitya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1830

Abstract

as regulated in Article 61 of the Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 71 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest. However, in this case, the Plaintiff as the party who has the right does not use legal remedies in the provisions mentioned above, so the Plaintiff is deemed to have accepted the decision of the land procurement committee by law. So this matter cannot be said to be an unlawful act, because there has been no rejection of the Plaintiff's objection to the results of the Inventory and Identification of Land Acquisition for the Medan - Binjai Toll Road Section I Clearance Project. As explained in the explanation above, the unlawful act committed by Defendants I, II and III regarding violating the law was wrong, because the Plaintiff had not yet held a deliberation regarding his objection, where it was clear that the implementation of land acquisition for development was in the public interest, objections to the results of the inventory and identification were rejected, the Chief Executive of Land Procurement made minutes of rejection. However, in this case no objection has ever been raised by the Plaintiff.
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Pemerintah dalam Kegiatan Pengadaan Tanah Pembangunan Jalan Tol Medan-Binjai (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 86/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Mdn) Ayu Ramadhani, Binanda; Widya Kartika, Adhitya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1830

Abstract

as regulated in Article 61 of the Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 71 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest. However, in this case, the Plaintiff as the party who has the right does not use legal remedies in the provisions mentioned above, so the Plaintiff is deemed to have accepted the decision of the land procurement committee by law. So this matter cannot be said to be an unlawful act, because there has been no rejection of the Plaintiff's objection to the results of the Inventory and Identification of Land Acquisition for the Medan - Binjai Toll Road Section I Clearance Project. As explained in the explanation above, the unlawful act committed by Defendants I, II and III regarding violating the law was wrong, because the Plaintiff had not yet held a deliberation regarding his objection, where it was clear that the implementation of land acquisition for development was in the public interest, objections to the results of the inventory and identification were rejected, the Chief Executive of Land Procurement made minutes of rejection. However, in this case no objection has ever been raised by the Plaintiff.
Co-Authors Widya Kartika, Adhitya