Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Anak yang Menjadi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Melalui Diversi Ririn Kurniasi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2056

Abstract

The growth and development of children are influenced by many factors that lead children to become perpetrators of criminal acts and ultimately engage in criminal activities. In the process of resolving such cases as a form of deterrence, it is essential to remember to safeguard their mental well-being. According to Law No. 11 of 2012 on the juvenile justice system, the handling of such cases must apply restorative justice, which provides protection and upholds the inherent rights of the child. In this study, the author will discuss the implementation of restorative justice for children that involved in criminal activities through diversion and how to achieve the goals of diversion as outlined in Law No. 11/2012. The method used in this research is normative legal research. The study employs a legislative approach, with a specific examination of Law No. 11 of 2012 and other relevant legal regulations, supported by data that underpins the research. Data collection and analysis techniques involve primary data (journals and relevant research findings) and, secondary data (books and other references). Diversions manifest restorative justice in protecting children facing legal issues, allowing juvenile justice proceedings to occur outside the formal criminal justice process, as is typical for adults. Efforts to resolve juvenile criminal acts through diversion are carried out to the fullest extent possible. Article 13 of the Child Criminal Justice System Law (SPPA) emphasizes that if no agreement is reached in the diversion process between the victim and the criminal offender, or if the agreed-upon terms are not followed, the case will proceed to the juvenile justice process, following the formalities outlined in KUHAP. Diversions are not allowed for children who engage in repeated criminal acts. Therefore, further improvement in the guidance of child offenders under the subsequent legal regulations is necessary.
Upaya Pencegahan Stunting pada Masyarakat Desa Pelantaran Kecamatan Cempaga Hulu Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Ni Made Ratini; Ririn Kurniasi; Gelar Sumbogo Peni; Armadiansyah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3278

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penyebab stunting dan upaya pencegahannya di Desa Pelantaran, Kecamatan Cempaga Hulu, Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur. Stunting merupakan masalah kesehatan serius yang memengaruhi pertumbuhan fisik dan perkembangan kognitif anak, yang diakibatkan oleh kekurangan gizi kronis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus di mana data diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor-faktor penyebab stunting di desa ini meliputi pola asuh yang kurang tepat, sanitasi yang buruk, serta akses terbatas terhadap makanan bergizi dan pelayanan kesehatan. Upaya pencegahan stunting yang telah dilakukan meliputi pemberian bantuan gizi melalui program pemberian telur dan susu kepada anak-anak yang berisiko, serta edukasi bagi orang tua mengenai pentingnya gizi dan pola asuh yang baik. Melalui intervensi yang terintegrasi, prevalensi stunting di desa ini menurun secara signifikan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan peningkatan akses terhadap layanan kesehatan dan program edukasi gizi yang lebih intensif untuk mengatasi masalah ini secara berkelanjutan.
Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Anak yang Menjadi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Melalui Diversi Ririn Kurniasi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2056

Abstract

The growth and development of children are influenced by many factors that lead children to become perpetrators of criminal acts and ultimately engage in criminal activities. In the process of resolving such cases as a form of deterrence, it is essential to remember to safeguard their mental well-being. According to Law No. 11 of 2012 on the juvenile justice system, the handling of such cases must apply restorative justice, which provides protection and upholds the inherent rights of the child. In this study, the author will discuss the implementation of restorative justice for children that involved in criminal activities through diversion and how to achieve the goals of diversion as outlined in Law No. 11/2012. The method used in this research is normative legal research. The study employs a legislative approach, with a specific examination of Law No. 11 of 2012 and other relevant legal regulations, supported by data that underpins the research. Data collection and analysis techniques involve primary data (journals and relevant research findings) and, secondary data (books and other references). Diversions manifest restorative justice in protecting children facing legal issues, allowing juvenile justice proceedings to occur outside the formal criminal justice process, as is typical for adults. Efforts to resolve juvenile criminal acts through diversion are carried out to the fullest extent possible. Article 13 of the Child Criminal Justice System Law (SPPA) emphasizes that if no agreement is reached in the diversion process between the victim and the criminal offender, or if the agreed-upon terms are not followed, the case will proceed to the juvenile justice process, following the formalities outlined in KUHAP. Diversions are not allowed for children who engage in repeated criminal acts. Therefore, further improvement in the guidance of child offenders under the subsequent legal regulations is necessary.
KEKOSONGAN NORMA PENGATURAN DATA PRIBADI PASCA KEMATIAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 27 TAHUN 2022 Ririn Kurniasi; Cristiana, Edelweisia; Alfred Yetno
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 21 No 1 (2026): Vyavahara Duta
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Fakultas Dharma Duta Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25078/vyavaharaduta.v21i1.6306

Abstract

This article examines the normative gap in the regulation of personal data after the death of data subjects and its implications for criminal liability under Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection in Indonesia. The issue is significant due to the rapid development of digital technologies that allow personal data to persist, be processed, and potentially misused even after the data subject has died, thereby increasing legal uncertainty. However, the existing legal framework primarily regulates living data subjects and fails to explicitly address the legal status, protection mechanisms, and representation of post-mortem personal data. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials were collected through a systematic review of primary and secondary legal sources and analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The underlying assumption of this research is that the absence of explicit regulation on post-mortem personal data weakens the enforcement of criminal liability. The findings demonstrate that this normative gap creates uncertainty in identifying victims, determining violated rights, and establishing criminal responsibility, which in turn hinders effective law enforcement and increases the risk of impunity. Comparative analysis with international practices, particularly interpretations of the General Data Protection Regulation, shows that several jurisdictions provide limited protection for post-mortem data through alternative legal mechanisms. This article emphasizes the need for explicit legal norms governing personal data after death, including regulatory options such as statutory amendment, implementing regulations, or progressive legal interpretation, as well as the recognition of heirs as representative legal subjects. These measures are essential to ensure legal certainty, justice, and effective enforcement of criminal liability in the protection of personal data.