Subari, Andi Akbar
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Subari, Andi Akbar; Razak, Askari; Badaru, Baharuddin
Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Lex Theory (JLT)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis prosedur penanganan tindak pidana terorisme dalam system peradilan pidana di Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini menggunakan data primer melalui wawancara sebanyak 3 Orang Penyidik Polri, 2 Orang Penuntut Umum, dan 3 Orang Hakim, wawancara dilakukan dari bulan agustus – September 2024. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa : (1) Dalam proses penanganan tindak pidana terorisme di Kota Makassar khususnya di Jalan Maccini Sawah tepatnya pada Masjid Mujahidin dalam putusan perkara Nomor 582/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks bahwa secara normatif proses penangannya dimulai dari Penyelidikan, Penyidikan, Penangkapan, Penggeledahan, Penahanan sampai dengan Persidangan Terdakwa; (2) Faktor utama terjadinya serangan terorisme dikota makassar khususnya di masjid Mujahidin dalam putusan perkara Nomor 582/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks bahwa motif utama melakukan tindakan terorisme adalah pengaruh motivasi kekeluargaan, hubungan sosial dan ekonomi serta pemahaman agama yang sangat ekstrem. The research objective is to analyze the procedures for handling criminal acts of terrorism in the criminal justice system in Makassar City. This research uses primary data through interviews with 3 Police Investigators, 2 Public Prosecutors, and 3 Judges, interviews conducted from August – September 2024. The data was analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The results of this research show that: (1) In handling criminal acts of terrorism in Makassar City, especially on Jalan Maccini Sawah, precisely at the Mujahidin Mosque in case decision Number 582/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks, normatively the handling process starts from an investigation, Investigation, Arrest, Search, and Detention up to the Trial of the Defendant; (2) The main factor in the occurrence of terrorist attacks in the city of Makassar, especially in the Mujahidin mosque, in case decision Number 582/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks, states that the main motive for carrying out acts of terrorism is the influence of family motivation, social and economic relationships and a very extreme understanding of religion.
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Corruption and Bribery: Sharia-Based Approaches to Anti-Corruption Law Subari, Andi Akbar; Faisal, Achmad; Suprapto
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 24 No 1 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (Inpress)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v24i1.14926

Abstract

Background: Corruption and bribery are persistent global problems that undermine governance, economic growth, and societal trust. While numerous legal frameworks have been developed to address these issues, their effectiveness is often influenced by cultural, religious, and institutional contexts. In Muslim-majority countries, Sharia-based legal principles provide a distinctive ethical and normative foundation for combating corruption. Purpose: This study aims to examine cross-cultural variations in anti-corruption laws with a specific focus on the contributions of Sharia-based frameworks to ethical governance, transparency, and accountability. Methods: Employing a comparative legal analysis, the research reviews anti-corruption legislation, international conventions, and Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) on integrity and public trust. Data are drawn from legal texts, case studies, and policy reports across multiple jurisdictions to evaluate enforcement mechanisms, preventive strategies, and public awareness campaigns. Findings: Employing a comparative legal analysis, the research reviews anti-corruption legislation, international conventions, and Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) on integrity and public trust. Data are drawn from legal texts, case studies, and policy reports across multiple jurisdictions to evaluate enforcement mechanisms, preventive strategies, and public awareness campaigns. Theoretical and Practical Implications: The study contributes to legal anthropology and Islamic jurisprudence by framing anti-corruption laws within culturally rooted governance models. Practically, it offers policymakers strategies for integrating ethical-religious norms into legal reforms to improve transparency, strengthen institutions, and foster public trust. Originality/Novelty: systematically compare Sharia-based anti-corruption models with secular approaches through a cross-cultural lens, highlighting the role of religious-ethical frameworks as complementary tools to global legal standards