Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Public Health Risk Assesment Journal Journal of Religion and Public Health
Hartomy, Eka
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Dentistry Environmental Science Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Veterinary

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kontaminasi kimia dan biologi pada air dan udara dengan ARKM: analisis risiko kesehatan masyarakat Rosdiana, Dian; Hastiaty, Ira Ayu; Hartomy, Eka; Kango, Ikram; Simbolon, Porman Tiurmaida; Pradapaningrum, Prima Gita; Indriasih, Minar; Paramasatya, Adhika
Public Health Risk Assesment Journal Vol. 1 No. 1: July (2023)
Publisher : Institute for Advanced Science, Social, and Sustainable Future

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61511/phraj.v1i1.2023.222

Abstract

Wawancara dilakukan ukepada 6 unit rumah tangga untuk mengambil air bersih. Anak, balita, remaja serta dewasa dilakukan pengukuran risiko kesehatan dengan pengukuran. Penelitian menunjukkan SO2 dengan konsentrasi 0.0004781 mg/m3 dan NO2 dengan konsentrasi 0.0000576 mg/m3 tidak berisiko pada semua kelompok umur di Kelurahan Depok. Sedangkan PM10 dengan konsentrasi maksimal 0.070 mg/m3 berisiko pada semua kelompok umur di Kelurahan Depok. Balita paling berisiko terhadap kontaminan PM10 dengan konsentrasi 0.042 mg/m3 sesuai karakteristik, pola pemajanan, dan pola aktivitas kelompok balita di Kelurahan Depok. e. coli. Kontaminasi mikrobiologi pada air minum menunjukkan EIR sebesar 0,00000636 berarti ada 7 orang dalam 1000000 orang populasi yang beresiko sakit karena infeksi E. coli melalui ingesti air minum. Sedangkan pada udara, EIR sebesar 0,00000121 berarti ada 2 orang dalam 1000000 orang populasi yang beresiko sakit karena infeksi E. coli melalui inhalasi udara di dalam rumah. Berdasarkan nilai CDI masing-masing kelompok umur, untuk RQ zat Mn, NO2, NO3, Cr6+, dan besi, seluruhnya di bawah 1 (RQ ≤  1).  Sehingga paparan zat-zat tersebut aman untuk pola konsumsi air minum masyarakat Rawa Lio. Air rawa memenuhi Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2021 kecuali parameter nitrat dan E. coli. RQ < 1 untuk NO2 dan SO2 pada semua kelompok umur menunjukkan tidak berisiko bagi kesehatan. Serta RQ > 1 pada konsentrasi PM10 maksimum di semua kelompok umur menunjukan tingkat berisiko bagi kesehatan.
Gambaran Implementasi Program Safety Observation Tour Dengan Model Countenance di PT Pelabuhan Indonesia II (Persero) Cabang Banten Tahun 2019 Hartomy, Eka; Farid, M.
Journal of Religion and Public Health Vol 6, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Health Sciences, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jrph.v6i1.37992

Abstract

Pelindo II Banten designed the safety observation tour program as an unsafe act andunsafe condition supervising program at the workplace. This program is targeted torelease monthly reports. However, this program only released monthly reports in April2018, April-May 2019, and September 2019, so the results did not fulfill the target. The objective of this study was to describe the implementation of a safety observation tour program in PT Pelabuhan Indonesia II (Persero) Banten Branch. This study wasconducted from December 2019 to June 2020 using the qualitative method and thecountenance model for program evaluation. The informant of this study was chosenusing a purposive sampling method. Triangulation techniques in this study used sourcetriangulation and method triangulation. According to the countenance model forevaluation, the results of this study were on intended antecedent, intended transaction, and intended outcomes aspects; not all aspects of the program are planned. Not all aspects of the program were realized based on observed antecedents, observed transactions, and observed outcomes. Not all aspects of the program fulfill the standards. Recommendations that can be given were to hold training for the safetyobservation tour program, complete the facilities for the program, complete the policyand procedure aspects of the program, improve the program implementation, improvethe follow-up aspects of the safety observation tour program, and improve the monthlyreport aspects of the program.Keywords: Countenance model, OHS hazard reporting, Safety observation tour
Gambaran Implementasi Program Safety Observation Tour Dengan Model Countenance di PT Pelabuhan Indonesia II (Persero) Cabang Banten Tahun 2019 Hartomy, Eka; Farid, M.
Journal of Religion and Public Health Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Journal of Religion and Public Health

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jrph.v6i1.37992

Abstract

Pelindo II Banten designed the safety observation tour program as an unsafe act andunsafe condition supervising program at the workplace. This program is targeted torelease monthly reports. However, this program only released monthly reports in April2018, April-May 2019, and September 2019, so the results did not fulfill the target. The objective of this study was to describe the implementation of a safety observation tour program in PT Pelabuhan Indonesia II (Persero) Banten Branch. This study wasconducted from December 2019 to June 2020 using the qualitative method and thecountenance model for program evaluation. The informant of this study was chosenusing a purposive sampling method. Triangulation techniques in this study used sourcetriangulation and method triangulation. According to the countenance model forevaluation, the results of this study were on intended antecedent, intended transaction, and intended outcomes aspects; not all aspects of the program are planned. Not all aspects of the program were realized based on observed antecedents, observed transactions, and observed outcomes. Not all aspects of the program fulfill the standards. Recommendations that can be given were to hold training for the safetyobservation tour program, complete the facilities for the program, complete the policyand procedure aspects of the program, improve the program implementation, improvethe follow-up aspects of the safety observation tour program, and improve the monthlyreport aspects of the program.Keywords: Countenance model, OHS hazard reporting, Safety observation tour
Co-Authors Dian Rosdiana, Dian Hastiaty, Ira Ayu Kango, Ikram M. Farid, M. Minar Indriasih Paramasatya, Adhika Pradapaningrum, Prima Gita Simbolon, Porman Tiurmaida