Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Strategi Restrukturisasi Utang dalam Kasus Garuda Indonesia: Pendekatan PKPU Utami, Nabila Ratu; Paranna, Tri Nadia Samuel; Suryani, Nyulistiowati; Yuanitasari, Deviana
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Doktrina:Juornal of Law April 2024
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v7i1.10939

Abstract

Debt restructuring through PKPU has a significant impact on creditors and debtors. Debt restructuring can provide benefits, such as better debt repayment than bankruptcy. However, debt restructuring also has disadvantages, including large time and costs. For the success of restructuring, the debtor's good faith is very necessary. The PT Garuda Indonesia case shows that debt restructuring was successful through a series of steps, including the issuance of debt securities and sukuk, and involving various parties such as the government and investors. The advice given is that the Early Warning System for PT's finances needs to be strengthened. Garuda Indonesia so that problems can be immediately identified and handled before they escalate. Apart from that, there is a need for effective legal regulations to avoid bankruptcy in resolving debt and receivable cases. To get around this, you can apply PKPU, which stands for postponing debt payment obligations, as a rule. After the debtor's assets are liquidated, the second option is to teach creditor-debtor reconciliation in court.
PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KELUARGA DAN HARTA BENDA PERKAWINAN TERHADAP ASAS NASIONALITAS DALAM KEPEMILIKAN HARTA BERSAMA DALAM PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN Utami, Nabila Ratu
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4808

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to examine the application of the nationality principle in joint property ownership within mixed marriages in Indonesia and to analyze the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 on the legal certainty of land ownership rights for Indonesian citizens (WNI). The nationality principle, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), restricts ownership of Freehold Title (Hak Milik) and Building Use Rights (HGB) exclusively to Indonesian citizens. In mixed marriages, the absence of a prenuptial agreement results in joint property ownership, which may cause Indonesians to lose land ownership rights as the property is deemed jointly owned with a foreign spouse, as exemplified in the case of Mrs. Ike Farida. The Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 marks a significant legal milestone by allowing the creation of prenuptial agreements, including property separation agreements, even after marriage. This ruling strengthens constitutional protection and legal certainty for Indonesians to safeguard their land rights. However, its implementation still faces administrative barriers, limited public awareness, and a lack of understanding regarding the importance of marital agreements. Therefore, collaboration among the government, legal institutions, and society is essential to enhance the effectiveness of this ruling in ensuring legal certainty and protecting the rights of Indonesian citizens. Keyword: Principle of Nationality, Joint Property, Mixed Marriage, Marital Agreement Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji penerapan asas nasionalitas dalam kepemilikan harta bersama pada perkawinan campuran di Indonesia serta menganalisis implikasi yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap kepastian hukum hak kepemilikan tanah bagi Warga Negara Indonesia (WNI). Asas nasionalitas dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) membatasi kepemilikan Hak Milik (HM) dan Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB) hanya bagi WNI. Dalam perkawinan campuran, ketiadaan perjanjian kawin menyebabkan terbentuknya harta bersama, yang berpotensi membuat WNI kehilangan hak atas tanah karena dianggap dimiliki bersama dengan pasangan Warga Negara Asing (WNA), sebagaimana terjadi pada kasus Ny. Ike Farida. Putusan MK No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 menjadi tonggak penting karena memperbolehkan pembuatan perjanjian kawin, termasuk pemisahan harta, setelah perkawinan berlangsung. Putusan ini memperkuat perlindungan konstitusional bagi WNI dalam mempertahankan hak atas tanahnya. Namun, implementasinya masih terkendala oleh faktor administratif, minimnya sosialisasi, serta kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat mengenai pentingnya perjanjian kawin. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan kolaborasi pemerintah, lembaga hukum, dan masyarakat untuk meningkatkan efektivitas penerapan putusan ini guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak WNI. Kata kunci: Asas Nasionalitas, Harta Bersama, Perkawinan Campuran, Perjanjian Kawin