Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PREDATECS: Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science
Firas, Muhammad Farhan
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Classifications of Offline Shopping Trends and Patterns with Machine Learning Algorithms Muta'alimah, Muta'alimah; Zarry, Cindy Kirana; Kurniawan, Atha; Hasysya, Hauriya; Firas, Muhammad Farhan; Nadhirah, Nurin
Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science Vol. 2 No. 1: PREDATECS July 2024
Publisher : Institute of Research and Publication Indonesia (IRPI).

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57152/predatecs.v2i1.1099

Abstract

Advancements in technology have made online shopping popular among many. However, the use of offline marketing models is still considered a profitable and important way of business development. This can be seen in the 2022 Association of Retail Entrepreneurs of Indonesia (APRINDO), which states that  60% of Indonesians shop offline, and in 2023, more than 75% of continental European consumers will prefer to shop offline. This is because many benefits can be achieved through offline marketing that cannot be obtained from online marketing. Therefore, classification of patterns and trends is performed to compare the results of the algorithms under study. Furthermore, this research was conducted to help offline retailers understand consumption patterns and trends that affect purchases. The algorithms analyzed in this study are K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Naive Bayes, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). As a result, the ANN algorithm obtained the highest confusion matrix results with an Accuracy value of 96.38%, Precision of 100.00%, and Recall of 100.00%. Meanwhile, when the Naive Bayes algorithm was used, the lowest Accuracy value was 57.39%, the Precision value was 57.86%, and when the K-NN algorithm was used, the Recall value was as low as 92.00%. These results indicate that the ANN algorithm is better at classifying offline shopping image data than the K-NN and Naive Bayes algorithms
Co-Authors Hasysya, Hauriya Kurniawan, Atha Muta'alimah, Muta'alimah Nadhirah, Nurin Zarry, Cindy Kirana