Noor Fahmi Pramuji
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Turkey’s Foreign Policy Toward The Middle East: A Case of Palestine Issue Noor Fahmi Pramuji
Journal of International and Local Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): July
Publisher : Universitas Bosowa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56326/jils.v4i1.717

Abstract

This paper aims to perform a comparative analysis of Turkey and Indonesia's foreign policy on Palestine Issue. It applies neoclassical realism as one of foreign policy theory. It discusses changing dynamics and influential factors shaping Turkey and Indonesia’s Palestine policies at the unit and systemic level of analysis. It summarises that the factors of leaders' perceptions upon international systemic changing trends and pressures, state power have become influential factors. During AK Party's eras in Turkey, its domestic politics has undergone domestic transformations namely public opinion and civil society's roles that influence to the foreign policy, the emergence of civilian leader as a new actor of foreign policy, leader factors, an increase of Islamist factor, the Israel-Palestine conflict perceived as the heart of regional instability resulted in Proactive Foreign policy including in the settlement of Palestine issue. Meanwhile, after reform eras in Indonesia, anti-colonialism spirit of 1945 Constitution has been continued as the historical background of Indonesia's engagement. Besides, an increase of Islamist factor in domestic politics namely Islamist-oriented aspirations in domestic public opinion, muslim groups as a moral force, an increasingly role of Islamist parties, and new Indonesia's international orientation and identity at SBY's tenure have affected a continuity of non-recognition policy towards Israel and supporting Palestine in accordance with two-state solution. As well as Indonesia's democratised foreign policy has been conducted through various diplomatic efforts.
Analisis Diplomasi Olahraga Small Island Developing States Pada Piala Dunia FIFA 2026: Studi Kasus Tanjung Verde Noor Fahmi Pramuji; Anastazia Niatri Wattimena
Journal of International and Local Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Universitas Bosowa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56326/1nm91125

Abstract

This study investigates the public diplomacy strategy of Cape Verde, a Small Island Developing State (SIDS), in leveraging its participation in the FIFA World Cup 2026 as an instrument of sports diplomacy, nation branding enhancement, and soft power projection. Existing sports diplomacy literature has predominantly focused on developed nations or mega-event hosts, leaving an academic gap regarding how micro-states convert sporting visibility into soft power without hosting the event. Employing Stuart Murray's Sports Diplomacy framework and Joseph Nye's Soft Power concept, this qualitative exploratory case study analyzes Cape Verde's optimization of diaspora networks and nation branding. Findings indicate that Cape Verde effectively utilizes its national football team as a track-two diplomacy actor to project resilience, redefine its national identity to a global audience, and its impressive achievements act as a nation-branding catalyst that transcends its traditional diplomatic capabilities. So, sports diplomacy allows SIDS to pierce the asymmetry of the international system and transform structural vulnerabilities into cultural attractions (soft power) with geopolitical stability implications. Traditional resource constraints are mitigated through culturally driven niche diplomacy.