Saputra, Dandi Ditia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

UNIFIKASI REGULASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF MELALUI SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA Jamaludin, Ahmad; Saputra, Dandi Ditia
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v7i2.7315

Abstract

Internationally, restorative justice resonates most in and out of the criminal justice system. The justice system's slow pace has led to a backlog of cases at law enforcement agencies and prison overcrowding in Indonesia. This study seeks to understand Indonesia's restorative justice practices at all law enforcement levels. This study used normative juridical research, which included comparative, conceptual, and statutory approaches. Based on their binding force, primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are used in this research. The data was analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The results showed that Indonesia's restorative justice rules are based on the Circular Letter of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police, the Regulation of the Chief, and the Decree of the Director General of the General Justice Office of the Supreme Court, which differ in the scope of criminal offenses that can be subject to restorative justice. This could lead to inconsistencies in its application. However, the mechanism for implementing a restorative justice-based criminal justice system should be unified and partially codified in legislation, such as government regulations strengthened by several provisions in the draft Criminal Procedure Code.
Mengeksplorasi Krisis Kebijakan dan Perlindungan Bagi Anak-Anak Terhadap Sexual Grooming Di Ruang Maya Saputra, Dandi Ditia; Rifqi Noval, Sayid Mohammad; Jamaludin, Ahmad
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 20, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Juni 2023
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v20i2.1058

Abstract

Pesatnya perkembangan internet yang sejalan dengan pertumbuhan penggunannya, hingga mengakibatkan meningkatnya kerentanan terhadap anak. Para pelaku kekerasan seskual kian beradaptasi dengan kemudahan yang diberikan internet guna mengeksploitasi kerentanan anak, sehingga menghasilkan modus operandi baru yang dapat disebut sebagai sexual grooming. Maka, penelitian ini berupaya melihat seberapa besar dampak yang sedemikian rupa diakibatkan oleh sexual grooming dari ketiadaan peraturan yang memadai, serta menemukan alternatif kebijakan yang dapat mencegah kekerasan seksual dengan mengkriminalisasi sexual grooming. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang juga bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa: pertama, kerentanan anak terhadap kekerasan seksual yang dilakukan secara daring meningkat seiring dengan masifnya penggunaan internet, yang mengakibatkan para pelaku beradaptasi dengan internet untuk melakukan kekerasan seksual guna menghindari penolakan dan pengungkapan. Kedua, sampai saat ini, hukum positif Indonesia masih belum mampu mendefiniskan serta melarang sexual grooming untuk mencegah kekerasan seksual, Indonesia hanya memiliki aturan yang melarang dan meminta pertanggugjawaban pelaku atas akibat dari sexual grooming.
UNIFIKASI REGULASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF MELALUI SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA Jamaludin, Ahmad; Saputra, Dandi Ditia
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v7i2.7315

Abstract

Internationally, restorative justice resonates most in and out of the criminal justice system. The justice system's slow pace has led to a backlog of cases at law enforcement agencies and prison overcrowding in Indonesia. This study seeks to understand Indonesia's restorative justice practices at all law enforcement levels. This study used normative juridical research, which included comparative, conceptual, and statutory approaches. Based on their binding force, primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are used in this research. The data was analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The results showed that Indonesia's restorative justice rules are based on the Circular Letter of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police, the Regulation of the Chief, and the Decree of the Director General of the General Justice Office of the Supreme Court, which differ in the scope of criminal offenses that can be subject to restorative justice. This could lead to inconsistencies in its application. However, the mechanism for implementing a restorative justice-based criminal justice system should be unified and partially codified in legislation, such as government regulations strengthened by several provisions in the draft Criminal Procedure Code.
Governing the Commodification of Abuse: Platform Liability and Double-Sanction Reform for CSAM in Indonesia Jamaludin, Ahmad; Sari, Ratu Arti Wulan; Saputra, Dandi Ditia
Al-Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Issue in Progress
Publisher : Islamic Early Childhood Education Study Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Education, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/al-athfal.2025.112-08

Abstract

Purpose – This article examines how Indonesian digital law addresses Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) when abuse is circulated and monetized through platform-based infrastructures. It argues that the present regime addresses end users more directly than platform-enabled circulation and therefore misaligns liability with the digital organization of harm.Design/methods/approach – This article uses normative legal research with statute, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. It analyzes Indonesian legislation, selected court decisions, enforcement records, and publicly available platform-policy materials, with functional comparison to the European Union’s Digital Services Act and the United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act. Mosco’s political economy of communication guides the conceptual analysis.Findings – The analysis identifies a bifurcated liability structure: individual offenders are addressed primarily through criminal sanctions, while platform accountability remains concentrated in administrative compliance and nominal fines. The DY case documents a direct linkage between paid access, platform infrastructure, and payment mechanisms in CSAM circulation. The analysis further finds that nominal sanctions are poorly aligned with platform scale and that digital access revocation remains legally unstable without explicit statutory grounding and proportionality safeguards.Research implications/limitations – This article is confined to publicly accessible legal and regulatory materials and adopts a doctrinal approach without empirical validation. Consequently, it does not interrogate how enforcement capacity, platform governance mechanisms, or digital access restrictions operate in practice or shape behavioural outcomes.Practical implications – The findings underscore the need to recalibrate child-protection regulation in digital environments through more differentiated sanctioning logics, enhanced audit and oversight capacity, and clearer doctrinal thresholds for platform liability. They further call for narrowly tailored, legally reviewable digital access restrictions that balance effective harm prevention with proportionality and due process guarantees.Originality/value – This article advances the legal scholarship on digital sexual exploitation by embedding a political economy perspective that foregrounds the structural role of platform infrastructures in organising harm. It introduces a theoretically grounded double-sanction framework that aligns turnover-based corporate liability with reviewable digital access revocation for repeat offenders, thereby reconfiguring the nexus between economic accountability and behavioural deterrence.Paper type Research paper