Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SISFOTENIKA
Bahri, Muhammad Syamsul
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
MEKANISME PENGEMBALIAN ASET NEGARA HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Bahri, Muhammad Syamsul; Marwiyah, Siti; Prawesthi, Wahyu; Amiq, Bachrul
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Mei-Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i2.8916

Abstract

Corruption is a despicable act that occurs every year. Corruption is classified as a heinous act and has a major impact on state finances, causing harm to many parties. Investigation, prosecution and court hearings in corruption cases must take priority over other cases in order to resolve them as quickly as possible. The aim of this research is to understand and analyze law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia and to understand and analyze the mechanism for returning state assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption. The method used in this research is a normative research method. It is a legal research which places the law as a building system of norms. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes regulates mechanisms or procedures that can be used to return assets through criminal and civil channels. The mechanism for returning state assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption can be carried out using two mechanisms, which is criminal route as regulated in UNCAC and the civil route (civil forfeiture). The criminal route is intended to provide a deterrent effect to corruptors so that they do not repeat criminal acts of corruption. Civil forfeiture is intended to return state assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption with evidence obtained from the criminal process, namely tracing and freezing assets. The key to success lies with each country, so it cannot be determined which mechanism is the best. Elements of success in efforts to return assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption must take into account several factors, one of which is the perspective that the law enforcement approach in Indonesia still focuses on punishing perpetrators (in personam), not confiscating assets resulting from crime.
Pengoptimalan Algoritma Genetika dengan Multithreading untuk Pencarian Kalimat Sari, Kartika; Ananda, Muharam Rizqi; Bahri, Muhammad Syamsul; Wulandari, Siti Oktavia; Prayuda, Herry
SISFOTENIKA Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): SISFOTENIKA
Publisher : STMIK PONTIANAK

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30700/sisfotenika.v14i1.410

Abstract

Algoritma genetika sering digunakan untuk memecahkan masalah pencarian teks. Namun, kinerja waktu eksekusi algoritma genetika konvensional masih kurang efisien untuk pencarian teks berskala besar. Hal ini disebabkan proses evaluasi fitness yang dilakukan secara berulang pada setiap generasi. Penelitian ini berfokus pada peningkatan efisiensi waktu eksekusi algoritma genetika untuk pencarian teks dengan mengimplementasikan multithreading. Multithreading memungkinkan proses evaluasi fitness didistribusikan ke beberapa thread secara paralel. Pada penelitian ini dilakukan pengembangan sistem pencarian teks berbasis algoritma genetika dengan membandingkan kinerja waktu menggunakan Multithread dan Singlethread, implementasi multithreading digunakan untuk mendistribusikan evaluasi fitness, dan pengukuran kinerja waktu eksekusi. Pengujian sistem dilakukan dengan cara melakukan pencarian keyword dengan menggunakan 30 buah data uji dalam 3 (tiga) skenario pengujian, yaitu dengan menggunakan Single-thread, Multithreading 2 Core, dan Multithreading 4 core untuk kemudian akan dihitung dan dibandingkan waktu eksekusinya. Hasilnya menunjukkan perbedaan kinerja waktu antara algoritma genetika asli dengan singlethread dan yang dioptimalkan menggunakan Multithreading. Hasil pengujian didapatkan nilai waktu eksekusi sistem dengan Singlethread membutuhkan waktu rata-rata 21,66 detik per generasi. Sedangkan dengan menggunakan Multithread 2 core waktu eksekusi menjadi 21,24 detik, dan 4 core menjadi 11,48 detik. Implementasi multithreading meningkatkan kecepatan eksekusi hingga 50% karena proses fitness dievaluasi secara paralel. Algoritma dengan 4 core memberikan peningkatan kinerja waktu yang signifikan.
MEKANISME PENGEMBALIAN ASET NEGARA HASIL TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Bahri, Muhammad Syamsul; Marwiyah, Siti; Prawesthi, Wahyu; Amiq, Bachrul
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Mei-Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i2.8916

Abstract

Corruption is a despicable act that occurs every year. Corruption is classified as a heinous act and has a major impact on state finances, causing harm to many parties. Investigation, prosecution and court hearings in corruption cases must take priority over other cases in order to resolve them as quickly as possible. The aim of this research is to understand and analyze law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia and to understand and analyze the mechanism for returning state assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption. The method used in this research is a normative research method. It is a legal research which places the law as a building system of norms. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes regulates mechanisms or procedures that can be used to return assets through criminal and civil channels. The mechanism for returning state assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption can be carried out using two mechanisms, which is criminal route as regulated in UNCAC and the civil route (civil forfeiture). The criminal route is intended to provide a deterrent effect to corruptors so that they do not repeat criminal acts of corruption. Civil forfeiture is intended to return state assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption with evidence obtained from the criminal process, namely tracing and freezing assets. The key to success lies with each country, so it cannot be determined which mechanism is the best. Elements of success in efforts to return assets resulting from criminal acts of corruption must take into account several factors, one of which is the perspective that the law enforcement approach in Indonesia still focuses on punishing perpetrators (in personam), not confiscating assets resulting from crime.
Co-Authors Ananda, Muharam Rizqi Bachrul Amiq Kartika Sari Prayuda, Herry Siti Marwiyah Wahyu Prawesthi, Wahyu Wulandari, Siti Oktavia