Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti
Putra, Reza Adi
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
HUKUM ANGKUTAN UMUM ILEGAL BAGI PENUMPANG BILA TERJADI KECELAKAAN Putra, Reza Adi; Saputra, Arikha
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v7i2.5579

Abstract

ABSTRACTTransportation has now become a basic human need in fulfilling its mobility. The government is trying to make this happen by building mass public transportation such as bus rapid transit or BRT, city transportation and online-based transportation. However, it seems that it is still unable to meet the needs of various communities so that illegal public transportation or dark travel with private vehicles with black plates does not meet the requirements for public transportation, so that if an accident occurs it will be weak in the field of legal regulations as stipulated in Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and road transport. The author conducted research using normative juridical methods guided by applicable laws and regulations, as well as using analytical descriptive methods to find out and understand the object of study. Illegal public transportation or dark travel operates without a permit to transport passengers without life insurance protection and does not pay mandatory fees as stipulated in Law Number 33 of 1964 concerning Passenger Accident Compulsory Insurance Funds, so that if an accident occurs the legal consequences are weak because they will not receive compensation. loss, if the passenger dies or suffers permanent disability. The government is responsible for organizing public transportation in an effort to meet the need for safe, secure, comfortable and affordable transportation. So public transportation must be in the form of a company that is licensed, legal entity and is required to pay mandatory contributions for life insurance for passengers, if an accident occurs they will receive compensation. Public transportation is illegal if in the event of an accident it will not get compensation due to death and permanent disability, because it does not pay mandatory coverage. As a result, passengers only receive compensation from the vehicle owner.
HUKUM ANGKUTAN UMUM ILEGAL BAGI PENUMPANG BILA TERJADI KECELAKAAN Putra, Reza Adi; Saputra, Arikha
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v7i2.5579

Abstract

ABSTRACTTransportation has now become a basic human need in fulfilling its mobility. The government is trying to make this happen by building mass public transportation such as bus rapid transit or BRT, city transportation and online-based transportation. However, it seems that it is still unable to meet the needs of various communities so that illegal public transportation or dark travel with private vehicles with black plates does not meet the requirements for public transportation, so that if an accident occurs it will be weak in the field of legal regulations as stipulated in Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and road transport. The author conducted research using normative juridical methods guided by applicable laws and regulations, as well as using analytical descriptive methods to find out and understand the object of study. Illegal public transportation or dark travel operates without a permit to transport passengers without life insurance protection and does not pay mandatory fees as stipulated in Law Number 33 of 1964 concerning Passenger Accident Compulsory Insurance Funds, so that if an accident occurs the legal consequences are weak because they will not receive compensation. loss, if the passenger dies or suffers permanent disability. The government is responsible for organizing public transportation in an effort to meet the need for safe, secure, comfortable and affordable transportation. So public transportation must be in the form of a company that is licensed, legal entity and is required to pay mandatory contributions for life insurance for passengers, if an accident occurs they will receive compensation. Public transportation is illegal if in the event of an accident it will not get compensation due to death and permanent disability, because it does not pay mandatory coverage. As a result, passengers only receive compensation from the vehicle owner.
FAKTOR-FAKTOR MEMENGARUHI KECURANGAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DIMODERASI OLEH KEEFEKTIFAN KOMITE AUDIT DALAM PERSPEKTIF FRAUD HEXAGON Putra, Reza Adi; Herawaty, Vinola
Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): April
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas EKonomi dan Bisnis 

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/jet.v4i1.18283

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor mempengaruhi kecurangan laporan keuangan dimoderasi oleh keefektifan komite audit dalam Perspektif fraud hexagon studi kasus pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2019-2021. Jenis Penelitan ini adalah kuantitatif. Populasi penelitan ini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dalam kategori Consumer Good Industry, Retail, dan Wholesaler. Untuk mengetahui pengaruh : variabel Stimulus terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; variabel Opportunity terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; variabel Rationalization terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; variabel Capability terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; variabel Ego terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; variabel Collusion terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; Komite audit dengan Stimulus terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; Komite audit dengan Opportunity terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; Komite audit dengan Rationalization terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; Komite audit dengan Capability terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; Komite audit dengan Ego terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan; Komite audit dengan Collusion terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan.
Co-Authors Arikha Saputra Vinola Herawaty