Fathurrohman, Mohammad Faridz
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

THE CONNECTED OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 109/PK/PDT/2022 WITH THE BASIC AGRARIAN LAW NUMBER 5 OF 1960 CONCERNING EIGENDOM VERPONDING Noor, Aslan; Herlani, Lisa; Fathurrohman, Mohammad Faridz; Lorenza, Melinda; Nurwidianti, Maudy
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Mei-Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i2.8873

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the juridical nature of the Supreme Court's decision regarding Eigendom Verponding. Ownership rights are the strongest and most hereditary land to be enjoyed fully and to control the object freely, unless this can be proven to be reversed. This research used normative research with a statutory approach. The legal materials used were primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, with legal material collection techniques through literature studies and analysis techniques. The research results indicate that judge's considerations deviate from the stipulation outlined well as statutory regulations. The emergence of multiple land ownership rights leads to criminal acts caused by negligence on the part of the land owner or parties who commit fraud, such as parties who acknowledge the land but do not, so the BPN issues a certificate. This proves the importance of creating a new policy regarding land registration through additional evidence. Ownership, and shorten the land registration process so that land owners feel energized about the lengthy process. The importance of policies regarding the formulation of criminal acts regarding certificates issued because so far, many holders of land title certificates have suffered losses as a result of the cancellation of land title certificates, overlapping ownership, and disputes originating from errors in the process.
THE CONNECTED OF THE SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 109/PK/PDT/2022 WITH THE BASIC AGRARIAN LAW NUMBER 5 OF 1960 CONCERNING EIGENDOM VERPONDING Noor, Aslan; Herlani, Lisa; Fathurrohman, Mohammad Faridz; Lorenza, Melinda; Nurwidianti, Maudy
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Mei-Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i2.8873

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the juridical nature of the Supreme Court's decision regarding Eigendom Verponding. Ownership rights are the strongest and most hereditary land to be enjoyed fully and to control the object freely, unless this can be proven to be reversed. This research used normative research with a statutory approach. The legal materials used were primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, with legal material collection techniques through literature studies and analysis techniques. The research results indicate that judge's considerations deviate from the stipulation outlined well as statutory regulations. The emergence of multiple land ownership rights leads to criminal acts caused by negligence on the part of the land owner or parties who commit fraud, such as parties who acknowledge the land but do not, so the BPN issues a certificate. This proves the importance of creating a new policy regarding land registration through additional evidence. Ownership, and shorten the land registration process so that land owners feel energized about the lengthy process. The importance of policies regarding the formulation of criminal acts regarding certificates issued because so far, many holders of land title certificates have suffered losses as a result of the cancellation of land title certificates, overlapping ownership, and disputes originating from errors in the process.
Examining Land Rights Expropriation Policies for Public Interest: A Social Justice Perspective in Indonesia Noor, Aslan; Alamsyah, Dian; Fathurrohman, Mohammad Faridz
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1976

Abstract

The policy of land acquisition for public purposes is an important instrument for supporting national development. Yet in practice, it often generates agrarian conflicts and raises concerns about justice for affected communities. The central issue lies in the gap between the normative objectives of land acquisition policies and their implementation, particularly in ensuring the protection of citizens' rights and the realization of social justice. This study addresses the following research question: How is the implementation of land acquisition policies for public interest evaluated from a social justice perspective? Using a normative legal research method, this study analyses relevant legislation, court decisions, and recent academic literature through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that land acquisition practices remain dominated by administrative and legal-formal orientations, which limit the achievement of substantive justice. Community participation is often procedural rather than meaningful, compensation mechanisms largely emphasize economic valuation, and restorative measures to support post-displacement recovery are insufficiently integrated. The study concludes that land acquisition policies must be reoriented toward a more participatory, equitable, and restorative framework to strengthen policy legitimacy and better safeguard community rights throughout the development process.