Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Memelihara Stabilitas dan Keadilan melalui Keseimbangan Kekuasaan dalam Kerangka Hukum Tata Negara Ade Cahya Dwi Ernawan; Alfiyan Rahmat Dani Utomo; Regina Agneshia Hannaningdyah; Nataneila Astya Putri Asmana
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juni
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v1i3.1686

Abstract

Abstrak. Efforts to maintain stability and justice in a country are extremely fundamental and strategic. In the history of Indonesia, there have been several changes in the system of government, such as the transition from a presidential system to a parliamentary system, as well as changes in the organizational structure of government. From this, the changes that occur can affect or potentially disrupt the balance of power and affect stability and justice in the country. This also needs to be anticipated and examined using the framework of the state law so that the questions that arise later can be answered by law focused on the concept of the state.The balance of power within the framework of the constitution is very important for maintaining stability and justice in the government system. The balance of power allows for the monitoring and control of the use of state power, thereby preventing the abuse of power by any one party. Keywords : Justice, Balance, Constitutional Law Abstrak. Upaya memelihara stabilitas dan Keadilan dalam suatu negara merupakan hal yang sangat fundamental dan strategis. Dalam perjalanan sejarah Indonesia, telah mengalami beberapa perubahan dalam sistem pemerintahan, seperti berubahnya sistem presidensial ke sistem parlementer, serta perubahan struktur organisasi pemerintahan. Dari hal ini, perubahan perubahan yang terjadi dapat mempengaruhi atau berpotensi mengganggu keseimbangan kekuasaan dan mempengaruhi stabilitas dan keadilan dalam negara. Hal ini juga perlu kita siasati dan perlu kita telisik menggunakan kerangka hukum negara agar pertanyaan pertanyaan yang timbul nantinya dapat terjawab oleh hukum yang terfokuskan kepada konsepsi negara. perimbangan kekuasaan dalam kerangka konstitusi sangat penting untuk menjaga stabilitas dan keadilan dalam sistem pemerintahan. Keseimbangan kekuasaan memungkinkan adanya pengawasan dan pengendalian penggunaan kekuasaan negara, sehingga mencegah penyalahgunaan kekuasaan oleh salah satu pihak. Kata Kunci : Keadilan, Keseimbangan, Hukum tata negara
Peran Non-Governmental Intermediary dalam Menjembatani Petani dan Pemerintah: Model Kelembagaan Baru untuk Akselerasi Reforma Agraria Muhamad Febri Pribadi; Regina Agneshia Hannaningdyah; Muhammad Anas Ulil Abshor Munif; Nataneila Astya Putri Asmana; Aprila Niravita; Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikri
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v2i4.1398

Abstract

This research analyzes the strategic role of the Non-Governmental Intermediary (NGI) in bridging farmers and the government to accelerate the implementation of Agrarian Reform (RA) in Indonesia. Sharp agrarian inequality, driven by colonial legacy, land control by corporations/elites, and slow RA due to bureaucratic complexity, overlapping authorities, and information gaps, creates an urgent need for new collaboration mechanisms. NGIs fill this void by performing a multidimensional role: Dialogue Facilitator to reduce information asymmetry; Technical Assistant through Participatory Mapping and valid administrative document preparation; Community-Based Agrarian Conflict Mediator; Independent Monitor for accountability; and Policy Advocate. A New Institutional Model based on Hybrid Governance is proposed, formally integrating the state, NGIs, and farming communities, supported by Technological Integration for transparent participatory spatial data. This model must be realized through Institutionalized Partnership (MoU/Presidential Regulation) to ensure legitimacy and sustainability. Key challenges include bureaucratic resistance, NGO stigma, and local elite conflicts of interest, but strengthening the NGI role presents opportunities through enhanced public accountability and technical innovation. In conclusion, the successful acceleration of RA hinges on the formal legal recognition and capacity building of NGIs as official actors within the RA institutional framework.
Pentingnya Bukti dalam Kasus Utang Piutang Ananda Putri Agustina Hikmawati; Jingga Ajeng Muda Jamaica; Lillah Ariani; Nataneila Astya Putri Asmana; Sahihah Anik Awalia; Heru Saputra
Mahalini: Journal of Business Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Mahalini: Journal of Business Law
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/mjbl.v1i1.11071

Abstract

The examination of evidence is a major factor in confirming the validity of receivables claims, ensuring compliance with legal procedures, and crafting strong arguments in court. The research on Evidence Review in Enforcement of Unpaid Receivables has several objectives, namely Investigating how evidence affects the enforcement of receivables law, identifying evidence that plays an important role, and exploring the importance of evidence examination in ensuring the success of receivables-related legal proceedings. The research method involves literature analysis, case studies, as well as the application of normative methods. Data analysis was conducted by comparing and contrasting the different types of evidence used in receivables law enforcement. The results show that in the evidentiary process related to the enforcement of unpaid receivables, an in-depth understanding of the types of evidence and their use plays a crucial role in determining the success of the legal process. With an understanding of the significant varieties of evidence and their impact on enforcement outcomes, this research can optimize the efficiency of the implementation of the enforcement process against unsettled receivables.