Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Sawerigading Law Journal

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Beras Ase Lapang Pangkep Sebagai Produk Potensi Indikasi Geografis Maemanah; Heliany, Ina; M, Nurmiati
Sawerigading Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Maret 2023 - September 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sawerigading Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62084/slj.v2i2.331

Abstract

Legal protection for Pangkep Field Assets as a potential product of Geographical Indications, by knowing the role of the Pangkep government in encouraging efforts to protect Geographical Indications for Pangkep Field Assets, this research uses primary data and secondary data, then the data is analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The research results show that: 1) Pangkep field Ase has the potential to receive Geographical Indication Law protection because it has fulfilled the requirements for Geographical Indication registration such as characteristics and qualities that differentiate Pangkep field Ase from other rice, geographical environment, natural factors, human factors, area boundaries covered by the Indication Geography, history and traditions related to the use of Geographical Indications. However, to prove certainty, registration must be carried out first and must be tested by a team of Geographical Indication experts. 2) The Pangkep Regency Government has made efforts to provide Geographical Indication protection for the Pangkep field assets. However, the efforts made by the Pangkep Regency Government have not been optimal. This is due, among other things, to a lack of public awareness and understanding, especially farmers, of the importance of legal protection through Geographical Indications for Pangkep field assets.
Efektivitas Pembagian Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pilkada Di Indonesia Maemanah
Sawerigading Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Maret 2025 - September 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sawerigading Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62084/slj.v4i1.461

Abstract

the authority to adjudicate disputes concerning election results (vote count disputes), while the State Administrative Court (Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara/PTUN) has jurisdiction over procedural or administrative disputes related to State Administrative Decisions issued by election organizers. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the division of authority between the MK and PTUN in resolving regional head election (Pilkada) disputes in Indonesia, particularly after the enactment of Law Number 10 of 2016. This research employs legal research methods using a normative legal research approach, including statutory analysis and case study examination. The evaluation results indicate that the division of authority between MK and PTUN cannot yet be considered fully effective, as several critical issues remain. Overlapping authority frequently occurs, accompanied by differing interpretations between procedural disputes and result disputes, ultimately creating legal uncertainty. The current institutional design of judicial bodies handling Pilkada disputes contributes to ineffective dispute resolution and challenges the realization of electoral justice. The study recommends regulatory synchronization and reforms in administrative judicial mechanisms to ensure that PTUN decisions in Pilkada disputes are swift, final, and binding, similar to Constitutional Court decisions, thereby reducing uncertainty and jurisdictional overlap