Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan
Ramdani, Fahmi Ali
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGAL PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA OF SHOPEEPAY LATER LOAN USERS Ramdani, Fahmi Ali; Amalina, Dini
VARIA HUKUM Vol 6, No 1 (2024): VARIA HUKUM
Publisher : Ilmu Hukum, Sharia and Law Faculty, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/vh.v6i1.26742

Abstract

Shopee Pay Later, which is a credit facility, is also a type of Fintech or Financial Technology with the term Fintech lending or also called Fintech Peer-to-Peer Lending, which is a payment method with an online lending system without having a bank account. By using the empirical legal research method, the researcher found cases related to the lack of consumer protection for Shopee Pay Later application users, namely Fitri Yeni Prihandono's sister with the occurrence of her account being hacked. This act violates Article 30 Paragraph 3 jo. Article 46 Paragraph 3 of Law Number 11 the Year 2008 jo. Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. In its development, Shopee has an obligation to its consumers in terms of consumer protection according to the provisions in Article 4 jo. Article 62 of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Shopee violates the security of the network which is already in the provisions of POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning Information and Technology-Based Lending and Borrowing Services which is the basis for the regulation of the Pay Later system.Shopee Pay Later yang merupakan fasilitas kredit juga merupakan salah satu jenis Fintech atau Financial Technology dengan istilah Fintech lending atau disebut juga dengan Fintech Peer-to-Peer Lending, yang merupakan metode pembayaran dengan sistem peminjaman secara online tanpa harus memiliki rekening bank. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, peneliti menemukan kasus terkait kurangnya perlindungan konsumen terhadap pengguna aplikasi Shopee Pay Later yaitu saudari Fitri Yeni Prihandono dengan terjadinya peretasan akunnya.  Perbuatan tersebut melanggar Pasal 30 Ayat 3 jo. Pasal 46 Ayat 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Dalam perkembangannya, Shopee memiliki kewajiban terhadap konsumennya dalam hal perlindungan konsumen sesuai ketentuan dalam Pasal 4 jo. Pasal 62 Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Shopee melanggar keamanan jaringan yang sudah ada dalam ketentuan POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Teknologi yang menjadi dasar pengaturan sistem Pay Later.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA OF SHOPEEPAY LATER LOAN USERS Ramdani, Fahmi Ali; Amalina, Dini
VARIA HUKUM Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan
Publisher : Ilmu Hukum, Sharia and Law Faculty, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/vh.v6i1.26742

Abstract

Shopee Pay Later, which is a credit facility, is also a type of Fintech or Financial Technology with the term Fintech lending or also called Fintech Peer-to-Peer Lending, which is a payment method with an online lending system without having a bank account. By using the empirical legal research method, the researcher found cases related to the lack of consumer protection for Shopee Pay Later application users, namely Fitri Yeni Prihandono's sister with the occurrence of her account being hacked. This act violates Article 30 Paragraph 3 jo. Article 46 Paragraph 3 of Law Number 11 the Year 2008 jo. Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. In its development, Shopee has an obligation to its consumers in terms of consumer protection according to the provisions in Article 4 jo. Article 62 of Law no. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Shopee violates the security of the network which is already in the provisions of POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning Information and Technology-Based Lending and Borrowing Services which is the basis for the regulation of the Pay Later system.Shopee Pay Later yang merupakan fasilitas kredit juga merupakan salah satu jenis Fintech atau Financial Technology dengan istilah Fintech lending atau disebut juga dengan Fintech Peer-to-Peer Lending, yang merupakan metode pembayaran dengan sistem peminjaman secara online tanpa harus memiliki rekening bank. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, peneliti menemukan kasus terkait kurangnya perlindungan konsumen terhadap pengguna aplikasi Shopee Pay Later yaitu saudari Fitri Yeni Prihandono dengan terjadinya peretasan akunnya.  Perbuatan tersebut melanggar Pasal 30 Ayat 3 jo. Pasal 46 Ayat 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Dalam perkembangannya, Shopee memiliki kewajiban terhadap konsumennya dalam hal perlindungan konsumen sesuai ketentuan dalam Pasal 4 jo. Pasal 62 Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Shopee melanggar keamanan jaringan yang sudah ada dalam ketentuan POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Teknologi yang menjadi dasar pengaturan sistem Pay Later.
POLITIK HUKUM PEMBENTUKAN DAERAH OTONOM: ANTARA ASPIRASI LOKAL DAN KEPENTINGAN ELIT POLITIK Wiguna, Teguh Setia; Aprilianti, Ajeng; Dewi, Anisya Auriana; Ramdani, Fahmi Ali
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 13 No 2 (2025): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (IN PROGRESS)
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v13i2.1609

Abstract

The policy of establishing new autonomous regions (DOB) in Indonesia is normatively aimed at improving public services and enhancing community welfare. However, in practice, the process is often controlled by the political interests of elites at both the central and regional levels, who exploit the issue of regional expansion as a tool for negotiating power, positions, and resources. Although the expansion is often claimed to be a response to local aspirations, many of these initiatives do not show significant impacts on community welfare and instead give rise to various problems, such as conflicts of interest, manipulation of the political process, and horizontal tensions within the community. The effectiveness of regional expansion is highly determined by the cohesion and understanding among local political elites; when fragmentation occurs among them, the expansion process tends to experience stagnation or even prolonged conflicts. Therefore, a critical study of the legal politics of DOB expansion becomes important to ensure that the policy does not merely serve the interests of a handful of elites, but truly reflects the aspirations and needs of the broader community.
Co-Authors Amalina, Dini Aprilianti, Ajeng Dewi, Anisya Auriana Wiguna, Teguh Setia