Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Implications of Changes in the State Budget (APBN) through Presidential Instruction (Inpres) from the Perspective of Administrative Law Kusuma, Lalu Aria Nata; Syarif, Nawaz
Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan Vol 9 No 2 (2025): In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Dr. Soetomo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25139/lex journal.v9i2.10047

Abstract

In realizing the prosperity and well-being of the people, the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget/State Budget (APBN) plays a crucial role in reflecting the government's economic policy. According to the provisions in the State Financial Law, changes to the APBN during the fiscal year can only be made through the instrument of the Revised APBN Law. However, Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 2025, which was issued, alters the established APBN. This change raises questions about whether the presidential instruction, as a discretionary power, can be used to modify the APBN and what the implications are. The research method used is normative legal research utilizing a legislative and conceptual approach. The research results indicate that presidential instructions are regulations used to interpret vague and stagnant rules to address existing issues. However, this does not mean that presidential instructions can be used freely. In the context of changing the posture of the APBN through presidential instructions, this research shows that such actions do not meet the objectives and requirements for issuing discretion as stipulated in the Government Administration Law. The failure to meet these conditions has implications, namely: 1) the presence of Presidential Instruction No. 1/2025 is a form of abuse of power by state administrative officials; 2) the normalization of abusive discretionary practices by the government; and 3) it shows the failure of the House of Representatives (DPR) to perform its function properly. Therefore, it is important for the government, as administrative officials who can issue discretion, to adhere to existing guidelines when issuing policy regulations.
KONSEP HUKUM HAK DAN KEWAJIBAN WARGA NEGARA PERSPEKTIF PIAGAM MADINAH Syarif, Nawaz; Habibi, Ahmad
Mitsaqan Ghalizan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Mitsaqan Ghalizan
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/mg.v4i1.7365

Abstract

In the course of history, we have seen that conflict occurs due to different needs, which is why sometimes the law appears as a way to mediate between one another. In this case, the Medina Charter, which is the state Constitution, is the legal basis regarding the rights and obligations of its people. This research is legal research which focuses on analyzing using a conceptual approach how the legal concept of the Medina Charter presents the rights and obligations of every human being as a citizen. The Medina Charter teaches us lessons about Brotherhood (Al-Ikha), Equality (Al-Musawa), Tolerance (Tasamuh), Deliberation (Al-Tasyawur), mutual help (Al-Ta'awun), Justice (Al-Aku). The points given here play a very important role in life in society, for example the brotherhood that is given will form a bond that requires other people to respect and appreciate each other's fellow human beings. Brotherhood also creates peace because they feel a bond. The equality provided in the Medina charter also brings us to the same position without having to differentiate, and this also makes tolerance happen in people's lives
Penguatan Pengaturan Kebijakan Taman Nasional Berbasis Community Based Conservation Terhadap Hutan Adat di Indonesia Syarif, Nawaz; Abdillah, Muhammad Torieq
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Vol 11, No 2 (2025): Published 31 Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jhmj.v11i2.5974

Abstract

AbstractEscalating deforestation and agrarian conflicts in and around national parks reveal the weak protection of customary forests and indigenous peoples’ rights despite constitutional recognition and Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012. This study is urgent because disharmony among sectoral regulations and a state-centric forest governance paradigm produce tenure insecurity and criminalization of indigenous communities. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, it analyzes the 1945 Constitution, Forestry Law, Conservation Law, Government Regulation No. 28/2011, Decision 35/PUU-X/2012, and literature on community-based conservation. The results show that integration of adat rights into national law remains partial and often reduced by licensing regimes, while CBC practices in Lore Lindu and Wakatobi National Parks demonstrate that tenure recognition and collaborative governance improve conservation effectiveness. The article concludes that a pluralistic, people-centered conservation policy grounded in adat law is required.AbstrakDeforestasi yang terus meningkat dan konflik agraria di kawasan taman nasional menunjukkan lemahnya perlindungan hutan adat dan hak masyarakat hukum adat meski telah ada pengakuan konstitusional dan Putusan MK 35/PUU-X/2012. Penulisan ini mendesak karena ketidakharmonisan regulasi sektoral dan paradigma pengelolaan hutan yang masih state-centric menimbulkan kerentanan tenurial dan kriminalisasi masyarakat adat. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual terhadap UUD 1945, UU Kehutanan, UU Konservasi, PP 28/2011, Putusan MK 35/PUU-X/2012, serta literatur tentang community based conservation. Hasilnya menunjukkan integrasi hak adat dalam hukum nasional masih parsial dan sering tereduksi oleh rezim perizinan, sementara praktik CBC di Taman Nasional Lore Lindu dan Wakatobi membuktikan bahwa pengakuan hak tenurial dan tata kelola kolaboratif meningkatkan efektivitas konservasi. Disimpulkan perlunya reformulasi politik hukum konservasi yang pluralistik dan people-centered berbasis hukum adat.Â