Sujatmoko, Andrey
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search
Journal : terAs Law Review: Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM

KONVENSI DEN HAAG 1907 MENGENAI ALAT DAN CARA BERPERANG Andrey Sujatmoko
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 1 No. 1 (2005): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1536.013 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/teras-lrev.v1i1.5393

Abstract

Konferensi Perdamaian dan Konvensi Den Haag 1907 Salah satu ketentuan hukum yang sangat penting dalam hukum humaniter adalah hukum yang mengatur tentang alat (means) dan cara (methods) berperang sebagaimana yang diatur di dalam Konvensi Den Haag tahun 1899 dan 1907. Konvensi terse but merupakan hasil dari Konferensi Perdamaian I (First Peace Conference) yang diselenggarakan selama dua bulan (dibuka tanggal 20 Mei 1899) dan Konferensi Perdamaian II (Second Peace Conference) yang diselenggarakan pada tanggal 15 Juni18 Oktober 1907. Kedua konferensi tersebut diadakan di Den Haag, Beland a.
PENGADILAN CAMPURAN ("HYBRID TRIBUNAL") SEBAGAI FORUM PENYELESAIAN ATAS KEJAHATAN INTERNASIONA Andrey Sujatmoko
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 3 No. 5 (2007): Jurnal Hukum Humaniter
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1953.338 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/teras-lrev.v3i5.5418

Abstract

Pada saat ini telah dikenal berbagai bentuk penyelesaian melalui forum pengadilan internasional terhadap sejumlah kejahatankejahatan yang tunduk di bawah yurisdiksi hukum internasional (crimes under international law). Kejahatan-kejahatan tersebut antara lain: kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan, genocide dan kejahatan perang. Pengadilan internasional tersebut dibentuk oleh Dewan Keamanan PBB maupun berdasarkan perjanjian internasional, misalnya: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, serta International Criminal Court. Namun, dewasa ini dikenal pula pengadilan campuran (hybrid tribunaf) yang sebenarnya merupakan pengadilan nasional yang diinternasionalisasi (internationalized domestic tribunal). Pengadilan ini merupakan perkembangan baru untuk menyelesaikan kasus-kasus yang terkait dengan kejahatan-kejahatan di atas. Artikel ini akan membahas masalah pengadilan campuran tersebut
STATE RESPONSIBILITY AND VICTIM’S REPARATIONS IN INDONESIA: THEORY OF LAW PERSPECTIVE Andrey Sujatmoko
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): terAs Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (343.452 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/teras-lrev.v1i1.5993

Abstract

Gross human rights violations are an internationally wrongful act which entails responsibility to the wrongdoer state to conduct reparations. Based on the principle of state responsibility, the said obligation appears because thr wrongdoer state has already breached an international obligation under international law. Indonesia still has the past gross human rights violations cases that were not settled yet, including the reparations issue of its victims. This article will analyse state responsibility theory, lawstate theory, and development law theory as the theory of law to explain legal obligation of state to conduct reparations toward the victims of the said violations.
HUBUNGAN TALIBAN DAN CINA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL (The Taliban and China Relations in International Law Perspective) M. Reza Syariffudin Zaki; Andrey Sujatmoko
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Mei 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (285.629 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/teras-lrev.v3i1.10745

Abstract

Sejak Taliban pimpinan Haibatullah Akhundzada menguasai Afghanistan pada pada 15 Agustus yang lalu, Cina tampaknya menjadi negara yang paling intens bekerjasama  dengan rezim yang berkuasa secara de facto itu. Berbeda dari negara-negara Barat yang cenderung mengambil jarak, tampaknya Cina mengambil sikap sebaliknya yang lebih akomodatif terhadap Taliban. Di sisi lain, pemerintahan Taliban sebagai rezim de facto yang sekarang berkuasa juga ingin menunjukkan citra baru dan berbeda dengan Taliban sebelumnya yang secara notorious berkuasa dengan brutal dalam kurun waktu 1996-2001 di bawah pimpinan Mohammad Omar. Tulisan ini akan membahas mengenai hubungan antara Cina dan Taliban menurut hukum internasional, kemudian soal pengakuan internasional terhadap pemerintahan Taliban di Afghanistan.              
HAK ATAS KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT ADAT DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 (The Right to Health of Indigenous People during the Covid-19 Pandemic) Andrey Sujatmoko
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 2 No. 2: November 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (375.815 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/teras-lrev.v2i2.10767

Abstract

Organisasi Kesehatan Dunia (WHO) mengumumkan keadaan darurat kesehatan pandemi Covid-19 pada Februari 2020. Menyusul sebulan kemudian Indonesia juga mengumumkan hal yang sama pasca merebaknya pandemi Covid-19 di tanah air. Seluruh kelompok masyarakat tanpa terkecuali telah terdampak pandemi itu, termasuk masyarakat adat sebagai bagian integral bangsa Indonesia. Terkait dengan hal itu, hak atas kesehatan (right to health) adalah salah satu hak asasi manusia (HAM) yang paling terdampak selama pandemi Covid-19. Terlebih lagi, masyarakat adat selama ini masih termarginalisasi dalam berbagai hal, salah satunya adalah tekait dengan kesehatan. Tulisan ini akan membahas tentang pemenuhan hak atas kesehatan masyarakat adat pada masa pandemi Covid-19 oleh pemerintah Indonesia.
TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA ATAS PELINDUNGAN OBJEK SIPIL PADA KONFLIK BERSENJATA BERDASARKAN PRINSIP PROPORSIONALITAS DALAM HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL: STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROTECTION OF CIVILIAN OBJECTS IN ARMED CONFLICT BASED ON THE PROPORTIONALITY PRINCIPLE IN INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW Fitriliani, Yulia; Sujatmoko, Andrey
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Mei 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/teraslrev.v5i1.20609

Abstract

In IHL, there is the principle of proportionality, namely in the case of carrying out an attack, both the means and the method, the damage that will be suffered by the civilian population or civilian objects must be proportional in nature and not excessive in relation to the acquisition of real and direct military benefits that can be predicted as a result of the attack on military targets. But in reality, in an armed conflict, there must be many victims, both from those who participate and those who do not participate in the war, and cause damage to civilian objects, either intentionally or unintentionally. Therefore, the research problem is how the act of attacking civilian objects in armed conflict based on the principle of proportionality; and how the state's responsibility for the protection of civilian objects in armed conflict based on the principle of proportionality. The results of the research concluded that (1) During armed conflict, it is still necessary to fulfill the principles and provisions in IHL, one of which is the principle of proportionality based on Article 57 paragraph (2) (a) (i to iii) of Additional Protocol I, 1977. The party that will carry out the attack has the obligation to gather information in advance before and at the time of the attack in order to know that the target to be attacked is a military target, not a civilian object. Then take all precautions in choosing the means and methods of attack, so that the damage to be suffered by the civilian population or civilian objects is proportionate and not excessive in relation to the acquisition of real and direct military advantage; (2) In the event of an attack on civilian objects in armed conflict, the attacking state must be responsible for all internationally wrongful acts, which result in damage and loss. This is stipulated in ARSIWA 2001, Article 2. In IAC, the 1907 Hague Convention IV, Article 3; the 1949 Geneva Conventions, namely Article 51 of Geneva Convention I, Article 52 of Geneva Convention II, Article 131 of Geneva Convention III, and Article 148 of Geneva Convention IV, 1949; Additional Protocol I, 1977, Article 91 apply. In NIAC, Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions 1949 applies.
UJI COBA NUKLIR OLEH PRANCIS DI ATMOSFER WILAYAH PASIFIK SELATAN: NUCLEAR TESTING CONDUCTED BY FRANCE OVER THE ATMOSPHERE OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC REGION Septianingsih, Alizanoor; Izni, Rifdah; Sujatmoko, Andrey
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Mei 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/m9jc2w69

Abstract

France was one of the countries that developed nuclear power as a source in 1970, and it was for this reason that France in 1973 proposed to conduct nuclear tests in the atmospheric region of the South Pacific. Later, the nuclear tests turned out to be risky, causing losses to countries in the Pacific and Oceania regions, especially Australia and New Zealand. The problems that will be researched are: what are the efforts made by Australia and New Zealand to prevent France from conducting nuclear tests in the South Pacific? The method used in this research is normative juridical, descriptive analytical, using secondary data, which includes primary and secondary legal materials obtained through literature studies, and data analysis is carried out qualitatively, and deductive conclusions are drawn. The conclusion obtained shows that the effort made by Australia, with the intervention of New Zealand, is to file a case against the French action to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to prevent France from conducting nuclear tests in the atmosphere of the South Pacific region, considering that nuclear testing is one of the things that is prohibited in offshore areas and also in the atmosphere.