Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Notaire Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Jurnal Jurisprudence
Nurwahjuni
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-BASED JOINT FUNDING SERVICES Usanti, Trisadini Prasastinah; Nurwahjuni
IUS POSITUM: Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement Vol. 2 Issue 2 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jlte.v2i1.273

Abstract

Easy requirements with a fast process and no collateral required make funding through LPBBTI highly popular among the community. In addition, these activities also provide convenience, speed, and practicality in funding. Unfortunately, there are funding risks involved, such as potential defaults by fund recipients. The funding risk will be borne by the funder and the risk will be even greater if there is no collateral in the funding because the position of the funder is only as a concurrent creditor. The objective of this research is to find out precautionary principles in information technology-based joint funding services. The method used judicial normative research was conducted to understand the legal subject and legal relationship of precautionary principles in information technology-based joint funding services. Therefore, the POJK10/POJK.05/2022 does not explicitly state the precautionary principle as the basis for LPBBTI's business activities. However, it has been realized in the norms contained in POJK10/POJK.05/2022, in the form of norms that require and norms that prohibit. One of them is the obligation to conduct funding risk analysis as a risk mitigation effort. This is intended to ensure that LPBBTI develops optimally, healthily, contributively and that users' needs for optimal protection can be accommodated.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Dalam Menerapkan Prinsip Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat Terhadap Keterangan yang Diperolehnya Dalam Pembuatan Akta Nurwahjuni; Yuniarti; Waluyo, Felia Ramadhanty
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i3.60321

Abstract

AbstractNotary as public officials have an obligation to implement the principle of recognizing beneficial owners in a corporation. A notary play an important role in disclosing beneficial ownership of a corporation, however, the transparency of beneficial ownership disclosure must be based on good faith and clear information from parties who representing the corporation. Therefore, the existence of beneficial ownership cannot fully detected by a notary, moreover, a notary has to apply the confidentiality principle. The objective of this research is to find out and examine the legal protection for Notaries regarding the provisions as reporting parties in applying the principle of recognizing the beneficial owners of corporations. The legal research is used as the research method with statute approach and conceptual approach. The results of the research explain that the provisions in Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018 must be implemented by the Notary even if this obligation is contrary to the principle of confidentiality. Matters that can be reported by a Notary are only in accordance with what is known and submitted by the parties to prevent misuse of business entities for illegal purposes such as money laundering and terrorism financing.Keywords: Confidential Principle of Deed; Notary Compliance; Beneficial Owner Transparency. AbstrakNotaris sebagai pejabat publik memiliki kewajiban untuk melaksanakan asas mengenali pemilik manfaat dalam suatu perusahaan. Notaris memegang peranan penting dalam pengungkapan kepemilikan manfaat suatu perusahaan, namun demikian, keterbukaan pengungkapan kepemilikan manfaat tersebut harus dilandasi oleh itikad baik dan keterangan yang jelas dari pihak yang mewakili perusahaan tersebut. Keberadaan kepemilikan manfaat tidak dapat sepenuhnya diketahui oleh notaris tanpa adanya itikad baik dan pemberian informasi yang benar, terlebih lagi notaris harus menerapkan asas kerahasiaan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji perlindungan hukum bagi Notaris terkait ketentuan sebagai pihak pelapor dalam penerapan asas pengakuan pemilik manfaat korporasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa ketentuan dalam Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 wajib dilaksanakan oleh Notaris meskipun kewajiban tersebut bertentangan dengan asas kerahasiaan. Hal-hal yang dapat dilaporkan oleh Notaris hanya sesuai dengan apa yang diketahui dan disampaikan oleh para pihak untuk mencegah penyalahgunaan badan usaha untuk tujuan yang melanggar hukum seperti pencucian uang dan pendanaan terorisme.Kata Kunci: Prinsip Menjaga Kerahasiaan Isi Akta Notaris; Pelaporan Notaris; Prinsip Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat dari Korporasi.
Deactivation of Health Security Participation as a Form of Unlawful Act (Legal Reasoning of the Judicial Decision in the Khalimah vs BPJS Case) Hitaningtyas, Ratih Dheviana Puru; Subhan, M. Hadi; Nurwahjuni
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6460

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study examines the legal reasoning behind the judicial decision in the case between Siti Khalimah and the Social Security Administrator of Health (Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Kesehatan/BPJS) in Papua, Indonesia. This case demonstrates the need for a constructive interpretation of the Civil Code to determine if BPJS committed a law-violating action. Methodology: As normative research, this study employed statute, case, and conceptual approaches. The statutory approach used laws and regulations as legal sources for research. The case approach was focused on the judge's ratio decidendi or the legal reasons behind their conclusion. The conceptual approach was used to refer to the fundamental principles of law. To analyze the data, the authors employed grammatical, systematic, and teleological analysis techniques. Results: Results found that that BPJS should not be declared to have violated Article 21 clause (1) of the BPJS Law as an error in fulfilling Article 1365 of the Civil Code. The judges emphasized that the aim of the norm in Article 21 clause (1) is to protect its participants against economic risks, including the loss of income. The panel of judges prioritized justice as a value in its decision. Applications of this study: This study provides a new point of view on law violating actions in the judges’ decision at court, notably in terms of social security administrators’ legal obligations, especially BPJS. Novelty/Originality of this study: Few articles have addressed the subject of legal violations committed by BPJS. Furthermore, in this article, the authors applied Dworkin's theory to the analysis of court decisions. This demonstrates the article's originality. Keywords: health insurance, worker protection, legal reasoning, legal violation, BPJS.   ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian: Penelitian ini mengkaji alasan hukum yang melatarbelakangi putusan pengadilan dalam perkara antara Siti Khalimah dan Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Kesehatan (BPJS) di Papua, Indonesia. Kasus ini menunjukkan perlunya penafsiran yang konstruktif terhadap Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata untuk menentukan apakah BPJS melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. Metodologi: Sebagai penelitian normatif, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual. Pendekatan perundang-undangan menggunakan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai sumber hukum penelitian. Pendekatan kasus difokuskan pada ratio decidendi hakim atau alasan hukum yang melatarbelakangi putusannya. Pendekatan konseptual digunakan untuk merujuk pada asas-asas hukum yang fundamental. Untuk menganalisis data, penulis menggunakan teknik analisis gramatikal, sistematis, dan teleologis. Hasil: Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa BPJS tidak dapat dinyatakan melanggar Pasal 21 ayat (1) UU BPJS karena dianggap keliru dalam memenuhi Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata. Para hakim menekankan bahwa tujuan norma dalam Pasal 21 ayat (1) adalah untuk melindungi para pesertanya dari risiko ekonomi, termasuk hilangnya pendapatan. Majelis hakim mengutamakan keadilan sebagai nilai dalam putusannya. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini memberikan sudut pandang baru terhadap tindakan pelanggaran hukum dalam putusan hakim di pengadilan, khususnya dalam hal kewajiban hukum penyelenggara jaminan sosial, khususnya BPJS. Kebaruan/Keaslian penelitian ini: Hanya sedikit artikel yang membahas tentang pelanggaran hukum yang dilakukan oleh BPJS. Lebih lanjut, dalam artikel ini, penulis menerapkan teori Dworkin untuk menganalisis putusan pengadilan. Hal ini menunjukkan keaslian artikel tersebut. Kata kunci: asuransi kesehatan, perlindungan pekerja, penalaran hukum, pelanggaran hukum, BPJS.
Broadening the Definition of 'Retirement Age' in Old Age Security Benefit Distribution Hitaningtyas, Ratih Dheviana Puru; M. Hadi Subhan; Nurwahjuni
Arena Hukum Vol. 18 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/

Abstract

The Old Age Security Program has attracted considerable attention within the broader context of social security implementation, particularly due to frequent changes in regulations governing benefit distribution. This article analyses the inclusion of criteria for workers or labourers who have ceased employment as an expansion of the definition of 'retirement age' in relation to beneficiary eligibility under Government Regulation No. 46 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of Old Age Security (Government Regulation No. 46/2015) and its amendments. Under Article 35, paragraph (2) of Law No. 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System (SJSN Law), Old Age Security benefits are provided to participants who retire, experience permanent total disability, or pass away. This analysis differs from previous studies that focused solely on changes to the waiting period for workers or labourers experiencing termination of employment. The research employs statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, and applies grammatical and systematic analysis to legal materials. The findings indicate that, although expanding the definition of 'retirement age' in the implementation regulations does not align with the original intent of the Old Age Security Program as part of the National Social Security System, the Constitutional Court has determined that such expansion is permissible under conditions of force majeure, such as termination of employment. It is recommended that future benefit distribution under the Old Age Security Program realign with the program's foundational principles.
Co-Authors Hitaningtyas, Ratih Dheviana Puru M. Hadi Subhan Subhan, M. Hadi Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti Waluyo, Felia Ramadhanty Yuniarti