Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal El Dusturie: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan Pro Justicia: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial
Nurhuda, Rohmad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Nurhuda, Rohmad
El-Dusturie Vol 1 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/eldusturie.v1i2.5098

Abstract

Noel J. Coulson identifies four distinct historical manifestations of the rise of Islamic law: first, the incorporation of the siyasa doctrine, which required the codification (grouping of similar laws into legal books) of Islamic law into state statutes. Second, Muslims are not required to follow a particular madhhab; this is what he calls the doctrine of superstition (selection), which determines which schools of thought are most widely accepted. As a third point, "tatbiq doctrine" (law application to new events) alludes to the creation of law before the emergence of new legal events. Fourth, he defines the process of transforming law from traditional to modern forms as "Tajdid doctrine" (reinterpretation).Noel J. Coulson mengidentifikasi empat manifestasi historis yang berbeda dari kebangkitan hukum Islam: pertama, penggabungan doktrin siyasah, yang memerlukan kodifikasi (pengelompokan hukum serupa ke dalam buku hukum) hukum Islam ke dalam undang-undang negara. Kedua, Muslim tidak diharuskan mengikuti mazhab tertentu; inilah yang dia sebut sebagai doktrin takhayyur (seleksi), yang menentukan aliran pemikiran mana yang paling banyak diterima. Sebagai poin ketiga, "doktrin tathbiq" (penerapan hukum pada peristiwa baru) menyinggung penciptaan hukum sebelum munculnya peristiwa hukum baru. Keempat, ia mendefinisikan proses transformasi hukum dari bentuk tradisional ke bentuk modern sebagai "doktrin Tajdid" (reinterpretasi). 
Melampaui Tradisi: Evaluasi Dampak Kebijakan Politik Terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Keluarga Nurhuda, Rohmad
El-Dusturie Vol 3 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/eldusturie.v3i1.8639

Abstract

Rapid changes in social and political dynamics have triggered a response from the government in the form of political policies aimed at creating family law that is more inclusive, fair and in line with the demands of the times. In line with the evolution of political policies affecting family law, there are essential questions that guide this research. First, how have political policies influenced reforms in family law? Second, to what extent have these changes been effective in achieving the goals of equality, justice and family welfare? Third, what are the challenges and obstacles that arise in the implementation of political policies related to family law reform? The policy analysis method, case study, and qualitative approach in this research are expected to provide a comprehensive picture of the complexity of the interaction between political policy and family law reform, as well as its impact on society. The development of family law in Indonesia reflects a journey from conservative norms towards increased individual rights, gender equality and family diversity. The results of this study show that the implementation of political policies related to family law reform faces a number of challenges, including resistance from conservative groups and skepticism among the Muslim community. Ambiguity in the criteria for change, changing political dynamics, and controversy surrounding the practice of underage marriage are obstacles to achieving consistency and clarity in implementation. In addition, the need for balance between positive and Islamic law emphasizes the importance of dialogue and cooperation across sectors to achieve an effective and sustainable vision of family law reform. With this balance in mind, this study emphasizes that constructive and inclusive dialogue between the government, the Muslim community, and other stakeholders is key to ensuring that changes to family law are acceptable to all parties and remain consistent with constitutional values and respected sharia principles.
Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Nurhuda, Rohmad
El-Dusturie Vol 1 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/eldusturie.v1i2.5098

Abstract

Noel J. Coulson identifies four distinct historical manifestations of the rise of Islamic law: first, the incorporation of the siyasa doctrine, which required the codification (grouping of similar laws into legal books) of Islamic law into state statutes. Second, Muslims are not required to follow a particular madhhab; this is what he calls the doctrine of superstition (selection), which determines which schools of thought are most widely accepted. As a third point, "tatbiq doctrine" (law application to new events) alludes to the creation of law before the emergence of new legal events. Fourth, he defines the process of transforming law from traditional to modern forms as "Tajdid doctrine" (reinterpretation).Noel J. Coulson mengidentifikasi empat manifestasi historis yang berbeda dari kebangkitan hukum Islam: pertama, penggabungan doktrin siyasah, yang memerlukan kodifikasi (pengelompokan hukum serupa ke dalam buku hukum) hukum Islam ke dalam undang-undang negara. Kedua, Muslim tidak diharuskan mengikuti mazhab tertentu; inilah yang dia sebut sebagai doktrin takhayyur (seleksi), yang menentukan aliran pemikiran mana yang paling banyak diterima. Sebagai poin ketiga, "doktrin tathbiq" (penerapan hukum pada peristiwa baru) menyinggung penciptaan hukum sebelum munculnya peristiwa hukum baru. Keempat, ia mendefinisikan proses transformasi hukum dari bentuk tradisional ke bentuk modern sebagai "doktrin Tajdid" (reinterpretasi). 
Melampaui Tradisi: Evaluasi Dampak Kebijakan Politik Terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Keluarga Nurhuda, Rohmad
El-Dusturie Vol 3 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/eldusturie.v3i1.8639

Abstract

Rapid changes in social and political dynamics have triggered a response from the government in the form of political policies aimed at creating family law that is more inclusive, fair and in line with the demands of the times. In line with the evolution of political policies affecting family law, there are essential questions that guide this research. First, how have political policies influenced reforms in family law? Second, to what extent have these changes been effective in achieving the goals of equality, justice and family welfare? Third, what are the challenges and obstacles that arise in the implementation of political policies related to family law reform? The policy analysis method, case study, and qualitative approach in this research are expected to provide a comprehensive picture of the complexity of the interaction between political policy and family law reform, as well as its impact on society. The development of family law in Indonesia reflects a journey from conservative norms towards increased individual rights, gender equality and family diversity. The results of this study show that the implementation of political policies related to family law reform faces a number of challenges, including resistance from conservative groups and skepticism among the Muslim community. Ambiguity in the criteria for change, changing political dynamics, and controversy surrounding the practice of underage marriage are obstacles to achieving consistency and clarity in implementation. In addition, the need for balance between positive and Islamic law emphasizes the importance of dialogue and cooperation across sectors to achieve an effective and sustainable vision of family law reform. With this balance in mind, this study emphasizes that constructive and inclusive dialogue between the government, the Muslim community, and other stakeholders is key to ensuring that changes to family law are acceptable to all parties and remain consistent with constitutional values and respected sharia principles.
Tinjauan Maqhasid Syariah Terhadap Perkawinan Beda Agama (Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No. 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby) Nurhuda, Rohmad
Pro Justicia: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Riyadlotul Mujahidin Ngabar (IAIRM) Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55380/projus.v2i2.363

Abstract

Permohonan pencatatan nikah beda agama di Kantor Pencatatan Sipil Kota Surabaya yang ditolak kemudian mengajukan permohonan sidang ke Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya untuk memperoleh legalitas perkawinannya. Perkara tersebut baru saja ditetapkan dengan nomor 916/Pdt.p/2022/PN.Sby pada tanggal 26 April 2022 lalu dengan penetapan tersebut secara umum memberikan pelegalalan pasangan beda agama tersebut dan memerintahkan Kantor Pencatatan Sipil mencatat perkawinannya. Menilik permasalahan tersebut penulis berusaha untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis lebih dalam tentang tinjauan maqhasid Syariah terhadap perkawinan beda agama dengan menganalisis Pertimbangan Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No. 916/Pdt.p/2022/PN.Sby dalam Artikel ini. Pembahasan dan analisis pada artikel ini nantinya menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yuridis normatif adalah penelitian hukum kepustakaan yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan-bahan pustaka atau data sekunder. Berdasarkan analisis Penulis didapatkan hasil bahwa pertimbangan-pertimbangan hakim dan juga penetapan hakim terkait perkawinan beda Agama menurut maqhasid Syariah memiliki banyak sekali mudarat daripada manfaatnya. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari dari konsep pemiliharan agama hingga konsep pemiliharaan harta pada analisis penulis yang menyatakan bahwa mudarat lebih besar daripada manfaat yang akan diperoleh dengan adanya perkawinan beda agama tersebut.
Regulasi Aborsi Korban Pemerkosaan dalam Perspektif Ham dan Gender Nurhuda, Rohmad
Pro Justicia: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Riyadlotul Mujahidin Ngabar (IAIRM) Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55380/projus.v3i2.654

Abstract

Kasus aborsi korban pemerkosaan di Indonesia memunculkan perdebatan dan tantangan kompleks, terutama terkait hak asasi manusia (HAM) dan dinamika gender. Meskipun undang-undang kesehatan memberikan pengecualian bagi korban perkosaan, implementasinya masih menuai kontroversi. Artikel ini mengadopsi metode analisis literatur dan kebijakan untuk menyelidiki perspektif HAM dan gender dalam konteks aborsi korban pemerkosaan. Pemahaman mendalam tentang implikasi HAM dan gender diungkap melalui evaluasi regulasi, termasuk dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana yang terbaru. Kompleksitas faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kejadian aborsi, seperti karakteristik perempuan, status kesehatan, pelayanan kesehatan, dan aspek budaya-agama, juga dianalisis. Hasilnya menyoroti upaya pembaruan dalam regulasi, namun menekankan perlunya pendekatan holistik. Artikel ini menekankan perlunya integrasi aspek kesehatan, hukum, dan sosial guna memastikan perlindungan hak dan kesejahteraan korban pemerkosaan. Dalam rangka penanganan aborsi korban pemerkosaan, artikel ini memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman mendalam terhadap kompleksitas isu ini dan menekankan perlunya pendekatan yang komprehensif dan berbasis hak asasi manusia dan gender.
Co-Authors