Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Persepsi Publik Terhadap Keakuratan Quick Count dan Dampaknya Terhadap Stabilitas Publik Thoriq, Ahmad Reihan; Sihotang, Josua Ferdinand; Bauw, Elirica Aliyah Irwan; Safira, Dewi; Putri, Veronica Cynthia; Yuli, Yuliana
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 1, No 11 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11408498

Abstract

This research aims to understand how public perception of quick count results influences the overall election process and political stability in Indonesia. The study also examines the relationship between the public's level of trust in quick count institutions and SDG 16 as an accountable and transparent institution. This research employs a normative legal study, focusing on a literature review. Based on the conducted research, it was found that Quick Count affects public trust by monitoring and predicting fast and accurate results. This allows the public to have an initial understanding of the outcome before it is published by the KPU. Quick Count is used as a means to assess the transparency of the election vote counting process.
The Dilemma of Restorative Justice as Impunity for Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Against Children Safira, Dewi; Kholiq, Abdul
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.49044

Abstract

The increasing application of restorative justice in handling cases of child sexual violence in Indonesia has sparked controversy due to its potential to create impunity for perpetrators and neglect victims’ rights. This study aims to analyze the dilemma of restorative justice as a form of impunity in child sexual violence cases and to propose an ideal model that ensures the fulfillment of victims’ rights and the realization of substantive justice. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials are examined through qualitative analysis to identify inconsistencies between regulatory norms and practical implementation. The findings reveal that although restorative justice aims to restore victims and rehabilitate offenders, its misapplication especially when diversion is carried out without sufficient attention to the victim’s recovery may result in impunity and re-victimization. Furthermore, the lack of understanding among law enforcement officials, inadequate monitoring mechanisms, and social pressure contribute to ineffective victim protection. The study proposes a victim-centered restorative justice model that emphasizes comprehensive victim recovery, offender accountability, and active community participation supported by trained facilitators and strict supervision. The novelty of this research lies in offering a structured model for implementing restorative justice that balances victims’ and offenders’ rights, thereby ensuring substantive justice and preventing impunity in cases of child sexual violence.