Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Sihotang, Josua Ferdinand
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Persepsi Publik Terhadap Keakuratan Quick Count dan Dampaknya Terhadap Stabilitas Publik Thoriq, Ahmad Reihan; Sihotang, Josua Ferdinand; Bauw, Elirica Aliyah Irwan; Safira, Dewi; Putri, Veronica Cynthia; Yuli, Yuliana
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 1, No 11 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11408498

Abstract

This research aims to understand how public perception of quick count results influences the overall election process and political stability in Indonesia. The study also examines the relationship between the public's level of trust in quick count institutions and SDG 16 as an accountable and transparent institution. This research employs a normative legal study, focusing on a literature review. Based on the conducted research, it was found that Quick Count affects public trust by monitoring and predicting fast and accurate results. This allows the public to have an initial understanding of the outcome before it is published by the KPU. Quick Count is used as a means to assess the transparency of the election vote counting process.
Pemanfaatan dan Permasalahan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Kehidupan Manusia Serta Pengaturannya Secara Hukum Akbar, Muhammad Dafi; Sihotang, Josua Ferdinand; Purnama, Rendika; Hasna, Taria
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12169651

Abstract

This research was conducted to obtain information, including theories, concepts, legal principles and legal regulations. In using primary legal materials, this article uses materials, namely the ITE Law of 2008 Jo. 2023 as well as secondary legal materials, namely books, articles and legal journals providing further explanation of primary legal materials. This includes draft laws, research results, and opinions of legal experts. This research was conducted using normative juridical research (normative legal research method). The normative juridical research method is library legal research which is carried out by examining library materials or mere secondary data. The era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution has entered the digital era where Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays an important role in transforming various aspects of human life, including the legal realm. While AI offers many benefits, its utilization also raises significant concerns and challenges, particularly in the context of legal regulations and ethical considerations. In Indonesia, even though AI technology is experiencing rapid progress, there is still no specific legal framework that addresses its existence and implications. The Information and Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE) provides the basis for regulating electronic systems, including AI, although indirectly. AI is categorized under electronic systems and electronic agents according to Indonesian law. This classification implies that AI operates under the control and responsibility of a human operator or system provider.
Pelanggaran Etika Terkait Pemalsuan Dokumen oleh Advokat Sihotang, Josua Ferdinand; Sihombing, Albert Hasea Samuel; Simamora, Tesalonika Amazia; Az-Zahra, Fatimah; Wulandari, Hania; Yesica, Shely; Steffanie, Josephine; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The legal profession of advocacy plays a crucial role within Indonesia’s legal system as a guardian of justice and protector of human rights. However, ethical violations, particularly document forgery, pose significant challenges that threaten the integrity of the profession. This study aims to analyze the regulation of the Advocate’s code of ethics concerning document forgery, the applicable sanctions, and the impact on the judicial system and public trust. Using a normative juridical approach, this research examines provisions from the Advocate Law, the Indonesian Advocate Code of Ethics (KEAI), and the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP). The findings reveal that advocates involved in document forgery may face criminal, ethical, and administrative sanctions. Such violations not only harm clients but also establish a negative precedent for the rule of law. Therefore, stricter oversight, consistent enforcement of sanctions, and the enhancement of ethical awareness among advocates are essential to maintain the profession’s integrity. Preventing and addressing ethical violations are critical steps in preserving public confidence in Indonesia’s legal system.
Analisis Hukum Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Terhadap Kasus Korupsi Proyek Tol Mbz: Pelanggaran Tender dan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Setiawan, Antonius Ryan Dandy; Syah, Aurellia Zerikha; Sihotang, Josua Ferdinand; Narindra, Rochella Amalia
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17698517

Abstract

This study analyzes legal violations in the procurement of goods/services in the corruption case of the Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed (MBZ) Toll Road project, focusing on deviations from the principles of Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 and the application of corporate criminal liability under Article 20 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (UU Tipikor). The case reveals patterns of tender collusion, technical specification manipulation, budget mark-ups, and collusion causing state losses up to IDR 510 billion, violating principles of efficiency, transparency, accountability, competitiveness, and value for money. Using a normative juridical approach with secondary data from regulations, court decisions, and scholarly literature, the analysis concludes that corporations like KSO Waskita-Acset meet the corporate fault criteria under Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016, warranting fines, additional sanctions such as blacklisting, and asset recovery. The study emphasizes the need for procurement system reforms to prevent systemic corruption.
Co-Authors Akbar, Muhammad Dafi Az-Zahra, Fatimah Bauw, Elirica Aliyah Irwan Hasna, Taria Mulyadi M, Mulyadi Narindra, Rochella Amalia Purnama, Rendika Putri, Veronica Cynthia Safira, Dewi Setiawan, Antonius Ryan Dandy Sihombing, Albert Hasea Samuel Simamora, Tesalonika Amazia Steffanie, Josephine Syah, Aurellia Zerikha Thoriq, Ahmad Reihan Wulandari, Hania Yesica, Shely Yuli, Yuliana