Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Honeste Vivere

KEWENANGAN MPR SEBAGAI LEMBAGA TINGGI NEGARA Silitonga, Marudut Parulian; Wijayati, Ani; H, Andree Washington
Honeste Vivere Vol 34 No 1 (2024): January
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Every high state institution in the Republic of Indonesia has the authority contained in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The authority granted by the constitution is a binding authority for high state institutions. The strengths and weaknesses of the authority of high state institutions influence the constitutional law system in Indonesia. Authority between high state institutions is a reflection of the checks and balances in the democratic system in Indonesia. The People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) of the Republic of Indonesia has become the highest state institution after the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, where this institution is called the highest state institution. As a high state institution, the MPR has the authority to amend and enact the constitution. The MPR's authority is also stated in Law No. 17 of 2014 concerning MD3 in article 4, which is more ceremonial in nature. Strengthening the authority of the MPR is very necessary as a high state institution to create balance and corrections between state institutions. It is hoped that the MPR institution will not be a complementary high institution in the Indonesian constitutional system.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA AKIBAT COVID-19 SEBAGAI ALASAN MEMAKSA FORCE MAJEURE (STUDI PUTUSAN NO 134/PDT.SUS-PHI/2021/PN JKT.PST) Anjelina, Paramita; Wijayati, Ani; A.M. Pandiangan, L. Elly
Honeste Vivere Vol 34 No 2 (2024): July
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v34i2.340

Abstract

The global impact of the Covid-19 pandemic has been substantial, particularly affecting the health and economic sectors across all countries. The virus's swift spread has resulted in heightened domestic activities, influencing the economy and disrupting businesses, employment, and overall social life. The Indonesian government has officially acknowledged the pandemic as a national crisis and emergency. In summary, the Covid-19 pandemic has deeply affected various facets, encompassing health, the economy, social interactions, and employment. To address this crisis, the government has implemented measures to mitigate its effects and safeguard the safety and welfare of the workforce. This study uses a method of normative jurisprudence with a legal approach (Statute Approach) and a case approach. (Case Approach). The library materials used in this writing are laws, court rulings, books, journals, websites and so on related to Covid-19, termination of employment, and force majeure. The findings of this research indicate that a company undergoing the challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic doesn't automatically qualify for force majeure; the company is required to demonstrate that the pandemic significantly impacts the viability of its operations, necessitating certain actions. Additionally, the rights of the workers must be upheld in such cases, ensuring their well-being and satisfaction. In legal proceedings, judges are tasked with enforcing the law in accordance with the principles of justice and the rule of law.